00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in the Context of NBFC Customers

Authors

Vaivaw Kumar Singh

Research Scholar, Faculty of Business Management, Sarala Birla University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India (IN)

Kunal Sinha

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Commerce, Sarala Birla University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1407000102

Subject Category: Business Management

Volume/Issue: 14/7 | Page No: 846-855

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-08-13

Published: 2025-08-13

Abstract

Abstract: This study investigates how the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its extensions can explain and predict the adoption of digital services offered by Non‑Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) in India. Central to TAM are two key user perceptions: Perceived Usefulness (PU)—the belief that a technology enhances performance or convenience—and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)—the belief that using the system is effort‑free. These constructs drive Behavioral Intention (BI), which precedes actual use.


To contextualize TAM within the NBFC sector—which primarily serves underserved and financially vulnerable populations—this research incorporates additional factors such as Trust, Perceived Risk, Subjective Norms, and Facilitating Conditions. Trust captures users’ beliefs in institutional reliability and data protection; Perceived Risk reflects fears of privacy breaches or hidden charges; Subjective Norms cover the influence of family or social circles; and Facilitating Conditions include factors such as smartphone access, digital literacy, and support systems.


Based on these constructs, we formulate a conceptual framework in which PU, PEOU, Trust, Risk, and Social Influence affect BI, and BI in turn predicts actual usage behavior. Facilitating Conditions are postulated to moderate the translation from intention to action.


Empirically, the framework is validated using a structured survey administered to a representative sample of 400–500 NBFC customers across urban and rural India. Measures are adapted from validated TAM studies and extended-fintech acceptance research. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is leveraged to test measurement reliability and the hypothesized relationships.


Findings are expected to show that PU and Trust are strong positive predictors of BI, PEOU influences PU and intention, and that Perceived Risk exerts a negative effect. Subjective Norms and Facilitating Conditions are also anticipated to play significant roles. The research explores how demographic moderators—such as age, education, and digital literacy—shape these relationships.


This study contributes to theory by adapting extended TAM to the unique context of NBFC customers in India, offering a nuanced understanding of digital financial adoption. Practically, it offers actionable insights for NBFCs and regulators seeking to enhance adoption and financial inclusion—emphasizing user‑friendly design, transparent policies, trust‑building mechanisms, and supportive digital ecosystems.

Keywords

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Usefulness (PU), NBFC Digital Adoption, NBFC customers’ technology acceptance, Behavioral Intention (BI)

Downloads

References

1. Anand, S. (2025, June 24). RBI’s 2025 Digital Lending Directions: A new framework for trust and transparency. The Contemporary Law Forum. Legal 500+2IndiaCorpLaw+2bajajtechnologyservices.com+2IndiaCorpLaw+6tclf.in+6SCC Online+6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Apaua, R., & Lallie, H. S. (2022). Measuring user-perceived security of mobile banking applications. arXiv. arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Business Standard. (2025, May 9). RBI issues Reserve Bank of India (Digital Lending) Directions, 2025. Business Standard. Argus Partners+5Business Standard+5Legal 500+5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Debnath, P. (2025, May 12). RBI’s digital lending reset: What changes in fintech lending? Outlook Money. IndiaCorpLaw+9Outlook Money+9Outlook Money+9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Economic Times. (2025, July 24). From collateral to clicks: RBI Bulletin maps India’s digital credit revolution. The Economic Times. economictimes.indiatimes.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Economic Times. (2025, May 27). RBI tightens default loss guarantee rule; NBFCs to exclude cover on fintech sourced loans. The Economic Times. Legal 500+2tclf.in+2economictimes.indiatimes.com+2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Economic Times. (2025, May 29). RBI to review digital banking regulations, expand lending interface and CBDC pilots. The Economic Times. economictimes.indiatimes.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fortune India. (2025, May 11). Digital lending gets a regulatory overhaul: RBI mandates app directory, loan transparency. Fortune India. Fortune India [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Legal500. (2025). Reserve Bank of India (Digital Lending) Directions, 2025: Brief overview & analysis. Legal500. Fortune India+5Legal 500+5Business Standard+5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. LeeGality. (2025, May 16). Loan agreements under RBI’s 2025 Digital Lending Directions–explainer. LeeGality. leegality.com+1IndiaCorpLaw+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. RBI Digital Lending Directions 2025 – An Overview. (2025). Argus Knowledge Centre. Argus Partners+1leegality.com+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Reuters. (2025, February 25). India’s RBI partly dials back strict loan rules for micro credit, non bank lenders. Reuters. reuters.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Reuters. (2024, December 19). Indian government proposes prison terms, fines for illegal lending. Reuters. reuters.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ramesh, D., Kameswaran, V., Wang, D., & Sambasivan, N. (2022). How platform user power relations shape algorithmic accountability: A case study of instant loan platforms and financially stressed users in India. arXiv. arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Saputra, D., & Gürbüz, B. (2021). Implementation of TAM and importance performance analysis in testing the ease and usability of e wallet applications. arXiv. arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Singh, S., Singh, D. K., Singh, M. K., & Singh, S. (2010). Forecasting the 3G market in India based on revised Technology Acceptance Model. arXiv. arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology–toward a unified view (UTAUT). MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2de.wikipedia.org+2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Wikipedia. (2025, July). Financial technology in India. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wikipedia. (2025, July). Technology acceptance model. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wikipedia. (2025, July). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Wikipedia. de.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wikipedia. (2025, June). Unified Lending Interface. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wikipedia. (2025, June). Digital rupee. Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Economic Times. (2025). From collateral to clicks: digital credit revolution in India. Economic Times Bulletin. economictimes.indiatimes.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. SCP Online. (2025, May 14). RBI shapes the future of digital lending, 2025. SCC Times. SCC Online [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. TVS Capital Funds. (2024). NBFCs fintech landscape & RBI’s lens. TVS Capital Funds Insights. reuters.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Grant Thornton India. (2024). The evolution of digital lending in India. Grant Thornton Thought Leadership. reuters.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Economic Times. (2024). Disrupting credit: Smart underwriting in retail lending. Economic Times Finance. en.wikipedia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Bank of Baroda. (2025). New guidelines on digital lending issued by RBI. Bank of Baroda Banking Mantra. bankofbaroda.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schneider, Example. (2025). RBI resets digital lending architecture: Implications for NBFCs & fintech. Outlook Money. bajajtechnologyservices.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Japan Statistical Bureau. (2025). Impacts of digital lending regulations on fintech adoption in India. Capital Markets India. Business Standard [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.