Balancing Automation with Human Expertise in Exploratory Testing and Edge-Case Analysis
Authors
Nusrat Yasmin Nadia
Master of Science in Information Technology, Washington University of Science & Technology (WUST), Alexandria, Virginia, USA (US)
Mohammed Majid Bakhsh
Master of Science in Information Technology, Washington University of Science & Technology (WUST), Alexandria, Virginia, USA (US)
Gazi Touhidul Alam
Master of Science in Business Analytics, Trine University, Allen Park, MI, USA (US)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.14020031
Subject Category: Software Quality Assurance
Volume/Issue: 14/2 | Page No: 302-313
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-03-22
Published: 2025-03-22
Abstract
Abstract: Software systems requiring complex testing benefit greatly from both exploratory testing and edge-case analysis because these methods reveal defects that automated testing would miss. The growing use of automation to quicken testing operations requires organizations to achieve proper equilibrium between automated tools and skilled human labor. This document examines how machine testing benefits from human involvement to perform exploratory testing and identify any hidden edge-case situations. The advantage of automation tools lies in their ability to deliver both speed and uniformity but they struggle to replicate essential human capabilities which help recognize hidden issues in unusual circumstances (Baresi et al., 2022). Human testers have a strong ability to detect stealthy defects yet their testing capabilities face challenges in achieving complete scalability and coverage (Smith & Zhang, 2021).
This paper evaluates the difficulties and advantages of uniting automated testing solutions with people-driven exploratory testing during edge-case scenario analysis. The combination of automated testing and human tester intervention represents the best approach according to current industry practices since automation performs repetitive tasks and human testers handle critical thinking tasks and pattern recognition with defect discovery responsibilities (Carver et al., 2023). Our research develops a framework to merge automated and manual testing methods and it examines AI exploratory testing solutions and human-assisted automated testing environments for future development. Organizations need to completely evaluate their testing methods so they can combine automated functions with human cognition properly for enhanced testing methodology (Jain & Singh, 2020).
Keywords
Exploratory Testing, Automation, Human Expertise, Hybrid Testing, Software Testing, Test Automation Tools, AI-driven Testing, Human-in-the-Loop, Defect Detection
Downloads
References
1. Bertolino, A., Gnesi, S., & Polini, A. (2023). Explainable AI in Software Testing: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development, 11(2), 105-123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Carver, J., Hassan, A., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Implementing Human-in-the-Loop AI Testing Frameworks. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 49(1), 45-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Johnson, M., & Lee, T. (2023). Large Language Models in Automated Test Generation: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3), 12-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Lopez, R., & Carter, K. (2023). Self-Healing Test Automation in Continuous Integration Pipelines. Software Quality Journal, 31(4), 211-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Martinez, P., & Singh, D. (2023). AI-Powered Test Oracles for Edge-Case Validation. International Journal of Software Testing and Verification, 20(2), 89-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Nguyen, H., Patel, R., & Williams, S. (2023). Adaptive Exploratory Testing with Machine Learning. Software Testing, Verification & Reliability, 33(1), 56-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Rodriguez, L., & Hayes, J. (2023). The Role of AI in Defect Prediction and Risk-Based Testing. Empirical Software Engineering, 28(3), 129-154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Taylor, B., & Green, C. (2023). Upskilling QA Engineers for AI-Augmented Testing: Strategies and Challenges. Journal of Software Testing & Quality Assurance, 14(2), 178-196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Turner, E., & Carter, D. (2023). Ethical Considerations in AI-Assisted Software Testing. AI & Society, 38(1), 55-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Leveraging Pension Assets for Investment in Nigeria's Marginal Oil Fields: A Conceptual Analysis
- The Influence of Green Technology, Environmental Disclosure and Green Intellectual Capital on Stock Returns
- Performance Evaluation of Some Machine Learning Models for Music Genre Classification
- The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on University Information Literacy Education: A Systematic Review from Challenges to Changes
- Development of a Manychat Based Chatbot for Automated Customer Support System