www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3509
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Navigating Rising Living Costs: A Qualitative Study of Financial
Well-Being and Household Financial Decision-Making among
Working Professionals in Uttarakhand
Dr Ankit Kumar
Associate Professor, School of Business Studies, Jigyasa University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600259
Received: 10 July 2026; Accepted: 15 July 2026; Published: 03 August 2026
ABSTRACT
Rising living costs have become a major socioeconomic challenge, placing increasing pressure on household
financial stability and the financial well-being of working professionals. Although previous studies have
extensively examined inflation, household finance, and financial well-being using quantitative approaches,
limited attention has been paid to how individuals experience and manage rising living expenses in their
everyday lives, particularly in the regional contexts of developing economies such as India. This study explored
how rising living costs influence financial well-being and household financial decision-making among working
professionals in Uttarakhand.
The study employed an interpretivist research philosophy combined with an exploratory qualitative approach.
Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 25 working professionals from government and private-sector
organizations in Uttarakhand. Participants were purposefully chosen to ensure a variety of perspectives on
household financial management. The interview transcripts were manually analyzed through Braun and Clarke's
(2006) six-phase thematic analysis.
The study showed that rising living costs have greatly affected how households plan their budgets, prioritize
expenses, save money, make investment choices, and approach long-term financial planning. Participants
reported increased financial stress due to higher costs for housing, healthcare, education, transportation, and
other essential needs. To stay financially stable, they implemented various adaptive strategies such as stricter
budgeting, cutting back on discretionary expenses, building emergency savings, and finding additional sources
of income. Viewing these findings through the lens of the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT), it
becomes clear that households continuously adjust their financial resource management in response to changing
economic circumstances.
The study contributes to the household finance literature by extending the application of the Family Resource
Management Theory to the context of rising living costs and by providing qualitative evidence from Uttarakhand,
an underexplored region in India. The findings offer practical insights for policymakers, employers, financial
institutions, and financial educators seeking to strengthen household financial resilience and promote sustainable
financial well-being.
Keywords: Rising Cost of Living; Financial Well-being; Household Financial Behaviour; Financial Stress;
Family Resource Management Theory; Behavioral Finance; Consumption Theory; India; Uttarakhand
INTRODUCTION
In developing nations, rising household spending and inflation have drastically reshaped how salaried
households make financial decisions. Due to the widening gap between income growth and living costs, many
working professionals are under mounting financial strain despite steady jobs. Households in both developed
and developing countries face unprecedented financial strain from sharp increases in spending on housing, food,
healthcare, transportation, education, and utilities (Ruel et al., 2010). In many nations, economic expansion has
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3510
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
created new jobs, yet wage growth has often lagged behind rising living costs. Financial well-being is therefore
a growing concern for researchers, governments, employers, and financial institutions, as many salaried people
still face financial strain despite steady jobs. Because it reflects a person's ability to meet current financial
obligations while maintaining confidence in future financial stability, financial well-being has become a key
concept in household finance, behavioral economics, and consumer research. According to recent research,
financial well-being encompasses subjective assessments of financial stability, financial confidence, and the
capacity to make decisions that support an acceptable quality of life, as well as objective metrics such as wealth
or income. Higher financial well-being is typically associated with better psychological health, more effective
financial planning, and increased financial resilience (Hernandez-Perez & Cruz Rambaud, 2025).
On the other hand, declining financial well-being is associated with higher levels of financial stress, lower life
satisfaction, poorer mental health, and reduced work productivity (Netemeyer et al., 2018; CFPB, 2015; Diener
& Seligman, 2004). Understanding the factors that affect financial well-being has become increasingly
important for both academic study and public policy as households face rising living costs (OECD, 2020; World
Bank, 2022). The impact of rising living costs on household financial decision-making is one of the most
important effects (ILO, 2023; Lusardi et al., 2020). Households constantly distribute their limited financial
resources among conflicting demands, such as daily consumption, housing, healthcare, education, savings, debt
repayment, insurance, and long-term investments (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). These
choices are typically influenced by available income and financial objectives in stable economic times (Keynes,
1936; Friedman, 1957). However, households are often forced to adjust budgets, defer discretionary spending,
reduce savings, seek additional income, and reevaluate long-term financial goals during periods of persistent
inflation and economic instability (OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022; Mishkin, 2019). These adaptive financial
behaviors show that making financial decisions at home is not just an economic activity but also a behavioral
and social process shaped by personal beliefs, work circumstances, family obligations, and shifting economic
conditions (Thaler, 1999; Xiao, 2016; Becker, 1981).
In India, the rising cost of living is increasingly evident (Reserve Bank of India, 2023; World Bank, 2022).
Despite ongoing economic growth, rising employment, and higher household incomes (OECD, 2020; ILO,
2023), inflation continues to diminish purchasing power across income groups. The costs of housing, children's
education, healthcare, transportation, digital services, insurance, and other essential household needs are rising
for working professionals in both the public and private sectors (National Statistical Office (NSO), 2022; RBI,
2023). For many middle-class families, regular salary increases do not keep pace with rising living costs,
prompting a reassessment of financial priorities and the adoption of new household management strategies
(NCAER, 2021; OECD, 2022). Consequently, understanding how working professionals perceive their
financial security and adjust their financial decisions amid changing market conditions is increasingly important
(Lusardi et al., 2020; Xiao, 2016).
In Uttarakhand, where geographic diversity, urbanization, tourism-based economic activity, and a range of
employment prospects create distinct household financial conditions, the issue is especially pertinent
(Government of Uttarakhand, 2022; NITI Aayog, 2021). Costs for housing, children's education, healthcare,
transportation, digital services, insurance, and other essential household needs are rising in major cities such as
Dehradun, Haridwar, Haldwani, Rudrapur, and Rishikesh (RBI, 2023; NSO, 2022). However, households in hill
regions often face additional costs related to transportation, accessibility, and the availability of essential services
(Planning Commission, 2013; NITI Aayog, 2018). These geographic features suggest that working
professionals' financial experiences in Uttarakhand would differ from those documented in India's cities,
underscoring the need for context-specific research (Kumar & Subramanian, 2020; Mehta & Shah, 2019).
The existing literature has significantly advanced our understanding of consumer finance, household financial
behavior, financial literacy, and financial well-being (Brüggen et al., 2017; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Xiao &
O’Neill, 2016). Numerous studies show that income, financial knowledge, saving habits, debt management, and
financial planning positively affect financial well-being (Netemeyer et al., 2018; Kempson et al., 2017;
OECD, 2013). The effects of inflation and economic uncertainty on household spending, consumption patterns,
and financial resilience have also been examined (Mishkin, 2019; World Bank, 2022; OECD, 2022).
Nevertheless, most of these investigations have employed quantitative research methodologies, including
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3511
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
statistical modeling and structured questionnaires (Hair et al., 2019; Saunders et al., 2019). Although
quantitative methods are effective at identifying correlations between variables, they often offer little insight into
how people cope with financial difficulties, assess financial stability, manage household finances, and adjust
their financial behavior on a daily basis (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988).
The regional context of the existing literature is another drawback. Much of the available research draws on
nationally representative datasets, developed economies, or urban areas. Regional contexts such as Uttarakhand,
where employment structures, household duties, service accessibility, and cost-of-living patterns differ
significantly from those in major urban centers, have received relatively little attention (Nayyar, 2019; Tiwari
& Joshi, 2022). Additionally, prior research has typically treated financial stress, household financial decision-
making, and financial well-being as distinct areas of inquiry rather than examining how they relate during periods
of persistent increases in living costs. As a result, there is little qualitative data on how working professionals
negotiate household financial decisions, manage financial constraints, and maintain their financial well-being
amid shifting economic conditions.
The Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT) serves as the theoretical basis for this study and addresses
these gaps (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012; Parrotta & Johnson, 1998). The theory explains how
households respond to changing environmental conditions by acquiring, allocating, using, and managing scarce
resources. It emphasizes that, unlike discrete financial decisions, efficient household financial management
requires ongoing planning, prioritization, evaluation, and adaptation. FRMT provides a useful framework for
understanding how working professionals adjust household budgets, modify consumption habits, manage
financial stress, and develop coping mechanisms to preserve financial stability and overall well-being amid rising
living costs.
Therefore, this study investigates how rising living expenses affect household financial decision-making and
financial well-being among working professionals in Uttarakhand's public and private sectors (Creswell & Poth,
2018; Saunders et al., 2019; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). The study aims to produce rich insights into participants'
lived experiences, financial perceptions, decision-making processes, and adaptive strategies through semi-
structured interviews and an exploratory qualitative research design. In contrast to earlier survey-based studies,
this study focuses on how people interpret their financial experiences and the contextual elements that influence
household financial behavior.
The study contributes to the existing body of literature in four significant ways. First, it offers a comprehensive
understanding of how rising living expenses, financial well-being, household financial decision-making,
financial stress, and coping mechanisms are related within a unified qualitative framework (Brüggen et al., 2017;
Netemeyer et al., 2018).
Second, by illustrating how families manage scarce resources amid ongoing financial strain, it broadens the
application of the Family Resource Management Theory to the developing field of household financial research
(Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012).
Third, it provides context-specific qualitative evidence from Uttarakhand, an area with unique socio-economic
characteristics but little scholarly attention (Nayyar, 2019; Tiwari & Joshi, 2022).
Lastly, the results have practical implications for financial institutions, employers, financial educators, and
legislators seeking to improve household financial resilience through evidence-based policy interventions,
workplace financial wellness programs, and financial literacy programs (OECD, 2020; World Bank, 2022;
Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014).
