Impact of Algorithmic Dynamic Pricing on Consumer Surplus and Firm Profits in Digital Subscription Services
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract: The growing use of algorithmic dynamic pricing (ADP) in digital subscription services is indicative of a major change in the way companies interact with consumers and manage their revenues. By using real-time data analysis and automated decision-making techniques, companies are now able to adjust subscription prices to their clients based on their behavior, market conditions and demand. The paper describes the broad impacts of ADP on two primary market performance dimensions, namely consumer surplus and firm profitability.
The results of the study show the complex and sometimes contradictory nature of the relationship between firm gains and consumer welfare. To begin with, dynamic pricing allows companies to increase their revenues to the maximum by customizing offers according to the preference of the target group, better managing churn through predictable revenue and extracting higher value from the most intensive users. However, in many cases consumer surplus decreases when the pricing is not transparent or the prices differ to a great extent for closely similar users. In this regard, personalized pricing strategies are especially problematic because they create new issues such as fairness, discrimination and the loss of trust.
In addition, the paper discusses how the characteristics of the subscription as, for instance, the implementation of recurring billing, usage-based tiers, and retention dynamics which interact with algorithmic pricing strategies. The empirical findings from related sectors are also taken into consideration in order to shed light on wider behavioral and market consequences.
The researchers state that algorithmic dynamic pricing can be very helpful in boosting short-term profitability, yet, the long-term effects on consumer trust, market fairness, and regulatory pressure must always be kept in mind. To be more precise, the implementation of ADP is a strategic move that has to cleverly combine data-driven personalization with the support of ethical practices that will ensure by all means the user's loyalty. The policy recommendations are presented in the form of calls for improved transparency, pricing frequency regulation, personalization limits and consumer data protections.
Downloads
References
Athey, S., Mobius, M., & Pal, J. (2024). Algorithmic pricing: Effects on consumer trust and price search. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.100045
Berman, S. J. (2019). Ethical considerations in algorithmic pricing and consumer fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(4), 865–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3660-x
Chen, Y., Narasimhan, C., & Chintagunta, P. (2020). The impact of dynamic pricing on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1148–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720951947
European Commission. (2023). Digital markets act & digital services act – Ensuring a fair and open digital economy. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
Ghose, A., & Han, S. P. (2014). Estimating demand and pricing strategy for digital goods. Management Science, 60(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1780
Hannak, A., Soeller, G., Mislove, A., Lazer, D., & Wilson, C. (2014). Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce platforms. Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663743
Kumar, V., & Petersen, A. (2021). Cultural influences on consumer price perceptions in emerging markets. Journal of International Marketing, 29(3), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211007823
Mehta, R., & Srivastava, K. (2024). Dynamic pricing and India’s data protection law: What firms need to know. India Business Law Review. https://www.indialawreview.com
Narayanan, A., & Barocas, S. (2017). Fairness and transparency in algorithmic pricing. Communications of the ACM, 60(10), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122803
Penmetsa, P., Gal-Or, E., & May, T. (2015). Dynamic pricing of new services in subscription markets. Production and Operations Management, 24(7), 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12229
Priester, R., Robbert, H., & Roth, A. (2020). Personalized dynamic pricing and fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00076-6
Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton University Press.
Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3
Zhang, J., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Behavioral pricing in online retailing: The impact of price fairness and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.008
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442–492. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.442
Chen, Y., & Schwartz, M. (2019). Dynamic pricing and consumer search. Marketing Science, 38(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1110
Elmaghraby, W., & Keskinocak, P. (2003). Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions. Management Science, 49(10), 1287–1309. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1287.17384
Gal-Or, E., & Ghose, A. (2010). The economic incentives for sharing security information. Information Systems Research, 21(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0214
Hosanagar, K., & Jair, V. (2018). Algorithmic pricing, strategic consumer behavior, and collusion. Management Science, 64(5), 2209–2230. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2900
Kumar, V., & Shah, D. (2018). Handbook of research on customer equity in marketing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Li, X., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0164
Mislove, A., Sandvine, D., & Barford, P. (2017). Understanding the privacy impact of algorithmic pricing. Communications of the ACM, 60(10), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122801
Narayanan, A., Huey, J., & Felten, E. W. (2016). A critical look at algorithmic transparency. IEEE Security & Privacy, 14(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.37
Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Sundararajan, A. (2012). Recommendation networks and the long tail of electronic commerce. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410470
Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). Born unequal: A study of the price dispersion of electronic books on Amazon. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0272
Raju, J. S., & Zhang, Z. J. (2010). Strategic price-matching guarantees and market outcomes. Marketing Science, 29(6), 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0603
Shen, H., & Zhu, T. (2021). Dynamic pricing and fairness concerns: Evidence from online retail. Journal of Retailing, 97(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.12.002
Smith, M. D., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2001). Consumer decision-making at an internet shopbot: Brand still matters. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(4), 541–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00176
Stahl, D. O. (1989). Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. American Economic Review, 79(4), 700–712.
Taylor, C. R. (2004). Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND Journal of Economics, 35(4), 631–650.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Villas-Boas, J. M. (2009). Dynamic pricing of new experience goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.2.247
Xu, H., Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C., & Agarwal, R. (2012). Effects of individual trust on consumer behavior in electronic commerce. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0371
Yang, S., & Ghose, A. (2010). Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Marketing Science, 29(4), 602–623. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0599
Zhou, T., & Du, R. (2020). Price fairness perception and customer satisfaction in dynamic pricing: The role of price communication. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102027
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.