Page 2335
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Effective Communication and Startup Performance among Young
Entrepreneurs
Augusta Bosede Amaihian
1
, Harry Lydia Ineba Decster
2
, Oluwaseun Oluwadamilare Oluwasanmi
3
,
Ilevbaoje Olohije Ruth
4
, Fred Ojochide Peter
5
1
Department of Business Management, School of Management and Social Sciences, Miva Open
University, Abuja, Nigeria.
2
Department of Business Administration, School of Business and Social Sciences, Landmark University,
Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria.
3
Department of Business Management, School of Management and Social Sciences, Miva Open
University, Abuja, Nigeria.
4
Department of Management, University of Nigeria, Nsukka (Enugu Campus), Nigeria
5
Department of Business Management, School of Management and Social Sciences, Miva Open
University, Abuja, Nigeria.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600170
Received: 29 June 2026; Accepted: 04 July 2026; Published: 18 July 2026
ABSTRACT
Effective communication is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in the success and performance of startup
ventures. However, many young entrepreneurs encounter communication-related challenges, including unclear
information, weak feedback systems, and delays in communication, which can adversely affect employee
coordination, decision-making, customer relations, and overall business performance. This study examined the
influence of communication clarity, feedback mechanisms, and communication timeliness on startup performance
among young entrepreneurs. A quantitative research approach was adopted, and data were analyzed using
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess the relationships among the study variables. Model fitness was
evaluated using multiple goodness-of-fit indices, including Chi-square statistics, Root Mean Square Error of
Approximation (RMSEA), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), Comparative Fit Index (CFI),
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and the Coefficient of Determination (CD). Three hypotheses were tested to determine
the effects of clarity of information, feedback mechanisms, and communication timeliness on startup performance
using path coefficients, standard errors, z-values, and p-values. The findings revealed that clarity of information
(β = 0.2373, p < 0.05), feedback mechanisms (β = 0.3395, p < 0.01), and communication timeliness (β = 0.2808,
p < 0.01) exert positive and statistically significant effects on startup performance. The results suggest that clear
communication enhances employee understanding and operational effectiveness, effective feedback mechanisms
support continuous improvement and goal alignment, while timely communication facilitates responsiveness and
efficient decision-making. The study concludes that effective communication strategies are essential for
improving startup performance among young entrepreneurs. It recommends that startup founders prioritize clear
information sharing, establish structured feedback systems, and ensure timely communication to enhance
business growth, operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability.
Keywords: Effective Communication, Communication Clarity, Feedback Mechanisms, Communication
Timeliness, Startup Performance, Young Entrepreneurs.
INTRODUCTION
Startups have become important drivers of innovation, job creation, and economic growth in many countries.
Young entrepreneurs are increasingly establishing startup ventures across various sectors, contributing
Page 2336
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
significantly to economic development. However, the survival and growth of startups often depend on the ability
of entrepreneurs to effectively manage resources, coordinate activities, and maintain strong relationships with
employees, customers, investors, and other stakeholders. Among the factors that influence startup success,
effective communication has emerged as a critical strategic tool for enhancing organizational performance.
Communication refers to the process through which information, ideas, and meaning are exchanged among
individuals to achieve mutual understanding. In entrepreneurial settings, communication goes beyond the simple
transfer of information; it facilitates coordination, promotes collaboration, and aligns individual efforts with
organizational goals. According to Verčič (2021), communication serves as a fundamental mechanism through
which organizational activities and relationships are established and maintained. Similarly, Men (2020) argues
that effective communication reduces uncertainty, enhances trust, and improves employee commitment, thereby
contributing to improved organizational outcomes.
For young entrepreneurs, effective communication is particularly important because startups often operate in
dynamic and highly competitive environments. Entrepreneurs must communicate their vision clearly to
employees, customers, investors, and business partners to gain support and achieve business objectives. Clear
communication helps employees understand organizational expectations and responsibilities, leading to higher
productivity and improved performance. Furthermore, communication encourages teamwork, knowledge
sharing, and innovation, all of which are essential for startup growth and sustainability. Effective communication
also depends on the existence of strong feedback mechanisms. Feedback enables entrepreneurs to evaluate
performance, identify challenges, and make informed decisions. Through continuous interaction with employees
and customers, startups can adapt to changing market conditions and improve service delivery. Ruck (2021) notes
that effective feedback promotes collaboration and strengthens organizational relationships, which are essential
for achieving business goals.