Research Objectives:
This study's main objective is to investigate how rising living expenses affect working professionals' financial
well-being and household financial decision-making in Uttarakhand, India. In particular, the research aims to
accomplish the following goals:
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3512
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
1. To investigate how Uttarakhand's working professionals view their financial well-being.
2. To investigate how rising living expenses affect working professionals' household financial decision-
making.
3. To determine the financial difficulties and coping mechanisms employed by working professionals to
control home spending during times of increased living expenditures.
4. To comprehend how, in the face of shifting economic conditions, family, career, and demographic factors
influence household financial decisions.
5. To use the Family Resource Management Theory to gain a contextual understanding of household financial
decision-making and financial well-being.
Research Questions:
The following research questions direct the investigation in keeping with the qualitative and exploratory nature
of the study:
RQ1. In light of growing living expenses, how do working professionals in Uttarakhand view their financial
well-being?
RQ2. How have rising living expenses affected working professionals' household financial decision-making?
RQ3. In light of rising living expenses, what financial difficulties do working professionals face while handling
home finances?
RQ4: What coping mechanisms do working professionals utilize to preserve home well-being and financial
stability?
RQ5. How do socioeconomic circumstances, work-related factors, and family obligations affect working
professionals' financial decision-making?
Significance of the Study
By examining the real-life experiences of working professionals managing household finances amid an
increasingly difficult economic climate, this study advances both academic understanding and practical policy
(Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016; Brüggen et al., 2017). Most prior research has relied on
quantitative methods that primarily measure financial outcomes using standardized survey instruments, despite
growing scholarly attention to financial well-being. As a result, less attention has been paid to how people
negotiate household financial priorities, assess their financial circumstances, and adjust their financial behavior
during uncertain economic times (Xiao & O’Neill, 2016; Netemeyer et al., 2018). This study offers significant
contextual insights that supplement the available quantitative information through a qualitative approach.
From a theoretical standpoint, by analyzing how households distribute, prioritize, and manage scarce financial
resources amid ongoing cost-of-living pressures, the study expands the applicability of the Family Resource
Management Theory (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012; Parrotta & Johnson, 1998). It is
anticipated that the results will enhance our understanding of financial decision-making as a dynamic process
shaped by economic conditions, family obligations, job characteristics, and individual financial experiences.
By concentrating on Uttarakhand, a Himalayan state that has received very little scholarly attention in household
finance and financial well-being research, the study also makes a significant contextual addition (Nayyar, 2019;
Tiwari & Joshi, 2022; World Bank, 2022). The experiences of working professionals in Uttarakhand may not
be fully captured by information from metropolitan centers, given regional differences in employment patterns,
cost of living, geographic conditions, and household responsibilities. As a result, the current study adds location-
specific data to the body of knowledge regarding financial well-being in emerging economies.
Policymakers, employers, financial institutions, and financial educators can all benefit from the findings
(OECD, 2020; World Bank, 2022; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014). Insights into the financial difficulties and
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3513
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
coping mechanisms faced by working professionals can inform the creation of financial literacy programs,
workplace financial wellness initiatives, employee assistance programs, and evidence-based public policies that
improve household financial resilience. Organizations can create employee perks and support systems that
improve financial stability, productivity, and overall well-being by taking into account the financial realities of
working professionals (PwC, 2021; CFPB, 2017). Lastly, by providing evidence to guide future research, policy
development, and organizational practices to enhance financial well-being amid ongoing economic uncertainty,
the study contributes to the broader conversation on sustainable household financial management.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL/THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Rising Living Costs and Household Financial Behaviour
One of the biggest socioeconomic issues facing households globally is the rising cost of living (OECD, 2022;
World Bank, 2022; IMF, 2023). Consistent inflation, rising housing, healthcare, and education costs, unstable
energy markets, and disruptions in international supply chains have all contributed to a decline in household
purchasing power and increased financial strain that affects people of all income levels. All households are
affected by these economic shifts, but salaried professionals are especially affected because their income growth
often falls short of rising household expenses (ILO, 2023; OECD, 2020). To preserve economic stability,
households are forced to reevaluate their financial priorities, alter their spending patterns, and implement flexible
financial measures.
Household financial behavior refers to how individuals and families allocate, use, and manage available financial
resources to meet both short-term and long-term needs (Xiao & O’Neill, 2018; Netemeyer et al., 2018; OECD,
2020). Financial behavior encompasses saving, investing, debt management, financial planning, and
consumption choices, as well as regular budgeting and expenditure control. Current research indicates that
household financial behavior is influenced by psychological, social, and environmental factors—such as
perceptions of financial security, job stability, family responsibilities, and current economic conditions—as well
as by objective financial resources (Brüggen et al., 2017; CFPB, 2017; World Bank, 2022). To maintain financial
resilience and overall well-being, households continually adjust their financial behavior in response to changes
in the external economic environment (OECD, 2022; IMF, 2023).
In both industrialized and developing economies, persistent increases in the cost of living have dramatically
altered household financial behavior, according to recent empirical evidence (OECD, 2022; IMF, 2023; World
Bank, 2022). Rising spending on necessities has led to increased reliance on consumer credit, lower household
savings, delayed investment decisions, and reduced discretionary spending. In response, many households
reorganize their budgets, postpone major expenditures, seek additional sources of income, and reevaluate their
long-term financial objectives. Rather than a collection of discrete financial choices, these adaptive responses
indicate that household financial behavior is a dynamic process shaped by ongoing interactions between
economic conditions and household resource availability (Netemeyer et al., 2018; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018).
Due to ongoing inflation and rising costs of housing, transportation, healthcare, education, and digital services,
living expenses have become a serious concern in India (RBI, 2023; World Bank, 2022; OECD, 2020). Even as
household incomes and employment prospects have increased due to economic development, many working
professionals still face financial strain because wage growth has not kept pace with inflation (ILO, 2023; IMF,
2023). As a result, households face more difficult trade-offs among debt commitments, investment choices,
future savings, and current spending. For middle-class households, where juggling multiple financial obligations
has become increasingly difficult, these financial changes are especially pertinent.
The existing literature has largely relied on quantitative measures such as consumer price indices, household
spending surveys, or income–consumption correlations to study the economic effects of rising living costs, even
as inflation and household finance attract growing scholarly attention (OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022; IMF,
2023). Although these studies provide substantial macro-level evidence, they offer relatively little insight into
how people cope with financial stress day-to-day and how this affects household financial behavior (Xiao &
O’Neill, 2018; Netemeyer et al., 2018). This limitation is especially pronounced in rural contexts like
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3514
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Uttarakhand, where household obligations, work patterns, and geographic conditions may shape financial
decisions differently than in urban settings (Nayyar, 2019; Tiwari & Joshi, 2022). Therefore, a more thorough
understanding of how working professionals adjust to rising living costs and maintain financial stability amid
shifting economic conditions can be gained by analyzing household financial behavior through participants' lived
experiences (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016).
Inflation Impact on Household Financial Behaviour (2020–2025): Recent global and national evidence
highlights that inflation has significantly altered household financial behavior, particularly by reducing real
income and purchasing power. The ongoing cost-of-living crisis is characterized by rising prices for essentials
such as food, fuel, and housing outpacing wage growth, thereby constraining consumption and lowering living
standards. Empirical studies show that households respond to inflation by reducing discretionary spending,
prioritizing essential goods, and altering consumption patterns. Research on income shocks demonstrates that
fluctuations in income directly influence household consumption decisions, often leading to reduced spending
and increased financial caution.
In the Indian context, recent evidence indicates a sharp rise in household expenditure, with more than 58% of
households reporting difficulty managing expenses due to inflationary pressures. Rising food inflation and
essential costs disproportionately affect middle-income groups, who allocate a large share of their income to
necessities. Furthermore, macro-level trends show that despite economic growth, consumption patterns are
weakening, especially among the middle class, due to stagnant incomes and rising costs.
Financial Well-being and Household Financial Decision-Making
Because it reflects people's ability to manage their financial resources efficiently while preserving both current
and future financial security, financial well-being has become a key concept in household finance, behavioral
economics, and consumer research (Brüggen et al., 2017; CFPB, 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018). Contemporary
literature recognizes financial well-being as a multifaceted concept that extends beyond objective measures such
as income, wealth, or savings. It includes people's judgments of their financial security, confidence in handling
their financial responsibilities, ability to withstand unforeseen financial shocks, and ability to pursue long-term
financial objectives. As a result, financial well-being is increasingly viewed as an economic and psychological
outcome that affects family functioning, job performance, and overall quality of life (OECD, 2020; Xiao &
O’Neill, 2018).
Early research primarily relied on objective financial metrics, such as income, asset ownership, debt, and savings,
to measure financial well-being (Joo & Grable, 2004; Porter & Garman, 1993). Subsequent studies have shown
that people with similar financial resources often report different levels of perceived financial stability and
financial happiness (Diener & Oishi, 2000; Netemeyer et al., 2018). This shift has prompted scholars to
incorporate subjective factors into the conceptualization of financial well-being, including financial confidence,
financial worry, perceived control over personal finances, and expectations of future financial stability (Brüggen
et al., 2017; CFPB, 2017). The growing focus on subjective financial well-being acknowledges that people's
financial experiences are shaped not only by the resources at their disposal but also by how they perceive and
respond to their financial situation.
Because household financial decision-making is the process by which households allocate scarce financial
resources to meet competing demands and achieve financial objectives, it is closely linked to financial well-
being (Xiao & O’Neill, 2018; Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018). Budgeting, spending allocation,
borrowing, investing, saving, insurance planning, and retirement planning are examples of financial decisions.
These decisions reflect ongoing discussions among household members about current consumption, future
financial stability, and family duties rather than discrete economic choices. Households can therefore maximize
their resources and adapt to shifting economic conditions and unforeseen financial difficulties by making sound
financial decisions (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012).
