Page 2955
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Experimental Investigation of Carbon Dioxide Adsorbing Concrete
Blocks Incorporating Zeolite and Dunite as Sustainable Mineral
Admixtures
Manoj_Kumar H R
1
, Uday_Shankar S
2
, Pratigna_Prakash
3
1,2
Assistant Professor, Department Civil Engineering, SJCE, JSS STU, Mysore
3
Student, Department of Civil Engineering, SJCE, JSS STU, Mysore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600216
Received: 11 July 2026; Accepted: 16 July 2026; Published: 25 July 2026
ABSTRACT
The construction sector is facing growing challenges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by adopting
environmentally sustainable construction materials with lower carbon footprints. Among the emerging solutions,
carbon dioxide (CO₂)-adsorbing concrete has attracted considerable attention because of its ability to capture
atmospheric CO₂ while maintaining the engineering properties required for structural applications. This study
experimentally evaluates the potential of developing sustainable concrete blocks with enhanced CO₂ adsorption
capacity through the partial replacement of conventional materials with natural zeolite and Dunite. Concrete
mixes containing different replacement proportions were prepared and assessed for both fresh and hardened
properties. Workability, compressive strength, water absorption, and density were determined in accordance
with the relevant Indian Standard specifications. In addition, the CO₂ adsorption capacity of the concrete blocks
was evaluated to examine the effect of these mineral additives on carbon sequestration performance. The
findings reveal that incorporating zeolite and Dunite improves the CO₂ adsorption capability of concrete while
preserving satisfactory mechanical properties when used within optimal replacement limits. However, higher
replacement levels reduce workability and compressive strength, primarily due to increased pore volume and
weaker cementitious bonding within the concrete matrix. Overall, the results indicate that a balanced
combination of zeolite and Dunite can produce sustainable concrete blocks with enhanced carbon capture
potential and acceptable structural performance. The outcomes of this research provide valuable insights into
the development of eco-friendly construction materials that can contribute to carbon mitigation efforts while
supporting the long-term sustainability of the built environment.
Keywords: Sustainable concrete, Carbon sequestration, Zeolite, Dunite
INTRODUCTION
Concrete is increasingly being engineered to perform multiple functions beyond providing structural strength,
with growing emphasis on improving its environmental performance. One of the most promising developments
in this field is carbon dioxide (CO₂)-adsorbing concrete, which has the ability to capture atmospheric CO₂
through physical adsorption and mineral carbonation while continuing to meet the mechanical requirements of
conventional construction applications. By integrating carbon capture into cement-based materials, this approach
offers an effective means of reducing the environmental burden associated with the construction industry.
Among the various supplementary materials investigated for sustainable concrete production, natural mineral
admixtures have shown considerable potential in enhancing both durability and environmental performance.
Page 2956
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Natural zeolite, in particular, has been extensively studied because of its highly porous alumina silicate
framework, large specific surface area, and pozzolanic characteristics. Earlier research has demonstrated that
replacing a portion of cement with zeolite can improve long-term compressive strength, refine the internal pore
structure, and enhance durability through the formation of additional calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) gel.
Nevertheless, higher replacement levels often result in reduced workability and lower early-age strength due to
the material's greater water absorption capacity. More recently, zeolite has also been recognised as a suitable
candidate for improving the CO₂ adsorption behaviour of cementitious materials.
Magnesium-bearing silicate minerals, particularly Dunite, have also attracted attention because of their ability
to permanently store carbon dioxide through mineral carbonation reactions. Most published studies have
concentrated on the carbonation characteristics of Dunite and its application in carbon capture and storage
technologies. In comparison, relatively few investigations have explored its incorporation into concrete as a
sustainable constituent. Moreover, the combined use of zeolite and Dunite in cementitious composites has
received limited attention, especially in terms of achieving both enhanced mechanical performance and
improved CO₂ adsorption under normal curing conditions.
Considering these research gaps, the present study examines the development of carbon dioxide (CO₂)-adsorbing
concrete blocks by incorporating zeolite and Dunite as sustainable partial replacement materials. Concrete
mixtures with varying replacement levels were prepared and evaluated for workability, density, water
absorption, compressive strength, and CO₂ adsorption capacity to determine an optimum mix capable of
balancing structural performance with carbon sequestration efficiency. The findings are expected to provide a
better understanding of the combined influence of zeolite and Dunite and support the development of
environmentally sustainable cementitious materials with enhanced carbon capture capability.
MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
Materials
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) 53 grade conforming to IS 12269 was used as the primary cementitious binder
throughout the study. Natural river sand meeting the requirements of Zone II as specified in IS 383 was used as
the fine aggregate, while crushed granite coarse aggregate with a nominal maximum size of 20 mm, conforming
to IS 383, served as the coarse aggregate. The aggregates were carefully selected to satisfy the grading
requirements for conventional concrete and were confirmed to be free from harmful impurities. Potable water
was used for both mixing and curing to ensure consistency during the experimental programme.
Natural zeolite and Dunite were incorporated as sustainable mineral admixtures because of their distinct yet
complementary roles in carbon sequestration. Zeolite, a naturally occurring crystalline alumina silicate, was
chosen for its high specific surface area, porous structure, pozzolanic characteristics, and ability to adsorb
atmospheric CO₂. Dunite, a magnesium-rich silicate mineral predominantly composed of olivine, was included
because of its potential to chemically sequester CO₂ through mineral carbonation while also contributing to the
refinement of the concrete microstructure. The physical characteristics of all constituent materials used in this
investigation are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Physical Properties of Materials
Sl.No
Property
Cement
Fine Aggregate
Coarse
aggregate
zeolite
Dunite
Page 2957
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
1
Specific
gravity
3.06
2.55
2.59
2.30
3.20
2
Standard
consistency
(%)
32
-
-
-
-
3
Initial setting
time (min)
30
-
-
-
-
4
Bulk density
(kg/m
3
)
-
1750
1600
-
-
5
Water
Absorption (%)
-
1.0
0.5
22.5
0.3
Concrete Mix Design
The control concrete mix of M30 grade was designed in accordance with IS 10262:2019. Zeolite was used as a
partial replacement for cement at levels of 10%, 15%, and 20%, whereas Dunite was incorporated as a partial
replacement for fine aggregate at 10%, 15%, and 20%. Along with the control mix, seven modified mixtures
(10Z10D, 10Z15D, 15Z10D, 15Z15D, 15Z20D, 20Z15D, and 20Z20D) were prepared to examine the
combined effect of these mineral admixtures on the fresh, physical, mechanical, and CO₂ adsorption properties
of concrete. The replacement percentages were selected based on the optimum ranges reported in earlier studies,
while the water-to-binder ratio, aggregate proportions, and mixing procedure were kept identical for all mixes
to ensure a uniform basis for comparison.
Specimen Preparation
A total of eight concrete mixtures, including one control mix and seven modified mixes with different zeolite
and Dunite replacement levels, were prepared. Three concrete block specimens of dimensions 200 × 150 × 100
mm were cast for each mixture, giving a total of 24 specimens for the experimental programme. The control mix
comprised three specimens, while the remaining 21 specimens represented the seven modified mixes. The
average value of the three specimens was used to evaluate the engineering properties and CO₂ adsorption
performance of each concrete mixture. The mould used for specimen preparation and the concrete block after
demoulding are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Mould used for preparation of specimen and specimens after Demoulding
Curing Process
Page 2958
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
After Demoulding at 24 hours, the specimens were cured in potable water under laboratory ambient conditions
(27 ± 2°C) until the specified testing ages of 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. At the end of the curing period, the specimens
were removed from the curing tank, surface moisture was wiped off, and they were allowed to reach a saturated
surface-dry (SSD) condition under laboratory ambient conditions before weighing and testing. This procedure
was adopted to minimize the effect of free surface water on the measured specimen mass and to ensure consistent
comparison among all concrete mixtures.
Testing of Specimen
The experimental programme included slump, density, water absorption, compressive strength, and CO₂
adsorption tests to assess the influence of zeolite and Dunite on the fresh, physical, mechanical, and carbon
sequestration performance of concrete. The CO₂ adsorption capacity of the concrete blocks was determined from
the increase in specimen mass after curing. The amount of CO₂ adsorbed was calculated by relating the measured
mass gain to the molecular weight of carbon dioxide.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Properties of concrete in Fresh State
The workability of the concrete mixtures was evaluated using the slump cone test, and the corresponding results
are presented in Table 2. A gradual reduction in workability was observed with increasing replacement levels of
zeolite and Dunite. The control mixture recorded a true slump of 85 mm, while the slump reduced to 65 mm for
the mixture containing 20% zeolite and 20% Dunite. This decrease is mainly attributed to the porous structure
and high water absorption capacity of zeolite, which increases the water demand, along with the angular shape
of finely ground Dunite particles that increases internal friction within the concrete matrix. Despite the reduction
in slump, all mixtures exhibited a true slump, indicating adequate cohesion and workability for concrete block
casting.