Another important aspect of communication is timeliness. In startup environments where decisions often need to
be made quickly, delayed communication can result in missed opportunities and operational inefficiencies. Timely
communication ensures that relevant information reaches stakeholders when needed, enabling effective
coordination and prompt decision-making. Kim (2022) emphasizes that organizations that communicate
information promptly are better positioned to respond to environmental changes and maintain competitive
advantage. The growing importance of communication became more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic,
when many businesses relied heavily on digital communication channels to maintain operations. Organizations
that adopted transparent, timely, and empathetic communication practices were better able to sustain employee
engagement and organizational performance during periods of uncertainty (Ruck & Men, 2021). These
experiences reinforced the strategic value of communication in achieving organizational resilience and long-term
success. Despite the recognized importance of communication, many startups continue to experience challenges
related to unclear information, inadequate feedback systems, and communication delays. Such challenges often
result in misunderstandings, reduced employee commitment, poor customer relations, and lower organizational
performance. Although previous studies have highlighted the importance of communication in organizations,
limited empirical evidence exists on how specific communication strategies influence startup performance among
young entrepreneurs.
Therefore, this study examines the influence of effective communication strategies on startup performance among
young entrepreneurs. Specifically, the study focuses on clarity of information, feedback mechanisms, and
communication timeliness as key dimensions of effective communication. By investigating their effects on startup
performance, the study seeks to provide insights that can help young entrepreneurs develop communication
practices that enhance business growth, competitiveness, and sustainability.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Effective Communication Strategies
Effective communication strategies refer to the planned approaches used by entrepreneurs and organizations to
ensure that information is communicated clearly, accurately, and timely to relevant stakeholders. Communication
serves as a critical mechanism through which ideas, goals, and expectations are shared and understood within an
Page 2337
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
organization (Men, 2020). In startup environments, effective communication is particularly important because
young entrepreneurs often operate with limited resources and rely heavily on teamwork, innovation, and
collaboration to achieve business objectives. Effective communication strategies help reduce misunderstandings,
improve coordination, and facilitate decision-making processes.
Communication effectiveness is influenced by several factors, including message clarity, feedback mechanisms,
communication channels, and timeliness of information dissemination. According to Verčič (2021),
communication is not merely the transmission of information but a strategic process that shapes organizational
culture, employee behavior, and business outcomes. Startups that adopt effective communication strategies are
better positioned to build strong relationships with employees, customers, investors, and business partners.
Furthermore, clear and consistent communication enhances trust and commitment among stakeholders,
contributing to improved organizational performance. Understanding how communication strategies influence
startup performance is therefore essential for young entrepreneurs seeking sustainable business growth.
Effective Communication Strategies and Entrepreneurial Behaviour
Effective communication strategies significantly influence entrepreneurial behavior by shaping decision-making,
leadership effectiveness, innovation, and stakeholder engagement. Entrepreneurs who communicate clearly are
more capable of articulating their vision, motivating employees, and building productive relationships with
customers and investors (Kim & Rhee, 2020). Communication also facilitates knowledge sharing and
collaboration, enabling startups to respond effectively to changing market conditions.
Positive communication practices encourage employee participation, creativity, and commitment, which are
essential for startup success. Conversely, poor communication may lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and
reduced productivity. In many developing economies, startups struggle due to inadequate communication
structures that hinder coordination and organizational learning. Research suggests that entrepreneurs who
prioritize communication are more likely to achieve business growth, customer satisfaction, and competitive
advantage (Ruck & Men, 2021). Therefore, effective communication serves as a behavioral driver that supports
entrepreneurial success and organizational sustainability.
Clarity of Information
Clarity of information refers to the extent to which messages are understandable, accurate, and free from
ambiguity. Clear communication enables employees and stakeholders to comprehend organizational goals,
expectations, and responsibilities effectively (Men & Yue, 2021). In startup ventures, where employees often
perform multiple roles, clarity of information is essential for ensuring coordinated efforts and minimizing
operational errors.