Empirical studies have repeatedly shown a reciprocal association between household financial decision-making
and financial well-being (Joo & Grable, 2004; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). Stronger households are typically better
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3515
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
equipped to create structured budgets, keep emergency funds on hand, handle debt sensibly, and make
investments for long-term financial security. On the other hand, households facing financial instability frequently
make short-term financial choices characterized by lower savings, delayed investments, higher borrowing, and
greater reliance on credit to cover necessities (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Netemeyer et al., 2018). These results
imply that financial well-being serves as a resource that influences future financial behavior and household
decision-making in addition to being a result of prudent financial management.
This relationship has been exacerbated by the recent rise in living costs, which has further strained household
finances (OECD, 2022; IMF, 2023; World Bank, 2022). Rising costs for housing, healthcare, education,
transportation, and necessities have reduced disposable income, forcing many households to reevaluate their
financial priorities and change long-standing financial habits. According to research, families often respond by
cutting back on discretionary spending, postponing major purchases, adjusting their savings objectives, and
reallocating funds to necessities (OECD, 2020; ILO, 2023). These adaptive techniques often entail trade-offs
between current financial obligations and future financial objectives, even though they may help households
manage immediate financial stress. As a result, in settings marked by persistent inflation and economic
uncertainty, financial decision-making has grown more difficult.
The literature on behavioral finance also suggests that factors beyond economic resources influence household
financial decisions (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). How people
understand financial risks and allocate household resources is strongly shaped by several factors, including
financial literacy, financial self-efficacy, risk perception, future orientation, job stability, and family
responsibilities. Even among households with comparable income levels, psychological factors such as financial
worry and confidence can affect borrowing decisions, investment choices, saving habits, and budgeting
discipline (Netemeyer et al., 2018; Brüggen et al., 2017). This broader perspective emphasizes that household
financial behavior is influenced not solely by logical economic calculations but by a combination of financial
capability, behavioral traits, and environmental factors.
Strong family involvement and group responsibility are hallmarks of household financial decision-making in the
Indian context (Sundaram & Vanneman, 2008; Reserve Bank of India, 2023). Financial decisions often extend
beyond personal preferences to encompass long-term family security, healthcare, housing, elder care, marriage
costs, and children's education. These choices have become more difficult amid rising living costs, especially
for middle-class salaried households that must balance rising household expenses with comparatively stable
income growth (ILO, 2023; OECD, 2022). Budgeting practices, income stability, and financial literacy have
been found to be significant predictors of financial well-being in Indian studies (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014;
OECD, 2020). However, most studies rely on quantitative surveys that describe statistical correlations between
variables but offer little insight into how families manage uncertainty, negotiate financial priorities, and adjust
their financial behavior in day-to-day life (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016).
Despite earlier studies that significantly advanced our knowledge of household financial decision-making and
financial well-being (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018), several issues remain.
Much of the current work published examines these ideas separately rather than accounting for how they interact
dynamically amid rising living costs (OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022). Furthermore, the discipline is dominated
by quantitative approaches, which offer little insight into the financial discussions, adaptive strategies, and lived
experiences of working professionals under ongoing economic strain (Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam &
Tisdell, 2016). These constraints highlight the need for qualitative studies that can examine how household
financial decisions within particular socioeconomic circumstances are experienced, interpreted, and sustained.
To address these limitations, the current study examines household financial decision-making and financial well-
being as related processes rather than as distinct concepts (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). The
study aims to understand how working professionals in Uttarakhand manage competing financial obligations,
respond to rising living costs, and maintain financial well-being through routine household financial decisions.
It is guided by the Family Resource Management Theory. Using an exploratory qualitative methodology
(Saunders et al., 2019; Creswell & Poth, 2018), the research provides deeper insight into the contextual and
behavioral aspects of household finance that are often overlooked in survey-based studies. Financial Stress and
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3516
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Household Financial Well-being (2020–2025). Recent literature identifies financial stress as a critical outcome
of economic uncertainty, inflation, and income instability. Financial stress arises when households struggle to
meet financial obligations, often leading to anxiety, reduced well-being, and poor financial decision-making.
Post-COVID studies indicate that rising living costs, job insecurity, and declining savings have intensified
financial stress globally. In India, middle-class households are increasingly facing debt burdens, declining
savings rates, and greater reliance on credit, reflecting financial vulnerability.
Emerging research also shows that financial stress influences behavior, including reduced savings, increased
borrowing, and stricter budgeting. Additionally, financial instability is closely linked to psychological outcomes,
including anxiety and reduced financial confidence. Recent reports further highlight that middle-class
households are particularly vulnerable, often caught between rising aspirations and limited income growth,
leading to financial strain and mounting stress.
Family Resource Management Theory (Theoretical Foundation)
The Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT), developed by Deacon and Firebaugh (1988), serves as the
foundation for this study (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012; Parrotta & Johnson, 1998). It offers a
comprehensive framework for understanding how families obtain, allocate, use, and evaluate resources to
achieve personal and household objectives. According to the theory, households are dynamic systems that
continually engage with their internal and external contexts as they make choices about how to manage their
time, money, resources, and people. FRMT emphasizes that household resource management is an ongoing
process of planning, implementing, evaluating, and adapting to changing environmental conditions, rather than
viewing financial management as a collection of discrete economic decisions.
A fundamental tenet of FRMT is that household outcomes are shaped by both the amount of resources available
and the efficiency with which they are managed (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). Because of
differences in financial planning, budgeting practices, resource allocation, financial literacy, and decision-
making skills, families with comparable incomes may have varying degrees of financial well-being (Lusardi &
Mitchell, 2014; Netemeyer et al., 2018). Accordingly, the theory recognizes that both resource availability and
how households use them influence financial well-being. This perspective is especially relevant amid rising
living costs, when households must continually reassess their financial priorities, weigh competing demands,
and adjust their financial plans to maintain financial stability (OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022).
The use of FRMT has grown significantly in consumer behavior studies, family economics, and household
finance (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012; Parrotta & Johnson, 1998). The hypothesis has been used
in earlier research to explain family decision-making during uncertain economic times, household budgeting,
spending control, saving behavior, and financial resilience. More recent studies have extended its use to examine
how households reorganize spending, adjust savings, seek new sources of income, and update long-term
financial objectives in response to inflation, financial crises, and shifting labor market conditions (OECD, 2022;
World Bank, 2022; IMF, 2023). According to these studies, household financial behavior is an adaptive process
in which judgments about internal resource management are continually shaped by external economic
conditions.
Because it incorporates the main concepts examined in this study—rising living expenses, household financial
decision-making, financial well-being, financial stress, and coping mechanisms—FRMT offers a suitable
theoretical lens (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018). As living expenses rise, households face financial
challenges that require effective management of scarce resources. Financial decisions made in response to these
constraints shape perceptions of financial well-being and can also cause financial stress, prompting households
to use a variety of coping mechanisms (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). As a result, FRMT
explains not only how households respond to shifting economic conditions but also why families facing similar
external constraints achieve different financial outcomes (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012).
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3517
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The theoretical framework supporting this investigation is shown in Figure 1. The framework illustrates how an
external economic factor, rising living expenses (OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022), affects household financial
behavior. Through budgeting, spending planning, saving, borrowing, and other financial decisions, households
allocate and manage their financial resources in line with Family Resource Management Theory (Deacon &
Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). These actions ultimately determine a household's ability to maintain
financial resilience amid ongoing economic hardship and also affect financial well-being, financial stress, and
coping mechanisms (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). This framework
guides the interpretation of the empirical results and provides the conceptual foundation for understanding the
lived experiences of working professionals in Uttarakhand. The study proposes a conceptual linkage among cost
escalation, financial adaptation, and perceived well-being.
Empirical Evidence:
Over the past decade, empirical research on household finance has grown significantly amid shifting
employment conditions, inflationary pressures, and rising economic instability (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014;
OECD, 2022; World Bank, 2022). Research repeatedly shows that rising living costs undermine financial well-
being by eroding purchasing power, increasing household spending, and limiting families' ability to save and
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3518
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
invest for future needs (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018; IMF, 2023). Across socioeconomic groups,
these financial constraints are linked to heightened financial insecurity, declining financial confidence, and
greater vulnerability to unforeseen economic shocks (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 2017; OECD,
2022).
Additionally, studies have shown that prolonged inflation makes household financial decision-making more
difficult (IMF, 2023; World Bank, 2022). Households must reevaluate their financial priorities and reallocate
resources as costs for housing, healthcare, education, transportation, and other necessities continue to climb.
Typical behavioral responses documented in prior research include rationalizing spending, postponing
discretionary purchases, altering saving habits, relying more on consumer credit, and seeking additional sources
of income (Xiao & O’Neill, 2018; Lusardi et al., 2020; OECD, 2022). While these adaptive strategies help
households cope with short-term financial strains, they may also undermine long-term financial stability by
limiting investment and saving options (Mian, Straub, & Sufi, 2021; IMF, 2023).
According to studies in both developed and developing economies (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018;
Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014), economic resources, financial literacy, behavioral skills, job stability, and
psychological factors such as financial confidence and perceived financial control all affect financial well-being.
People with similar income levels often report different financial outcomes because of differences in financial
behavior, planning techniques, and resource management, even though households with higher financial
capability typically exhibit greater resilience during periods of economic uncertainty (Xiao & ONeill, 2018;
Kempson, Finney, & Poppe, 2017). These results support the claim that efficient household financial
management depends not only on available funds but also on how those funds are used and prioritized (Deacon
& Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012).
