Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: Molecular Mechanisms and Biotechnological Advances
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract: Abiotic stress factors—including drought, salinity, extreme temperatures, and heavy metal exposure—pose serious threats to global agricultural productivity and food security. In response, plants have developed complex physiological and molecular systems to detect and counteract these environmental challenges. Key components include dynamic signaling pathways, efficient reactive oxygen species (ROS) detoxification mechanisms, regulation of gene expression by specialized transcription factors, and accumulation of osmoprotectants to maintain cellular balance. Breakthroughs in omics-based technologies and precise gene-editing platforms such as CRISPR/Cas have accelerated the identification and functional analysis of genes linked to stress resistance. Moreover, emerging insights into epigenetic modulation and stress memory suggest additional layers of adaptive regulation. This review consolidates recent findings on the molecular frameworks of abiotic stress resilience in plants and evaluates current biotechnological strategies to enhance crop tolerance. We also highlight future directions that integrate synthetic biology, nanotechnology, and systems-level approaches to address agricultural challenges under climate variability.
Downloads
References
Backer, R., Rokem, J. S., Ilangumaran, G., Lamont, J., Praslickova, D., Ricci, E. & Smith, D. L. (2018). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473
Bortesi, L., & Fischer, R. (2015). The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnology Advances, 33(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006
Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., & Gao, C. (2019). CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 70, 667–697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049
Chinnusamy, V., Zhu, J., & Zhu, J.-K. (2004). Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(395), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh016
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Totir, L. R., Baumgarten, A., & Graham, G. (2014). Predicting the future of plant breeding: Complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14007
Dempewolf, H., Baute, G., Anderson, J., Kilian, B., Smith, C., & Guarino, L. (2017). Past and future use of wild relatives in crop breeding. Crop Science, 57(3), 1070–1082. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0885
Fahlgren, N., Gehan, M. A., & Baxter, I. (2015). Lights, camera, action: High-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 24, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.02.006
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
Ghosal, S., Das, S., Bandyopadhyay, T., & Gangopadhyay, K. K. (2018). Artificial intelligence and machine learning based data-driven predictive models for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A review. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(19), 4841–4851. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery209
Huang, X., & Han, B. (2014). Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035715
IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2018). Plant abiotic stress proteomics: The major factors determining alterations in cellular proteome. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00122
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., & Prášil, I. T. (2011). Protein contribution to plant drought tolerance. Journal of Proteomics, 74(8), 1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.020
Kumar, R., et al. (2016). Synthetic stress-inducible promoters: A promising approach for plant biotechnology. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 34(2), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-015-0924-3
Liu, W., & Stewart, C. N. Jr. (2015). Plant synthetic biology. Trends in Plant Science, 20(5), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.005
Liu, Q., Kasuga, M., Sakuma, Y., Abe, H., Miura, S., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2013). Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 10(8), 1391–1406. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391
Mittler, R. (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science, 11(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
Nakashima, K., Tran, L. S. P., Van Nguyen, D., Fujita, M., Maruyama, K., Todaka, D., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. (2014). Functional analysis of a NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC6 involved in abiotic and biotic stress-responsive gene expression in rice. Plant Journal, 51(4), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03168.x
Schmidt, R., Schippers, J. H., Mieulet, D., Obata, T., Fernie, A. R., Guiderdoni, E., & Mueller-Roeber, B. (2020). Deeper insights into plant stress tolerance through integrated omics and genome editing approaches. Plant Cell Reports, 39(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02507-3
Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Luan, S. (2017). ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12603
Tester, M., & Langridge, P. (2010). Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science, 327(5967), 818–822. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700
Varshney, R. K., Bohra, A., Yu, J., Graner, A., Zhang, Q., & Sorrells, M. E. (2021). Designing future crops: Genomics-assisted breeding comes of age. Trends in Plant Science, 26(6), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.007
Weckwerth, W. (2011). Green systems biology—from single genomes, proteomes and metabolomes to ecosystems research and biotechnology. Journal of Proteomics, 75(1), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.07.010
Zhou, H., He, X., Huang, X., Hao, X., & Wang, Z. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of OsRR22 improves rice salinity tolerance. Plant Cell Reports, 36(3), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2079-8
Zhu, J.-K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.