Young entrepreneurs who communicate information clearly enhance employee confidence and improve task
execution. Clear information reduces uncertainty and facilitates better decision-making, leading to higher
productivity and organizational effectiveness. Studies indicate that organizations characterized by transparent
communication experience greater employee engagement and improved performance outcomes (Kim, 2022).
Consequently, clarity of information is considered a critical dimension of effective communication strategy.
Feedback Mechanisms
Feedback mechanisms refer to the structured processes through which information is exchanged between
entrepreneurs, employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Effective feedback allows organizations to evaluate
performance, identify challenges, and implement necessary improvements (Ruck & Men, 2021). In startup
settings, feedback promotes learning and innovation by enabling entrepreneurs to adapt quickly to environmental
changes.
Regular feedback enhances employee motivation, strengthens relationships, and improves organizational
responsiveness. It also supports customer satisfaction by providing insights into customer needs and expectations.
Verčič (2021) notes that organizations that encourage two-way communication are more likely to achieve higher
Page 2338
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
levels of collaboration and operational efficiency. Therefore, effective feedback mechanisms contribute
significantly to startup performance and growth.
Communication Timeliness
Communication timeliness refers to the prompt delivery of relevant information to stakeholders when it is needed.
Timely communication is particularly important in startup environments where rapid decision-making and
adaptability are necessary for survival and growth. Delays in communication can result in missed opportunities,
operational inefficiencies, and reduced stakeholder confidence (Kim, 2022).
Young entrepreneurs who provide timely information improve coordination among team members and enhance
organizational responsiveness. Timely communication also helps employees remain informed about
organizational changes, performance expectations, and strategic priorities. Research has shown that organizations
that communicate promptly are better able to manage uncertainty and maintain stakeholder trust (Men, 2020).
Consequently, communication timeliness is an important determinant of startup performance.
Startup Performance
Startup performance refers to the extent to which a startup achieves its operational and strategic objectives.
Performance is commonly measured through indicators such as sales growth, customer satisfaction, profitability,
innovation, market expansion, and business sustainability (Verčič & Špoljarić, 2020). For young entrepreneurs,
startup performance reflects the ability to effectively utilize resources and respond to market opportunities.
Recent studies suggest that communication quality significantly influences both financial and non-financial
performance outcomes. Effective communication improves employee productivity, customer relationships,
innovation capability, and organizational adaptability (Men & Yue, 2021). As startups operate in highly
competitive and uncertain environments, communication strategies become essential tools for enhancing business
performance and ensuring long-term sustainability.
Theoretical Review
Social Exchange Theory (SET)
Social Exchange Theory (SET) was developed by George Homans (1958) and later expanded by Peter Blau
(1964). The theory posits that relationships are built on reciprocal exchanges in which individuals respond
positively to perceived benefits received from others. In entrepreneurial settings, communication serves as a
valuable resource that facilitates trust, cooperation, and commitment among startup founders, employees,
customers, investors, and other stakeholders. Effective communication creates an environment where
stakeholders feel valued and informed, encouraging them to reciprocate through loyalty, collaboration, and
support (Kim & Rhee, 2020).
Despite its relevance, the theory has several limitations. Critics argue that SET assumes individuals behave
rationally and calculate costs and benefits before responding, whereas entrepreneurial relationships are often
influenced by emotions, values, and social factors. Furthermore, not all stakeholder actions are based on
reciprocity, as some may be motivated by intrinsic commitment or shared entrepreneurial vision.
In the context of this study, Social Exchange Theory explains how communication clarity, feedback mechanisms,
and communication timeliness influence startup performance. When young entrepreneurs communicate clearly,
encourage feedback, and provide timely information, employees and stakeholders are more likely to respond
positively through increased engagement, commitment, innovation, and support. Consequently, effective
communication strengthens relationships that contribute to improved startup performance.
Page 2339
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Resource-Based View (RBV)
The Resource-Based View (RBV) was propounded by Birger Wernerfelt (1984) and further developed by Jay
Barney (1991). The theory argues that organizations achieve sustained competitive advantage through resources
and capabilities that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable (VRIN). Beyond physical and financial
resources, RBV recognizes intangible assets such as knowledge, managerial competence, and communication
capability as critical determinants of organizational success.