Empirical research in India has largely focused on consumer finance, financial inclusion, saving behavior, and
financial literacy (Reserve Bank of India, 2021; Agarwal et al., 2021). Prior research indicates that rising living
expenses have exacerbated financial difficulties for poor households, especially those from middle-class
backgrounds (Bhanumurthy et al., 2018; OECD, 2022). However, much of this evidence comes from national
datasets or quantitative surveys conducted in large cities. Regional contexts, such as Uttarakhand, where
topographical conditions, occupational arrangements, and household spending patterns may shape financial
experiences differently, have received relatively little attention (Planning Commission of India, 2013; NITI
Aayog, 2021).
Rising living expenses have a substantial impact on household financial behavior and well-being, according to
the empirical literature (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018; OECD, 2022). However, three significant
limitations remain. First, prior research has largely relied on quantitative methods, which has hampered our
understanding of the lived experiences that underlie household financial decisions (Xiao & O’Neill, 2018;
Kempson et al., 2017). Second, rather than examining the interconnectedness among financial stress, household
financial decision-making, and financial well-being, most current research has treated these topics as distinct
phenomena (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Netemeyer et al., 2018). Third, there remains a dearth of qualitative data
from local Indian contexts (Agarwal et al., 2021; Reserve Bank of India, 2021).
To address these constraints, the current study employs an exploratory qualitative methodology to provide a
context-specific understanding of how working professionals in Uttarakhand manage rising living costs and
make household financial decisions, drawing on the Family Resource Management Theory (Deacon &
Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). Indian Middle-Class Consumption Patterns (2020–2025): The Indian
middle class plays a crucial role in driving consumption; however, recent studies reveal significant structural
shifts in their financial behavior.
Recent evidence shows that:
Household consumption has grown over time, but recent trends indicate stagnation and reduced
discretionary spending
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3519
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Savings rates are declining, while household debt is increasing
Consumption is increasingly credit-driven rather than income-driven
Studies of urban households further reveal that financial behavior is influenced by income levels, employment
type, and access to financial instruments, thereby shaping saving and spending patterns.
Additionally, the Indian middle class is experiencing:
Increased financial pressure due to lifestyle expectations
Rising dependence on loans and EMIs
Greater vulnerability to economic shocks
Recent discussions also highlight that many middle-class households are struggling to balance consumption and
financial security, often leading to hidden financial stress and long-term instability.
Updated Mapping Table with Recent Literature (2020–2025)
Themes (Findings)
Linked Literature
Section
Conceptual Link / Justification (with Recent Studies)
Theme 1Increasing
Financial Strain Due to
Inflation
2.1 Rising Living
Costs and
Household
Financial
Behaviour
Recent studies confirm that inflation significantly erodes
purchasing power and reshapes household consumption
patterns. Research shows households reduce discretionary
spending and shift toward essential goods during
inflationary periods (Baker et al., 2020; Coibion et al.,
2022). In the Indian context, rising food and fuel prices
have disproportionately affected middle-class households,
leading to constrained consumption and increased financial
pressure (Reserve Bank of India, 2023; Kumar & Mishra,
2022). This directly aligns with participantsexperiences of
rising expenditure and reduced purchasing capacity.
Theme 2: Financial
Prioritization; Budget
Adjustment; Saving
Behavior
2.2 Financial Well-
being and
Household
Financial Decision-
Making
Literature highlights that financial stress triggers
behavioral adjustments such as expenditure prioritization,
budget restructuring, and precautionary savings.
Households adopt adaptive financial strategies to manage
uncertainty (Hanspal et al., 2021; Carvalho et al., 2020). In
India, middle-class households increasingly reallocate
spending toward necessities and reduce savings or shift
toward safer financial instruments during economic
instability (Bapat, 2020; RBI, 2023). These findings
strongly support observed patterns of financial
prioritization and budgeting behavior.
Theme 3: Financial
Security; Financial
Confidence
2.2 Financial Well-
being and
Household
Financial Decision-
Making
Research on financial well-being identifies financial
security and confidence as key subjective indicators shaped
by income stability and economic conditions. Studies post-
COVID show a decline in perceived financial security and
confidence due to uncertainty and inflationary pressures
(OECD, 2021; CFPB, 2022). In emerging economies like
India, financial confidence is closely tied to employment
stability and savings adequacy (Lusardi et al., 2020). This
aligns with participants perceptions of financial stability
and future outlook.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3520
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Theme 4: Financial
Anxiety; Family
Responsibilities
2.3 Family Resource
Management
Theory (Theoretical
Foundation)
Family Resource Management Theory explains how
households allocate limited financial resources under
constraints, often leading to stress and anxiety. Recent
research highlights increased financial anxiety due to rising
living costs, particularly among households with
dependents (Prawitz et al., 2021; Xiao & O’Neill, 2021).
In India, family obligations such as education, healthcare,
and caregiving intensify financial stress in middle-class
households (Mehrotra & Parida, 2021). This supports the
observed link between financial anxiety and family
responsibilities.
Theme 5: Adaptive
Coping; Financial
Resilience
2.3 Family Resource
Management
Theory + 2.4
Empirical Evidence
Both theory and empirical studies emphasize resilience as
a key outcome of financial coping mechanisms.
Households adopt strategies such as income
diversification, expense control, and financial planning to
manage economic shocks (Masten & Motti-Stefanidi,
2020; Kira & Shuwailan, 2022). Post-pandemic evidence
shows increased reliance on digital finance, informal
support systems, and adaptive budgeting among Indian
households (Borker, 2021; RBI, 2023). These findings
align with participants' demonstrated financial resilience
and coping strategies.
Research Gap and Study Contribution
Rising living expenses significantly affect household financial behavior, well-being, and decision-making,
according to the literature now in print (Brüggen et al., 2017; Netemeyer et al., 2018; OECD, 2022; IMF, 2023).
The importance of resource management, budgeting techniques, income stability, and financial literacy in
shaping household financial outcomes has been noted in earlier research (Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; Xiao &
O’Neill, 2018; Kempson et al., 2017). However, a thorough understanding of how households respond to
persistent economic pressures is hampered by several shortcomings in the current body of evidence.
First, most studies to date have relied on quantitative methods, primarily statistical models and structured
surveys, to examine financial behavior. While these methods reveal correlations among financial variables, they
offer limited insight into the perceptions, lived experiences, and adaptive decision-making processes of people
facing rising living costs (Xiao & O’Neill, 2018; Kempson et al., 2017). Second, prior studies have largely
treated financial stress, household financial decision-making, and financial well-being as separate concepts,
paying little attention to how they relate within the broader framework of household resource management
(Netemeyer et al., 2018; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014). Third, despite their unique socioeconomic traits,
employment trends, and cost-of-living challenges, there remains a dearth of empirical data from regional
contexts in India, particularly in Himalayan states such as Uttarakhand (Agarwal et al., 2021; Reserve Bank of
India, 2021; NITI Aayog, 2021).
To address these constraints, the study adopted an exploratory qualitative methodology grounded in the Family
Resource Management Theory (FRMT) to examine how working professionals in Uttarakhand cope with rising
living costs and manage household finances (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012). The study extends
the application of FRMT in current household finance research by treating financial well-being, household
financial decision-making, financial stress, and coping mechanisms as interrelated aspects of household resource
management (Brüggen et al., 2017; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018).
The study makes three significant contributions. Theoretically, it advances the application of Family Resource
Management Theory to explain how households adjust their finances amid ongoing economic strain (Deacon &
Firebaugh, 1988; Goldsmith, 2012; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). Empirically, it provides context-specific qualitative
data from Uttarakhand, a region that has received little scholarly attention (Agarwal et al., 2021; Reserve Bank
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3521
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
of India, 2021; NITI Aayog, 2021). For policymakers, employers, financial educators, and financial institutions
seeking to create programs that strengthen financial resilience and improve the financial well-being of working
professionals, the findings offer useful insights (OECD, 2022; Brüggen et al., 2017).
The literature review reveals substantial methodological, theoretical, and contextual gaps while highlighting the
growing importance of understanding household financial behavior amid rising living costs (Netemeyer et al.,
2018; Lusardi & Mitchell, 2014; IMF, 2023). To close these gaps, people's lived experiences must be thoroughly
examined (Kempson et al., 2017; Xiao & O’Neill, 2018). The following section describes the qualitative
approach used to examine financial well-being and household financial decision-making among working
professionals in Uttarakhand.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To examine the impact of rising living costs on the financial well-being and household financial decision-making
of working professionals in Uttarakhand, India, this study adopts a qualitative research design grounded in an
interpretivist paradigm. This approach is theoretically informed by the premise that financial behaviors and
perceptions are socially constructed, contextually embedded, and shaped by subjective interpretations of
economic realities (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Unlike positivist frameworks, which emphasize objectivity,
measurement, and generalizability, interpretivist inquiry facilitates a deeper understanding of how individuals
construct meaning around financial stress and adapt their decision-making within dynamic socio-economic
environments (Creswell & Poth, 2018).
Qualitative research is particularly well-suited to exploring complex, under-theorized phenomena, such as the
lived experiences of financial strain and adaptive household strategies amid inflationary pressures. While
quantitative methods effectively identify statistical relationships among variables, they often fail to capture the
nuanced, process-oriented, and experiential dimensions of financial decision-making (Denzin & Lincoln, 2018).
In contrast, the qualitative approach used in this study enables a critical examination of how working
professionals negotiate competing financial priorities, manage resource constraints, and reinterpret financial
well-being in response to rising living costs.