Table 2: Test Results of Slump Cone Test
Mix ID
Zeolite (%)
Slump (mm)
Control mix
0
85
10Z10D
10
81
10Z15D
10
79
15Z10D
15
77
15Z15D
15
74
15Z20D
15
71
20Z15D
20
68
20Z20D
20
65
Page 2959
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Compression strength
The compressive strength results are presented in Table 3 and Figure 4. The concrete mixture containing 10%
zeolite and 10% Dunite achieved the highest compressive strength, representing a 15.77% increase compared
with the control concrete after 28 days of curing. This improvement is attributed to the pozzolanic activity of
zeolite, which enhances the formation of additional CSH gel, along with the filler effect of Dunite that
contributes to a denser concrete matrix. In contrast, increasing the replacement level to 20% zeolite and 20%
Dunite resulted in a 16.23% reduction in compressive strength relative to the control mix, mainly due to the
dilution of cementitious material and the lower formation of hydration products.
Figure 2: Indication of Compression Test
Table 3: Test Results of compression Test
Mix ID
7
th
day (N/mm
2
)
14
th
day
(N/mm
2
)
21
st
day (N/mm
2
)
28
th
day
(N/mm
2
)
Control mix
8.310
12.950
14.020
14.200
10Z10D
15.460
15.620
16.420
16.440
10Z15D
14.680
15.660
16.220
16.380
15Z10D
11.145
15.320
15.435
15.575
15Z15D
11.175
12.085
12.245
12.285
15Z20D
11.075
11.150
15.320
15.535
20Z15D
11.030
11.075
11.185
11.188
20Z20D
11.285
11.395
11.570
11.895
Page 2960
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 4: Variation of Compression strength of various mixes
Density
The density and estimated CO₂ uptake results are presented in Table 4 and Figure 5. The concrete mixture
containing 20% zeolite and 20% Dunite recorded the highest density, representing a 13.32% increase compared
with the control concrete. The corresponding estimated CO₂ uptake was 0.810 mol, indicating that the addition
of zeolite and Dunite improved the carbon sequestration capacity of the concrete. In addition, the strength
development of the zeolite-incorporated mixtures was more significant during the early curing period due to the
pozzolanic activity of zeolite, with only slight improvements observed beyond 7 days.
Table 4: Test Results of Density Test
0
5
10
15
20
7th 14th 21st 28th
COMPRESSIVE VALUE
(N/mm
2
)
DAYS
COMPRESSION STRENGTH TEST
1 (0%-0%)
2 (10%-10%)
3 (10%-15%)
4 (15%-10%)
5 (15%-15%)
6 (15%-20%)
7 (20%-15%)
Percentage
Initial Density
(kg/m
3
)
Final Density
(kg/m
3
)
Difference in
Density
(kg/m
3
)
Mass (kg)
Carbon
Adsorbed
(moles)
Control mix
2400.00
2272.33
-127.67
-0.3800
-8.63
10Z10D
2560.00
2563.66
3.66
0.0109
0.247
10Z15D
2586.66
2592.99
6.33
0.0190
0.431
15Z10D
2440.00
2449.66
9.66
0.0289
0.658
15Z15D
2140.00
2149.66
9.66
0.0289
0.658
15Z20D
2300.00
2310.56
10.56
0.0317
0.722
20Z15D
2513.33
2524.63
11.30
0.0339
0.772
20Z20D
2563.33
2575.19
11.86
0.0356
0.810
Page 2961
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 5: Variation of Density of Various Mixes
Adsorption of Carbon dioxide
The estimated CO₂ uptake of the concrete mixtures after 28 days of curing is presented in Figure 6. An increase
in CO₂ uptake was observed with higher replacement levels of zeolite and Dunite, with the 20% zeolite20%
Dunite mixture recording the maximum value of 0.810 mol. This improvement is attributed to the high
adsorption capacity of zeolite and the carbonation potential of magnesium-rich Dunite, demonstrating that their
combined incorporation enhances the carbon sequestration capability of concrete.
Figure 6: Carbon dioxide Adsorption of Various Mixes
CONCLUSION
1. This study examined the feasibility of producing CO₂-adsorbing concrete blocks by incorporating zeolite as
a partial replacement for cement and Dunite as a partial replacement for fine aggregate.
2. The concrete mixture containing 10% zeolite and 10% Dunite exhibited the best mechanical performance,
with a 15.77% increase in 28-day compressive strength compared with the control concrete, while further
increases in replacement levels led to a gradual decline in strength.
3. The estimated CO₂ uptake increased with increasing zeolite and Dunite content, and the 20% zeolite20%
Dunite mixture recorded the highest uptake of 0.810 mol, confirming the positive contribution of both
mineral admixtures to the carbon sequestration capacity of concrete.