For startups, effective communication represents a strategic capability that enables entrepreneurs to coordinate
activities, share knowledge, build stakeholder relationships, and make informed decisions. Verčič and Špoljarić
(2020) note that organizations with well-developed communication systems are better able to adapt to
environmental changes, improve operational efficiency, and achieve superior performance outcomes.
Although RBV has been widely adopted, it has been criticized for paying insufficient attention to external
environmental factors such as competition, technological change, and market conditions. Additionally, measuring
intangible resources such as communication capability can be challenging due to their abstract nature.
Within the context of this study, the Resource-Based View provides a useful framework for understanding
communication as a strategic resource that enhances startup performance. Specifically, communication clarity,
feedback mechanisms, and communication timeliness are viewed as valuable communication capabilities that
enable young entrepreneurs to improve coordination, strengthen stakeholder relationships, and respond
effectively to business challenges. As these capabilities become embedded within startup operations, they
contribute to sustainable growth and competitive advantage.
METHODOLOGY
This study adopted a descriptive quantitative research design to investigate the influence of effective
communication strategies on startup performance among young entrepreneurs. The descriptive approach was
considered appropriate because it enabled the collection and analysis of data relating to communication practices
and business performance within startup organizations in a real-world setting. The quantitative nature of the study
facilitated the measurement of relationships among communication clarity, feedback mechanisms,
communication timeliness, and startup performance. This approach provided an objective basis for identifying
patterns and determining how communication strategies contribute to business growth, operational efficiency,
and sustainability among startup ventures.
The study population comprised young entrepreneurs, startup founders, managers, and employees of startup
businesses operating in Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria. Ikeja is one of the major commercial and technological hubs
in Lagos State, hosting a growing number of startups across sectors such as technology, digital services, e-
commerce, consulting, and creative industries. Recent startup directories indicate that over 70 active startup firms
operate within the area. These individuals were considered appropriate respondents because they are directly
involved in organizational communication and business operations, thereby providing valuable insights into
communication practices and startup performance.
The sample size for the study consisted of 140 respondents drawn from the identified startup firms in Ikeja. Two
respondents, comprising founders, managers, or key employees, were selected from each startup to ensure
adequate representation. Given the specialized nature of the study and the need to obtain information from
respondents with relevant knowledge of communication processes, purposive sampling was employed to select
startup firms and key respondents. This approach enabled the researcher to obtain reliable information from
participants directly involved in entrepreneurial and managerial activities.
Data were collected using a structured questionnaire containing closed-ended questions measured on a five-point
Likert scale ranging from Strongly Agree (5) to Strongly Disagree (1). The questionnaire was designed to measure
communication clarity, feedback mechanisms, communication timeliness, and startup performance. To ensure
validity, the instrument was reviewed by experts in entrepreneurship, management, and communication studies
Page 2340
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
for clarity, relevance, and content adequacy. Reliability was established through a pilot study and Cronbach's
Alpha reliability test, with all constructs meeting the acceptable reliability threshold of 0.70, indicating
satisfactory internal consistency.
The data obtained were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) and Structural Equation
Modeling (SEM). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations, were
used to summarize respondents' characteristics and response patterns.
Inferential analysis was conducted using SEM to examine the relationships among communication clarity,
feedback mechanisms, communication timeliness, and startup performance. Model fitness was assessed using
established goodness-of-fit indices, while hypothesis testing was conducted using path coefficients, standard
errors, z-values, and p-values.
Ethical considerations were strictly observed throughout the study. Respondents were informed of the purpose of
the research and their participation was entirely voluntary. Informed consent was obtained before questionnaire
administration, while confidentiality and anonymity were guaranteed. Participants were assured that information
provided would be used solely for academic purposes.
These procedures ensured that the study generated reliable, valid, and ethical findings capable of explaining the
influence of effective communication strategies on startup performance among young entrepreneurs.