Furthermore, this methodological choice aligns with theoretical perspectives on household financial behavior
and resource management that conceptualize financial decision-making as an adaptive, iterative process shaped
by constraints, preferences, and contextual factors. The study uses a purposive sampling strategy to select 25
participants, ensuring relevance and depth of insight. The sample size is consistent with qualitative research
standards and is justified by the principle of data saturation, in which data collection ceases once no new themes
or insights emerge (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006). This enhances the study's credibility, trustworthiness, and
analytical rigor, aligning with established criteria for qualitative validity, including credibility, dependability, and
confirmability (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). While this study adopts a qualitative cross-sectional design to explore
lived experiences, future studies may benefit from longitudinal approaches to examine temporal changes in
financial behavior and adaptation strategies.
Research Philosophy and Research Design:
The interpretivist research philosophy, which holds that people's experiences and interactions shape social
reality, serves as the study's compass. Household financial decision-making and financial well-being are
subjective phenomena that vary with individual circumstances, family obligations, work environments, and
broader socioeconomic contexts. Therefore, rather than relying solely on objective financial metrics,
understanding these experiences requires direct contact with people.
The study employs an exploratory qualitative design and an inductive approach, consistent with the interpretivist
viewpoint. It aims to gain a thorough understanding of how working professionals cope with rising living costs
and manage household finances, rather than testing preconceived notions. The Family Resource Management
Theory (FRMT), which provides a conceptual lens for understanding how households acquire, allocate, use, and
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3522
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
assess available resources in response to shifting economic conditions, serves as the study's theoretical
foundation.
Study Area and Participants:
The study was conducted in the Indian state of Uttarakhand, which is known for its diverse employment,
economic, and topographical conditions. Households in both urban and semi-urban areas are facing financial
difficulties due to rising costs of housing, healthcare, transportation, education, and other necessities. Therefore,
the study focuses on working professionals who live in districts that are important administrative, educational,
industrial, and commercial hubs in the state, such as Dehradun, Haridwar, Haldwani, Rudrapur, and Rishikesh.
Employees in the public and private sectors who actively manage household finances constitute the target
audience. Participants were chosen because they frequently make financial decisions that directly affect their
households' financial well-being, such as budgeting, spending planning, saving, investing, and managing debt.
Sampling Strategy
Purposive sampling was used to identify people with extensive knowledge who could provide in-depth
explanations of the phenomenon under study. In qualitative research, purposive sampling is often recommended
when participants have particular experiences relevant to the study's goals. Participants were selected from a
range of age groups, genders, family backgrounds, and occupational sectors to ensure a diversity of viewpoints.
The following requirements had to be met for participation:
1. employment in the public or private sector;
2. at least three years of work experience;
3. regular income; and
4. active participation in household financial decision-making. These requirements ensured that
participants had sufficient experience to discuss the financial effects of rising living costs.
Sampling Limitation:
While purposive sampling facilitated the selection of information-rich participants—specifically working
professionals directly experiencing rising living costs—it inherently limits the breadth of representation across
occupational categories, income strata, and socioeconomic backgrounds within Uttarakhand. As a nonprobability
sampling strategy, it prioritizes depth, contextual richness, and relevance over statistical representativeness;
consequently, the findings are analytically robust but not intended for population-level generalization (Creswell
& Poth, 2018; Patton, 2015). To partially mitigate this limitation, elements of maximum variation sampling were
incorporated by intentionally including participants from diverse income levels, professions, and family
structures, thereby enhancing the heterogeneity of perspectives within the sample (Patton, 2015).
From a critically reflexive standpoint, this methodological choice also shapes the knowledge produced in this
study. By focusing primarily on formally employed professionals, the research may inadvertently privilege
relatively stable, visible, and institutionally embedded financial experiences, while underrepresenting the more
precarious, informal, or marginalized economic realities within Uttarakhand's broader socio-economic
landscape. Although maximum variation sampling sought to broaden representation, it cannot fully overcome
the structural exclusion of certain groups, particularly those outside formal employment systems. This selective
visibility has implications for how financial well-being and household financial decision-making are
conceptualized and interpreted, reinforcing the need for reflexivity in qualitative inquiry (Denzin & Lincoln,
2018).
Within the study’s conceptual framework—where financial well-being is understood as a multidimensional
construct influenced by income stability, cost pressures, and subjective financial perceptions, and household
financial decision-making is viewed as an adaptive process constrained by limits—the sample’s limitations
become more pronounced. Variations in employment security, access to financial resources, and vulnerability to
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3523
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
inflationary shocks are likely to differentially shape both financial well-being and decision-making strategies.
While the inclusion of diverse participant profiles through maximum variation sampling enhances analytical
depth, these variations may still not be fully captured due to the sample’s bounded, non-probabilistic nature.
Furthermore, the framework assumes dynamic, context-sensitive interactions between rising living costs and
household financial adjustments; yet the methodological focus may limit how fully structurally embedded
inequalities—such as urban–rural disparities or formal–informal sector divides—are theorized in the findings.
As such, the study’s conclusions should be interpreted as contextually situated and theoretically generative,
contributing to analytical generalization and conceptual refinement rather than universal claims. This reflexive
acknowledgment strengthens the research's transparency, rigor, and epistemological coherence, in line with
established qualitative standards of trustworthiness, including credibility and transferability (Lincoln & Guba,
1985). A key limitation of the present study is its cross-sectional design, which captures financial experiences at
a single point in time. Because financial well-being and decision-making are dynamic processes, a longitudinal
approach would provide deeper insights into how coping strategies evolve over time amid changing economic
conditions.
A key limitation of the present study is its cross-sectional design, which captures financial experiences at a single
point in time. Because financial well-being and household financial decision-making are inherently dynamic,
future research could adopt a longitudinal design to examine changes over time. Longitudinal approaches enable
researchers to track evolving behavioral patterns, causal relationships, and adaptive coping strategies across time
(Creswell & Poth, 2018; Menard, 2002). This would be particularly valuable for understanding how financial
resilience and decision-making processes develop in response to sustained inflationary pressures and economic
uncertainty.
Data Collection
The study employed thematic analysis to explore patterns in qualitative data (Braun & Clarke, 2006). This choice
aligned with the interpretivist framework and aimed to understand participants' experiences with rising living
costs and financial well-being. Data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using this well-established,
rigorous, and adaptable method to identify, examine, and interpret key themes.
All interviews were first transcribed verbatim. Interviews conducted in Hindi were carefully translated into
English to ensure analytical consistency while preserving the original meaning and context of participants
responses. To enhance accuracy, transcripts were cross-checked against audio recordings and field notes.
The data analysis followed a systematic six-step process.
1. Familiarization with Data: The researcher repeatedly read the transcripts to develop a deep understanding of
participantsexperiences, noting initial ideas and observations.
2. Generating Initial Codes: Open coding identified meaningful segments of data. Codes were both data-driven
(inductive) and theory-informed (deductive), with particular guidance from the Family Resource Management
Theory (FRMT).
3. Searching for Themes: Related codes were grouped into broader categories to form initial themes. For
example, codes such as “increased expenses,” “reduced savings,and “budget adjustmentswere grouped
under the category of financial strain.
4. Reviewing Themes: Themes were reviewed and refined to ensure internal consistency and clear distinctions
between them. This step ensured that the themes accurately reflected the dataset.
5. Defining and Naming Themes: Final themes and sub-themes were clearly defined and aligned with the
research objectives. Key themes included financial strain, financial stress, coping strategies, and financial
decision-making.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3524
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
6. Interpretation and Reporting: The themes were interpreted in light of FRMT, Behavioral Finance, and
Consumption Theory, enabling a deeper understanding of how households adapt to rising living costs.
To enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the analysis, several strategies were employed. Triangulation
was achieved by integrating interview data with field notes and existing literature. Member sensitivity was
maintained by ensuring that interpretations accurately reflected participants perspectives. Additionally, peer
review and iterative coding helped minimize researcher bias.
Data collection and analysis were conducted simultaneously, allowing emerging themes to inform subsequent
interviews. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached, at which point no new significant
patterns or insights emerged.
Future Scope
The present study aimed to explore how rising living costs influence financial well-being and household financial
decision-making among working professionals in Uttarakhand. Building on these objectives, several avenues for
future research emerge that can deepen, validate, and extend the current findings.
First, to understand the impact of rising living costs on financial well-being, future studies could conduct
comparative analyses across Indian states. Given that Uttarakhand represents a unique socio-economic context
marked by urban–rural transitions and regional cost-of-living disparities, such research would help determine
whether the patterns identified in this study are context-specific or reflect broader national trends. Such work
would strengthen the external validity and generalizability of the identified conceptual relationships.
Second, to examine household financial decision-making processes, future research could use quantitative or
mixed-methods approaches to test the conceptual framework developed in this study. Advanced statistical
techniques, such as Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), would
enable researchers to validate the multidimensional constructs of financial well-being and empirically assess the
causal pathways linking cost-of-living pressures to financial decision-making behaviors.
Third, given the study’s focus on working professionals, future research could broaden its scope to include
informal-sector workers, rural households, and economically vulnerable populations. This would provide a more
inclusive understanding of financial well-being and decision-making across diverse socioeconomic groups,
particularly those who may face more acute financial constraints and limited access to formal financial systems.
Such expansion would directly address the current study’s sampling boundaries and enhance the framework's
theoretical comprehensiveness.
Fourth, to capture lived financial experiences amid changing economic conditions, future studies could adopt
longitudinal designs to examine how financial well-being and household decision-making evolve over time. This
approach would be particularly valuable for understanding the long-term effects of sustained inflation, policy
interventions, or economic shocks, thereby contributing to a more dynamic, process-oriented understanding of
financial behavior.
Finally, future research could extend the study’s conceptual framework by incorporating additional theoretical
perspectives, such as behavioral economics, financial capability theory, and resilience frameworks. This would
enable a more integrated analysis of the cognitive, psychological, and structural determinants of financial
decision-making, thereby advancing both theoretical development and practical relevance.