-150
-100
-50
0
50
CHANGE IN DENSITY
(Kg/mm
2
)
DENSITY TEST
1 (0%-0%)
2 (10%-10%)
3 (10%-15%)
4 (15%-10%)
5 (15%-15%)
6 (15%-20%)
7 (20%-15%)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
CARBON DIOXIDE ADSORBED
(Moles)
PERCENTAGE REPLACEMENT
CARBON DIOXIDE ADSORPTION AT 28DAYS
carbon dioxide
Page 2962
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
4. The experimental results suggest that the combined incorporation of zeolite and Dunite is an effective
approach for producing sustainable concrete with enhanced environmental performance while retaining
satisfactory engineering properties.
5. Overall, the findings indicate that the mixture containing 10% zeolite and 10% Dunite offers the most
suitable balance between compressive strength and CO₂ uptake, demonstrating the potential of these
naturally occurring minerals in the development of environmentally sustainable concrete.
REFERENCE
1. British Cement Association. (2013). Properties of Portland pozzolana cement. British Cement
Association.
2. Indian Standards Institution. (1963). IS 2386 (Part 3): Methods of test for aggregates for concrete
Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking. Bureau of Indian Standards.
3. Indian Standards Institution. (1991). IS 1489 (Part 1): Portland pozzolana cementSpecification. Bureau
of Indian Standards.
4. Lee, Y. L., Koh, H. B., Alona, C. L., Ahmad Karim, A. T., Wimala, M., & Ng, C. (2018). CO₂ uptake
model of biomass silica foamed concrete. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
431(8), 082008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/431/8/082008
5. Madandoust, R., Sobhani, J., Ashoori, P., & Fakoor, M. (2014). The mechanical properties and durability
assessment of concrete containing natural zeolite as a highly reactive supplementary cementitious
material. Construction and Building Materials, 51, 329337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.054
6. Meyer, C. (2009). The greening of the concrete industry. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(8), 601
605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.010
7. Monkman, S., & Shao, Y. (2010). Assessing the carbon uptake of concrete during its service life. Cement
and Concrete Composites, 32(10), 817823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.09.004
8. Najimi, M., Sobhani, J., Ahmadi, B., & Shekarchi, M. (2012). An experimental study on durability
properties of concrete containing zeolite as a highly reactive natural pozzolan. Construction and Building
Materials, 35, 10231033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.038
9. Papadakis, V. G. (2000). Effect of supplementary cementing materials on concrete resistance against
carbonation. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(2), 291299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-
8846(99)00249-5
10. Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically
viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2
26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015
11. Snellings, R., Mertens, G., & Elsen, J. (2012). Supplementary cementitious materials. Reviews in
Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 74(1), 211278. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2012.74.6
12. Subramani, T., & Sumathi, C. (2015). Experimental investigation of partial replacement of cement with
fly ash and sand with bottom ash and glass used in concrete. International Journal of Application or
Innovation in Engineering & Management, 4(5), 245253.
13. Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J., Ramshaw, C., & Yeung, H. (2011). Post-combustion
CO₂ capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research and
Design, 89(9), 16091624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005
14. Yilmaz, B., & Uçar, A. (2011). Properties of zeolitic concrete containing natural zeolite as a
supplementary cementitious material. Construction and Building Materials, 25(11), 42704275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.026
15. Zhang, D., Shao, Y., & Ling, T. C. (2017). Carbonation curing of cement-based materials: A review.
Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 21, 119131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.07.003
Page 2963
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
16. Zhang, T., Castel, A., & François, R. (2009). Carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious
materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 39(12), 11801188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.07.01
17. Habert, G., Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Provis, J. L., Favier, A., Horvath, A., & Scrivener, K. L. (2020).
Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nature
Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), 559573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3
18. Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K., & Hooton, R. D. (2011). Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement
and Concrete Research, 41(12), 12441256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001
19. Pade, C., & Guimaraes, M. (2007). The CO₂ uptake of concrete in a 100-year perspective. Cement and
Concrete Research, 37(9), 13481356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.009
20. Sanjuán, M. Á., Andrade, C., Mora, P., & Zaragoza, A. (2020). Carbon dioxide uptake by cement-based
materials: A Spanish case study. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010339
21. Shi, C., Jiménez, A. F., & Palomo, A. (2011). New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an
alternative to Portland cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(7), 750763.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
22. Van den Heede, P., & De Belie, N. (2012). Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of
traditional and "green" concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations. Cement and Concrete
Composites, 34(4), 431442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004