RESULTS
Goodness of Fit Tests
Table 1 Equation-level goodness of fit
Table 4.3.1 Goodness of Fit tests
Fit Statistic
Value
Description
Likelihood Ratio
chi²_ms(0)
0
Model vs. saturated
p > chi²
.
chi²_bs(7)
402.18
Baseline vs. saturated
p > chi²
0
Population Error
RMSEA
0.078
Root mean squared error of approximation
90% CI (Lower Bound)
0
90% CI (Upper Bound)
0.19
p-close
0.93
Probability RMSEA ≤ 0.05
Information Criteria
AIC
1171.34
Akaike’s Information Criterion
BIC
12127.76
Bayesian Information Criterion
Baseline Comparison
CFI
0.916
Comparative Fit Index
TLI
0.942
Tucker-Lewis Index
Page 2341
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Size of Residuals
SRMR
0.097
Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual
CD
0.902
Coefficient of Determination
Source: Field Survey, 2026
The study used equation level, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Wald and Likelihood ratio tests to test for
goodness of fit. Because there are various goodness-of-fit indices, it is not easy to determine which index to use
for an evaluation since each evaluates different aspects of the model fit. The literature recommends the chi-square
statistic and degrees of freedom (χ
2
/df), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI), root
mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) as absolute
fit indices; comparative normed fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewisindex (TLI) as incremental fit indices;
The results of the goodness of fit statistics indicate that the computed value of the Chi-square statistic for the
model versus saturated is zero. This means that the model is the same as the saturated model and thus, a good fit.
The calculated Chi-square for baseline versus saturated and its associated p-value are 402.18 (p < 0.01), which
indicates a significant difference between the baseline and the saturated. The implication is that the model is a
good fit to the data. The results of the root mean square error (RMSE) are within the benchmark range, thus
indicating a good fit The same argument applies to the standardised mean square residual (SRMSR). The
computed values of the comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis’s index, and the coefficient of determination (CFI,
TLI, and CD) are reasonably high, thus indicating a good fit. All the goodness-of-fit statistics indicate that the
structural equation model is a good fit to the data (See Table 1).
Structural Equation Model Results
Table 2 presents the results of the structural equation model examining the effects of effective communication
dimensions on organizational performance.
Structural Equation Model Results
Path
Coefficient
(β)
Std.
Error
p-
value
95% Confidence
Interval
Clarity of Information → Organizational
Performance
0.2373
0.0965
0.024
0.1442 0.3303
Feedback Mechanisms → Organizational
Performance
0.3395
0.065
0
0.2121 0.4668
Communication Timeliness →
Organizational Performance
0.2808
0.0515
0
0.1797 0.3818
Source: Field Survey, 2026
The results indicate that all three dimensions of effective communication exert positive and statistically significant
effects on organizational performance. Specifically, clarity of information positively influences organizational
performance = 0.2373, p < 0.05), suggesting that employees perform more effectively when organizational
messages are clear, understandable, and free from ambiguity. Feedback mechanisms demonstrate the strongest
effect on organizational performance = 0.3395, p < 0.01), highlighting the importance of two-way
communication in enhancing employee alignment, learning, and task execution. Similarly, communication
timeliness significantly improves organizational performance = 0.2808, p < 0.01), indicating that the prompt
dissemination of information facilitates effective decision-making and operational efficiency. Hence, the findings
support the proposition that effective communication constitutes a critical organizational capability that enhances
performance outcomes through improved understanding, coordination, and employee engagement.
Page 2342
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
The findings reveal that effective communication significantly contributes to organizational performance through
its dimensions of information clarity, feedback mechanisms, and communication timeliness. The positive effect
of clarity of information corroborates prior studies that identify transparent and unambiguous communication as
a prerequisite for employee understanding, coordination, and productivity (Men et al., 2020; Jiang & Men, 2023).
Clear communication reduces uncertainty and enables employees to align their actions with organizational
objectives, thereby improving performance outcomes.
The study further found that feedback mechanisms exert the strongest influence on organizational performance.
This finding is consistent with contemporary literature emphasizing feedback as a key driver of employee
learning, engagement, and continuous improvement (Anseel et al., 2021; Boudrias et al., 2022). Effective
feedback systems facilitate knowledge exchange, reduce performance gaps, and strengthen employee
commitment, ultimately contributing to organizational effectiveness.