Future research could adopt a longitudinal design to capture the dynamic nature of financial well-being and
household financial decision-making. A longitudinal approach would allow researchers to track changes in
financial coping strategies over time, particularly in response to persistent inflationary pressures, policy shifts,
and economic uncertainties.
Overall, this analytical approach ensured a robust, transparent, and theory-driven interpretation of the qualitative
data, yielding meaningful insights into household financial behavior amid rising living costs.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3525
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Data Analysis
The data collected through semi-structured interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, following Braun
and Clarke’s (2006) six-phase framework. This method was selected for its flexibility, suitability for identifying
patterns in qualitative data, and alignment with the study’s interpretivist approach.
All interviews were transcribed verbatim, and those conducted in Hindi were carefully translated into English to
ensure analytical consistency while preserving the original meaning and context. The researcher engaged in
manual coding, which facilitated close engagement with the data and a deeper understanding of participants
lived financial experiences. This approach also enabled the identification of subtle patterns and context-specific
insights that may not emerge from automated coding techniques.
The analytical process followed six systematic steps:
1. Familiarization with the Data: Interview transcripts were read multiple times to gain an in-depth
understanding of participantsresponses, supported by field notes and initial observations.
2. Generating Initial Codes: Preliminary codes were developed by identifying meaningful segments of data.
A hybrid coding approach was used, combining inductive (data-driven) coding with deductive (theory-
informed) coding based on the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT).
3. Searching for Themes: Codes were grouped into broader categories to identify emerging themes related
to financial behavior, financial stress, coping strategies, and decision-making processes.
4. Reviewing and Refining Themes: Themes were critically examined to ensure internal consistency,
coherence, and clear differentiation. Redundant or overlapping themes were merged or eliminated to
enhance clarity.
5. Defining and Naming Themes: Each theme was clearly defined and aligned with the research objectives.
The thematic structure reflected key dimensions, including financial strain, adaptive financial strategies,
and perceived financial well-being.
6. Developing the Interpretive Narrative: An analytical narrative was constructed by integrating themes
with representative participant quotes, ensuring that findings remained grounded in participants lived
experiences.
Throughout the analysis, the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT) served as the primary theoretical
lens for interpreting how households allocate and manage financial resources under economic pressure. In
addition, insights from Behavioral Finance (e.g., mental accounting, perceived financial stress) and Consumption
Theory were incorporated to provide a more comprehensive understanding of financial decision-making amid
rising living costs.
To address potential methodological limitations and enhance rigor, several strategies were implemented.
Reflexivity was maintained by continuously acknowledging the researcher’s role in interpretation. Peer
debriefing and iterative coding were used to reduce subjective bias and improve analytical consistency.
Additionally, data triangulation was achieved by integrating interview data with field notes and existing
literature. Data collection and analysis were conducted concurrently, allowing emerging insights to inform
subsequent interviews. The process continued until thematic saturation was achieved, at which point no new
significant themes emerged, ensuring the depth and completeness of the findings.
Overall, this analytical approach ensures a systematic, transparent, and theoretically grounded interpretation of
the data, strengthening the study’s validity and credibility.
Trustworthiness and Ethical Considerations:
To ensure methodological rigor, this study adhered to the four criteria of trustworthiness proposed by Lincoln
and Guba (1985): credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Several systematic strategies
were employed to strengthen each of these dimensions.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3526
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Credibility was enhanced through prolonged engagement with participants and the data, allowing for a deeper
understanding of their financial experiences. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were
repeatedly reviewed alongside audio recordings and field notes to ensure accuracy. Additionally, iterative data
analysis—in which emerging themes were continuously compared with the raw data—helped ensure that the
findings authentically represented participantsperspectives.
Transferability was supported by providing thick descriptions of the research context, including the socio-
economic background of participants, the study setting (Uttarakhand), and detailed methodological procedures.
This enables readers to assess the applicability of the findings to other contexts with similar characteristics.
Dependability was ensured by maintaining a comprehensive audit trail that documented all stages of the research
process, including interview procedures, coding decisions, theme development, and analytical reflections. This
systematic documentation enhances transparency and allows for potential replication or methodological review.
Confirmability was strengthened through researcher reflexivity and efforts to minimize subjective bias. The
researcher maintained reflective notes throughout the study to acknowledge personal assumptions and their
potential influence on interpretation. Furthermore, the use of verbatim participant quotations in the findings
ensured that interpretations remained grounded in the data. Peer debriefing and iterative coding were also
employed to enhance analytical neutrality and consistency.
Ethical standards were strictly maintained throughout the research process. Participants were fully informed
about the purpose, scope, and voluntary nature of the study prior to participation. Informed consent was obtained
from all participants, ensuring that they clearly understood their rights.
To protect privacy, confidentiality and anonymity were maintained by assigning identification codes (e.g., P1,
P2, P3) instead of using personal identifiers. Participants were also informed of their right to decline any question
or withdraw from the study at any stage without any consequences.
All interview recordings and transcripts were securely stored and used exclusively for academic purposes. Data
handling complied with institutional research ethics guidelines. The study adhered to the university's ethical
standards for research involving human participants, ensuring integrity, respect, and the protection of participants
FINDINGS
Participant Profile:
25 working professionals from Uttarakhand's public and private sectors participated in the survey. Because the
participants' ages, occupations, genders, and levels of work experience varied, they offered diverse perspectives
on managing household finances.
Characteristic
Distribution
Government Sector
12
Private Sector
13
Male
14
Female
11
Age Range
28–56 years
Average Experience
11 years
Overview of Themes
As shown below, the thematic analysis identified 15 supporting subthemes and 5 main topics.
Sub-themes
Increasing Financial Strain Due to Inflation
Reduced savings
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3527
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Lifestyle adjustments
Debt dependency
Financial Prioritization; Budget Adjustment; Saving Behavior
Financial Security; Financial Confidence
Financial Anxiety; Family Responsibilities
Adaptive Coping; Financial Resilience
Theme 1: Increasing Financial Strain Due to Inflation
Participants consistently reported experiencing heightened financial strain due to rising inflation and the
increasing cost of living. Essential household expenditures—particularly on food, housing, healthcare,
transportation, and children’s education—have risen significantly in recent years. Although most participants
indicated stable employment, they emphasized that income growth has not kept pace with escalating expenses,
resulting in reduced financial flexibility.
One participant noted:
“Earlier we could save a reasonable amount every month, but now grocery prices, school fees, and electricity
bills have increased so much that most of our income goes towards essential expenses.” (P7, Government
Worker)
Another participant stated:
“We have to update our household budget each month due to rising costs. We now just purchase necessities.”
(P12, Private Sector Employee)
These responses illustrate a clear shift in financial behavior, with households compelled to prioritize essential
consumption and reduce discretionary spending.
From a theoretical perspective, this aligns with Family Resource Management Theory, which posits that
households continuously adjust resource allocation in response to external pressures, such as inflation. Rising
living costs act as economic constraints, forcing families to re-evaluate spending priorities and optimize limited
financial resources.
At the macro level, this trend is supported by recent data. India’s retail inflation rose to 4.38%, largely driven by
increases in food and essential commodity prices (MoSPI, 2026). Additionally, data from the National Sample
Survey Office (NSSO) indicate a significant rise in household consumption expenditure, particularly on non-
food essentials such as transport, clothing, and services (MoSPI, 2024). These trends suggest a broader decline
in purchasing power, as rising prices outpace income growth (MoSPI, 2024; 2026).
Theme 1.1: Reduced Savings
A prominent consequence of rising inflation is the decline in household savings. Participants frequently reported
that rising monthly expenditures leave little to no surplus for savings. Financial reserves, which once provided
security against emergencies, are now being depleted to cover routine expenses. This decline in savings reflects
a shift from future-oriented financial planning to meeting current consumption needs, driven by necessity rather
than choice. Empirical studies have similarly found that inflation reduces real disposable income, thereby
limiting householdscapacity to save (Reserve Bank of India [RBI], 2023; World Bank, 2022).
Theme 1.2: Lifestyle Adjustments
Participants also highlighted significant lifestyle changes as a coping strategy. These adjustments include
reducing discretionary spending, postponing major purchases, limiting leisure activities, and choosing lower-
cost alternatives in daily consumption.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3528
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Such behavioral changes indicate a shift toward austerity-driven consumption patterns, in which households
focus primarily on essential goods and services. This is consistent with existing literature, which suggests that
rising living costs lead to consumption smoothing and prioritization of necessities (OECD, 2021).
As noted by participants, the need to frequently revise household budgets further reflects the dynamic nature of
financial decision-making under economic pressure.
Theme 1.3: Debt Dependency
Another significant observation is the escalating dependence on credit and debt to address financial shortfalls.
Participants stated that when income is insufficient to meet rising expenses, borrowing becomes an essential
strategy for sustaining household consumption.
This growing dependence on debt underscores a structural vulnerability: households rely on external financial
resources to sustain their standard of living. Studies in the Indian context have similarly reported a rise in
household indebtedness, particularly among middle-income groups, due to inflationary pressures and stagnant
wages (RBI, 2023).
While debt provides short-term relief, it may contribute to long-term financial instability and stress, reinforcing
the cycle of financial strain. India’s retail inflation rose to 4.38%, driven by food and essential goods, signalling
increasing cost-of-living pressures (MoSPI, 2026). NSSO data show a significant rise in household consumption
expenditure, with increased spending on non-food essentials such as transport, clothing, and services (MoSPI,
2024). These findings reflect broader macroeconomic trends, in which rising inflation (4.38%) and rising
expenditure on essential and non-essential items have reduced household purchasing power (MoSPI, 2024;
2026).
