The Impact Of AI-Driven Recruitment Tools on Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion (DEI) Outcomes in Hiring Practices
Authors
Dr. C. Sharmila Rao
Associate Professor, CMS, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru (IN)
Dr. Jayati Gupta
Associate Professor, CMS, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru (IN)
Dr, Rakhi M. R
Associate Professor, CMS, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140400120
Subject Category: Human Resources Management
Volume/Issue: 14/4 | Page No: 1001-1004
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-05-23
Published: 2025-05-23
Abstract
Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment has transformed traditional hiring practices, offering efficiency, scalability, and data-driven decision-making. However, the implications of AI on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) remain complex and multifaceted. This paper investigates how AI-driven recruitment tools affect DEI outcomes, examining both the potential benefits and inherent risks. Through an analysis of current literature and emerging trends, this research identifies the key challenges and opportunities for aligning AI recruitment technologies with DEI goals. Recommendations for ethical implementation and the role of human oversight are also explored.
Keywords
AI recruitment, diversity, equity, inclusion, DEI, algorithmic bias, ethical hiring, human resources technology
Downloads
References
1. Accenture. (2020). Inclusion and diversity in the age of AI. https://www.accenture.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Amazing workplaces (2024). Top 7 Companies in India Leading the Way in DEI: Initiatives and Impact. https://amazingworkplaces.co/top-7-companies-in-india-leading-the-way-in-dei-initiatives-and-impact/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Binns, R. (2020). On the apparent conflict between individual and group fairness. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). 'It's reducing a human being to a percentage': Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms, equity, and bias. Upturn. https://www.upturn.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scrapped 'sexist AI' recruiting tool. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/insight-amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK0AG/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Liem, C. C. S., Langer, M., Demetriou, A., Kumar, K., & Shankar, S. (2018). Psychology meets machine learning: Interdisciplinary perspectives on algorithmic job candidate screening. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0352-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Raji, I. D., & Buolamwini, J. (2019). Actionable auditing: Investigating the impact of publicly naming biased performance results of commercial AI products. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 429-435. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Roberson, Q. M. (2019). Diversity in the workplace: A review, synthesis, and future research agenda. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 69-88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Upadhyay, A. K., & Khandelwal, K. (2018). Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitment. Strategic HR Review, 17(5), , 255-258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Whittaker, M., Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Fried, G., Kaziunas, E., Mathur, V., ... & Schwartz, O. (2018). AI Now Report 2018. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2018_Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Zliobaite, I. (2017). Measuring discrimination in algorithmic decision making. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31, 1060–1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-017-0506-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Exploring the Concept of Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review
- Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Critiquing-Based Mobile-Web Employment Recommender System
- Integrating Bhagavad Gita Principles with Modern Supply Chain Management: A Framework for Ethical and Resilient Operations
- Soilless Indoor Farming: A Systematic Review of Iot-Based Monitoring Systems and Physiochemical Characterization Methods for Lactuca Sativa
- Financial Awareness: A Survey of Students in Bhopal