Similarly, communication timeliness was found to positively influence organizational performance. This result
aligns with previous studies suggesting that timely communication enhances organizational responsiveness,
coordination, and decision-making efficiency (Leonardi, 2021; Ruck & Men, 2021). In increasingly dynamic
work environments, prompt access to relevant information enables employees to execute tasks efficiently and
respond effectively to operational demands.
Collectively, these findings reinforce the growing body of literature that positions communication as a strategic
organizational resource. The results suggest that organizations seeking sustainable performance improvements
should adopt integrated communication practices that emphasize message clarity, structured feedback systems,
and timely information dissemination. Such practices strengthen employee engagement, improve coordination,
and enhance overall organizational effectiveness in competitive business environments.
CONCLUSION
This study investigated the influence of effective communication on organizational performance, focusing on
clarity of information, feedback mechanisms, and communication timeliness. The findings revealed that all three
dimensions of communication significantly enhance organizational performance. Specifically, clarity of
information was found to improve employees understanding of organizational goals, expectations, and
responsibilities, thereby facilitating effective task execution and reducing workplace ambiguity.
The study also established that feedback mechanisms have a significant positive effect on organizational
performance. Effective feedback systems enable organizations to align employee behavior with organizational
expectations, promote continuous learning, and strengthen employee engagement. The findings suggest that
organizations that encourage two-way communication are better positioned to improve productivity and
operational effectiveness.
Furthermore, communication timeliness was found to positively influence organizational performance. The
prompt dissemination of information enhances coordination, supports informed decision-making, and enables
employees to respond effectively to organizational demands. Timely communication therefore contributes to
improved efficiency and organizational responsiveness.
The study concludes that clarity of information, effective feedback mechanisms, and timely communication are
essential communication practices that drive organizational performance. Organizations seeking to improve
performance should prioritize transparent information sharing, establish structured feedback processes, and
ensure the timely flow of information across all levels of the organization. These communication practices will
strengthen employee engagement, improve coordination, and contribute to sustained organizational success.
Page 2343
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
REFERENCES
1. Anseel, F., Beatty, A. S., Shen, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2021). How are we doing after 30
years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal
of Management, 47(1), 151–180.
2. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
17(1), 99–120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
3. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
4. Boudrias, J. S., Gaudreau, P., Savoie, A., & Morin, A. J. S. (2022). Employee feedback environments
and workplace performance: The role of engagement and learning. Human Resource Management
Review, 32(3), 100823.
5. Carucci, R. (2022). Feedback culture and organizational effectiveness: The role of continuous
performance conversations. Harvard Business Review, 100(4), 76–84.
6. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
7. Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (2024). Communication clarity and employee engagement
in contemporary organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 61(1), 45–67.
8. Jiang, H., & Men, L. R. (2023). Internal communication and employee trust: Examining the role of
communication clarity and transparency. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(2),
201–218.
9. Kim, S. (2022). Communication management and organizational change effectiveness: The role of
strategic communication. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102172.
10. Kim, S., & Rhee, Y. (2020). Strategic communication and employee outcomes: Examining
organizational support and employee engagement. Journal of Communication Management, 24(3),
221–238.
11. Leonardi, P. M. (2021). COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: Digital communication
and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 247–251.
12. Mazzei, A., Kim, J. N., & Dell’Oro, C. (2023). Digital communication and organizational
performance: The role of timely information exchange. Corporate Communications: An International
Journal, 28(4), 587–603.
13. Men, L. R. (2020). The impact of transparent internal communication on employee trust and
engagement. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101880.
14. Men, L. R. (2021). Employee-centered communication and organizational effectiveness: Exploring
the role of strategic internal communication. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(3),
412–431.
15. Men, L. R., & Yue, C. A. (2021). Creating a positive communication environment: Effects on
employee engagement and organizational performance. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101994.
16. Ruck, K. (2021). Exploring internal communication: Towards informed employee voice. Routledge.
17. Ruck, K., & Men, L. R. (2021). Internal communication during crises: Employee communication and
organizational resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Communication Management, 25(3), 185–203.
18. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.).
Pearson Education.
19. Verčič, D. (2021). Internal communication: Definition, parameters, and the future. Public Relations
Review, 47(1), 102019.
20. Verčič, D., & Špoljarić, A. (2020). Managing internal communication for organizational effectiveness.
Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(4), 589–605.
21. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–
180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207