Theme 2: Household Financial Decision-Making Becomes More Strategic
According to the participants, financial decisions at home have become more thoughtful and cooperative.
Regular home procedures included budgeting, planning expenses, and setting priorities for necessities. Many
participants said that family members now discuss purchases before making large purchases.
One participant clarified:
"In the past, we made a lot of impulsive purchases. My partner and I now analyze every significant expense since
we need to consider our future obligations." (P4, Bank Employee)
Another participant noted:
"We've started monitoring our monthly spending and cut back on pointless internet purchases. Budgeting is no
longer an option, but a requirement. (IT Professional, P18)
The results indicate that regular spending management has given way to more structured resource allocation in
financial decision-making. Participants demonstrated ongoing planning, execution, and assessment of financial
decisions to maximize scarce household resources, consistent with FRMT. Household net financial savings
declined to 5.2% of GDP in 2022–23, down from 6.7% the previous year (RBI, 2023). At the same time,
household liabilities increased to 5.9% of GDP, indicating growing dependence on borrowing (RBI, 2023). The
observed shift toward budget adjustments and reduced savings aligns with national trends, as household financial
savings declined to 5.2% of GDP while borrowing increased (RBI, 2023).
Theme 3: Financial Well-being Extends Beyond Income
Rather than just having a high salary, participants typically linked financial well-being to the ability to meet
family obligations, maintain savings, and feel confident about future financial commitments.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3529
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
One participant said:
"Financial well-being is not about earning more; it is about feeling confident that you can manage your family's
needs without constant worry." (P15, Teacher at School)
An additional participant disclosed:
"Even though my salary has increased over the years, I don't feel financially stronger because expenses have
increased faster." (P21, Medical Expert)
According to these testimonies, participants assessed their financial well-being primarily based on their
subjective perceptions of financial stability rather than on their actual income. By showing that efficient resource
management—rather than just income—contributes to household financial well-being, this research supports
FRMT. India’s gross domestic savings rate declined to around 29.7%, indicating weakening long-term financial
security (RBI, 2024). Household financial surplus has also declined, reflecting lower financial buffers and
reduced confidence (RBI, 2023).
Declining perceptions of financial security align with macro-level evidence showing a fall in domestic savings
rates and shrinking household financial surplus (RBI, 2023; 2024).
Theme 4: Financial Stress Influences Household Relationships
According to participants, one of the most important effects of rising living expenses is financial stress. Anxiety
and uncertainty were often caused by worries about future savings, housing costs, healthcare bills, and children's
schooling.
One participant clarified:
"Sometimes financial discussions become stressful because we want to save more, but monthly expenses leave
very little." (P9, Official)
Another participant said:
"Unexpected medical expenses create the biggest financial pressure because they disturb the entire monthly
budget." (Private Sector Manager, P5)
The results show that financial stress was associated with uncertainty about future financial responsibilities and
insufficient income. According to FRMT, this stems from an imbalance between household resources and rising
environmental demands. Rising costs of essential services (healthcare, education, and food) have significantly
increased household financial stress (RBI, 2023). Inflation trends indicate persistent pressure on essential
consumption categories, especially food prices (MoSPI, 2026). Increased financial anxiety among participants
reflects broader inflationary pressures, particularly in essential sectors such as food and services, which
disproportionately affect household financial stability (RBI, 2023; MoSPI, 2026).
Theme 5: Adaptive Coping Strategies Enhance Financial Resilience
Participants reported using a variety of coping mechanisms to manage rising living costs. These included cutting
back on discretionary spending, delaying large purchases, strengthening savings discipline, seeking new sources
of income, and improving household budgeting techniques.
A participant observed:
"Instead of spending on luxury items, we now focus on building an emergency fund because financial security
has become more important." (Lecturer, P11)
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3530
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Another person made the following comment:
"I started doing freelance work during weekends to support household expenses and maintain our savings."
(Software Engineer, P23)
These adaptive behaviors show how households changed their financial habits over time to maintain stability
amid economic volatility. These coping mechanisms are adaptive resource management techniques that support
long-term household financial resilience, according to FRMT. Households are increasingly drawing down
savings and increasing borrowing, indicating adaptive coping mechanisms (RBI, 2023). NSSO data show a shift
in expenditure patterns toward non-food essentials, reflecting behavioral adaptation to changing economic
conditions (MoSPI, 2024). The coping strategies identified in this study align with national evidence showing
increased borrowing and shifting consumption patterns as households adapt to economic pressures (RBI, 2023;
MoSPI, 2024).
The findings indicate that increasing living expenses significantly influence household financial behavior by
altering spending habits, elevating financial stress, and encouraging more strategic financial choices. Participants
highlighted that effective management of household resources, financial planning, and adaptable coping
strategies are crucial to financial well-being, alongside income. These results suggest that households constantly
adjust their resource allocation in response to external economic pressures to maintain resilience and stability,
as understood through the Family Resource Management Theory.
DISCUSSION
This study explored how rising living costs impact the financial health and decision-making of working
professionals in Uttarakhand. Based on the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT), it shows that
increasing expenses significantly alter household financial behaviors by raising financial stress, prompting
adaptive coping mechanisms, and leading to more intentional resource distribution. Instead of passively reacting
to economic challenges, households actively modify their financial routines by regularly adjusting their budgets,
spending habits, and savings. These results strongly support FRMT's main idea that families manage limited
resources dynamically in response to changing environmental factors (Deacon & Firebaugh, 1988).
One of the most prominent findings concerns the perceived impact of rising living costs on household spending
patterns. Participants consistently reported higher spending on essentials such as housing, food, healthcare,
transportation, and children's education. This aligns with Consumption Theory, particularly the notion that
households prioritize essential consumption when income constraints tighten (Keynes, 1936; Friedman, 1957).
Recent empirical studies (e.g., Baker et al., 2023; World Bank, 2022) likewise show that inflation
disproportionately affects essential consumption, thereby reducing discretionary spending and savings capacity.
However, this study extends the literature by capturing the lived experiences behind these adjustments, showing
that households actively rebalance competing financial priorities rather than merely experiencing reduced
purchasing power.
The findings further reveal a shift toward more strategic and deliberate financial decision-making. Participants
emphasized budgeting, expenditure tracking, and intra-household financial discussions as essential practices.
This aligns with prior research indicating that financial planning and budgeting are key determinants of financial
well-being (Xiao & Porto, 2020). From a theoretical perspective, this behavior can be interpreted through
Behavioral Finance Theory, particularly mental accounting (Thaler, 1999), in which individuals categorize and
control spending to manage financial constraints. The study shows that financial decision-making is not purely
rational but is shaped by cognitive and social processes within households, reinforcing FRMT’s view of financial
management as an ongoing cycle of planning, implementation, and evaluation.
An important aspect of this study is its multidimensional view of financial well-being. Participants linked
financial well-being not just to income, but also to financial security, confidence, and the capacity to fulfill family
responsibilities. This supports current frameworks that see financial well-being as both a measurable and
personal experience (Netemeyer et al., 2018; CFPB, 2020). Additionally, many participants noted that increasing
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3531
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
income did not always lead to greater well-being, as rising living costs often offset income gains. This indicates
that financial satisfaction is more about balancing income with spending needs rather than the absolute level of
income.
Financial stress has become a key outcome of increasing living costs. Participants voiced worries about future
savings, healthcare costs, children’s education, and emergencies. These results agree with recent research
(OECD, 2021; Lusardi et al., 2023), which points to inflation and economic instability as major sources of
financial anxiety. Notably, the study shows that financial stress often stems from uncertainty about the future
rather than immediate income shortages. This matches Behavioral Finance theories such as loss aversion and
perceived uncertainty (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), where individuals are more sensitive to possible future
losses, intensifying stress even when current income is steady.
The identified adaptive coping strategies—such as cutting discretionary spending, delaying major purchases,
enhancing budgeting, creating emergency funds, and finding additional income—strengthen the explanatory
power of FRMT. These behaviors exemplify the cyclical resource management process highlighted in the theory,
where households continually assess and modify their financial approaches to maintain stability. Furthermore,
these coping methods align with recent studies on household financial resilience (Mian et al., 2022; RBI, 2023),
indicating that proactive financial adjustments are crucial in reducing the negative impacts of inflation.
A significant contribution of this research is its focus on Uttarakhand. Unlike most existing studies that depend
on nationwide or city-specific data, this work shows how regional economic factors, employment patterns, and
family obligations influence financial decision-making. The results indicate that strategies for financial
adaptation vary by context, reinforcing the need for localized economic analysis in household finance studies
(World Bank, 2022). This underscores the importance of considering regional diversity when creating financial
policies and interventions.
The study extends the applicability of the Family Resource Management Theory by integrating it with insights
from Behavioral Finance and Consumption Theory. While FRMT explains the structural process of resource
allocation, Behavioral Finance offers a deeper understanding of psychological responses to financial stress, and
Consumption Theory explains shifts in spending behavior under income constraints. Together, these frameworks
provide a more comprehensive explanation of how households respond to persistent increases in the cost of
living.
This study enriches the growing body of household finance research by providing a detailed qualitative insight
into financial behavior during inflationary periods. It highlights that financial well-being relies not just on
resource availability but also on effective management within fluctuating economic conditions. Therefore, policy
efforts should go beyond boosting income, incorporating financial literacy, budgeting assistance, workplace
wellness programs, and policies aimed at enhancing household resilience. These strategies are vital for helping
households adapt to ongoing economic challenges and increasing living expenses.
Implications
This study enhances understanding of how increasing living costs affect the financial well-being and decisions
of working professionals. Using a qualitative method and drawing on the Family Resource Management Theory
(FRMT), this study highlights the adaptable and dynamic nature of household financial behavior under economic
stress.
Unlike most quantitative research, this study offers detailed, experiential insights into how people perceive and
react to financial difficulties in real-life situations. Additionally, combining views from Behavioral Finance and
Consumption Theory provides a deeper understanding of financial decision-making, especially during inflation
and economic uncertainty. Therefore, the study's results have significant implications for three main areas:
advancing theory, practical use, and shaping public policy.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3532
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Theoretical Implications
By extending the application of the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT) to address the challenge of
rising living costs, this research significantly enhances knowledge in household finance. It demonstrates how
FRMT can explain the connections among rising living costs, household financial decisions, financial well-
being, stress, and coping strategies, whereas previous studies have primarily used it to analyze budgeting,
resource allocation, and expenditure. The findings suggest that the availability and management of financial
resources amid economic shifts influence family financial success. Additionally, the study provides valuable
qualitative insights that complement the predominantly quantitative research in household finance, highlighting
contextual and behavioral factors that affect financial well-being through individuals' experiences. It also
expands the geographical scope of FRMT and offers a deeper understanding of household financial behavior in
emerging economies by presenting context-specific data from Uttarakhand, an understudied region.
Practical Implications
Employers, financial institutions, educators, and professionals can all gain from these insights. The report
highlights the importance of employee financial well-being for enhancing workplace performance, job
satisfaction, and productivity. To support employees facing financial challenges, organizations might implement
financial wellness programs such as debt management, retirement planning, budgeting workshops, and financial
counseling. Financial institutions can use this data to develop customer-centric financial products and advisory
services tailored to the evolving needs of salaried households. Digital budgeting tools, emergency financial aid,
and flexible savings options can help individuals become more resilient and proficient at managing their
finances.
The report also stresses the vital role of financial education in enhancing household financial skills. Educational
institutions and community groups can promote practical financial literacy programs that focus on long-term
planning, managing debt, budgeting, and saving. The findings underscore the importance of proactive financial
planning, disciplined budgeting, emergency savings, and regular review of household financial goals as essential
strategies for maintaining financial stability, especially during uncertain economic periods for working
professionals.
Policy Implications
For legislators aiming to bolster household financial resilience, this report offers essential insights. Governments
should promote financial inclusion alongside literacy initiatives by emphasizing practical money management
skills. Policies that reduce housing, transportation, healthcare, and education costs could further improve the
financial health of middle-class working families. Moreover, establishing comprehensive financial wellness
programs that encourage sustainable household money management can be achieved through greater
collaboration among government agencies, businesses, academic institutions, and financial service providers.
Such partnerships can enhance long-term financial security, reduce stress, and build resilience among working
professionals. Overall, the study delivers valuable theoretical, practical, and policy insights that advance
household finance research and support evidence-based strategies to improve financial well-being and
sustainable household decision-making amid increasing living costs.
Limitations and Future Research
This study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings, as with any empirical
research. Initially, 25 working professionals from Uttarakhand took part in semi-structured interviews as part of
the qualitative approach. These findings are not meant for statistical generalization to the broader population but
offer rich, context-specific insights into participants' lived experiences. They provide a detailed understanding
of household financial behavior within Uttarakhand's unique socioeconomic environment.
Furthermore, the research focuses solely on employees in the public and private sectors with regular wages.
Consequently, it does not capture the experiences of self-employed individuals, business owners, daily-wage
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3533
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
workers, agricultural laborers, or households without formal employment. These groups may face different
challenges related to the cost of living due to variations in financial resources, job stability, and income security.
Third, the study looks at household financial decisions and well-being at a single point in time. Since household
financial behavior is dynamic and can change due to shifting circumstances, policy updates, or economic shifts,
a longitudinal study could provide deeper insights into how these behaviors evolve over time. Future research
could expand on this work in several ways. Larger and more diverse samples in quantitative studies could help
confirm and extend the findings across India. Comparative research examining households in different states,
occupational groups, or urban versus rural areas could shed light on regional differences in financial behavior.
Additionally, integrating other theoretical frameworks—like the Theory of Planned Behavior, Financial
Capability Theory, or Behavioral Finance Theory—could enhance understanding of household decision-making.
Lastly, employing mixed methods to explore how rising living costs influence household resource management,
financial resilience, and overall well-being could offer a more comprehensive picture.
CONCLUSION
Rising living costs have become a global concern, impacting household financial security and well-being. This
study explores how increasing expenses influence decision-making among working professionals in
Uttarakhand. Using a qualitative approach guided by the Family Resource Management Theory (FRMT), this
study examines the links among rising costs, financial well-being, stress, coping strategies, and household
management. Findings indicate that higher living expenses lead to more careful resource allocation, budgeting,
and prioritization of spending. Participants highlighted that financial security and confidence, along with the
ability to manage household responsibilities, are closely tied to overall financial well-being, which extends
beyond just having a sufficient income. The study also finds that households continually adapt to economic
changes by employing strategies such as restructuring spending, strict budgeting, saving improvements, and
generating additional income. These adaptive behaviors reflect the dynamic resource management process
described in the Family Resource Management Theory.
By applying FRMT to address the rising living costs and incorporating qualitative data from Uttarakhand's
understudied regional context, this study enriches the existing literature. It offers a deeper understanding of the
lived experiences and financial decision-making of working professionals facing ongoing economic challenges,
in contrast to previous research that primarily used quantitative methods. Practically, the findings emphasize the
importance of stronger financial literacy initiatives, workplace financial wellness programs, and supportive
public policies to bolster household financial resilience. Organizations and policymakers can better support
working professionals in tackling persistent economic difficulties by promoting effective financial planning and
resource management.
Overall, the study indicates that a household's ability to effectively manage resources, adapt to changing
economic situations, and make sound financial decisions is more crucial for financial well-being than income
alone. It concludes that sustaining financial health despite rising living costs depends on efficient resource
management. By applying the Family Resource Management Theory to the Indian context, this research lays the
groundwork for future studies on household financial resilience and provides practical insights to enhance
financial well-being amid growing economic uncertainty.
REFERENCES
Books
1. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press.
2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
3. Deacon, R. E., & Firebaugh, F. M. (1988). Family resource management: Principles and applications (2nd
ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
4. Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3534
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
5. Goldsmith, E. B. (2012). Resource management for individuals and families (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
6. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.).
Cengage.
7. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.
8. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th
ed.). Jossey-Bass.
9. Mishkin, F. S. (2019). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets (12th ed.). Pearson.
10. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
11. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.).
Pearson.
12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage
Publications.
13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
14. Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
B. Journal Articles / Research Papers
15. Brüggen, E. C., Hogreve, J., Holmlund, M., Kabadayi, S., & Löfgren, M. (2017). Financial well-being: A
conceptualization and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 79, 228–237.
16. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.
17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data
saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
18. Hernandez-Perez, J., & Cruz Rambaud, S. (2025). Uncovering the factors of financial well-being: The
role of self-control, self-efficacy, and financial hardship. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 70.
19. Joo, S., & Grable, J. E. (2004). An exploratory framework of financial satisfaction. Journal of Family and
Economic Issues, 25(1), 25–50.
20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica,
47(2), 263–291.
21. Mian, A., Straub, L., & Sufi, A. (2021). The saving glut of the rich. Journal of Political Economy, 129(12),
3673–3723.
22. Netemeyer, R. G., Warmath, D., Fernandes, D., & Lynch, J. G. (2018). How am I doing? Perceived
financial well-being. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 68–89.
23. Parrotta, J. L., & Johnson, P. J. (1998). The impact of financial attitudes and knowledge on financial
management and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 59–75.
24. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183–
206.
25. Tiwari, P., & Joshi, B. (2022). Regional disparities and household economic behavior in Himalayan states.
Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 7(2), 210–228.
26. Ruel, M. T., Garrett, J. L., Hawkes, C., & Cohen, M. J. (2010). The food, fuel, and financial crises
disproportionately affect the urban and rural poor: A review of the evidence. The Journal of Nutrition,
140(1), 170S–176S.
Reports (APA 7th Edition)
27. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2015). Financial well-being report.
28. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2017). Financial well-being in America.
29. Government of Uttarakhand. (2022). Economic survey of Uttarakhand.
30. International Labour Organization. (2023). Global wage report 2022–23.
31. International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook: Inflation and cost-of-living crisis.
32. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2024). Household consumption expenditure
survey (HCES) 2023–24. Government of India.
www.rsisinternational.org
Page 3535
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
33. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2026). Consumer price index (CPI) inflation
data. Government of India.
34. National Council of Applied Economic Research. (2021). Household income and expenditure survey.
35. National Statistical Office. (2022). Household consumption expenditure survey.
36. NITI Aayog. (2018). Strategy for New India @75.
37. NITI Aayog. (2021). SDG India index & dashboard.
38. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). OECD/INFE 2020 international
survey of adult financial literacy.
39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Rising cost of living and financial
resilience.
40. Planning Commission of India. (2013). Report on hill area development.
41. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2021). Employee financial wellness survey.
42. Reserve Bank of India. (2021). Report on household finance.
43. Reserve Bank of India. (2023). Annual report.
44. Reserve Bank of India. (2023). Report on currency and finance.
45. Reserve Bank of India. (2023). Household financial savings and liabilities in India. RBI Bulletin.
46. Reserve Bank of India. (2024). Annual report 2023–24.
47. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Financial inclusion and credit delivery developments.
48. World Bank. (2021). The Global Findex database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and
resilience in the age of COVID-19.
49. World Bank. (2022). Global economic prospects.
50. World Bank. (2022). Financial inclusion overview.