Influence of Motivation and Learning Action Cell Practices on Instructional Delivery Effectiveness among Secondary School Teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract: This research explored how secondary school teachers' motivation, involvement in Learning Action Cell activities, and instructional effectiveness are related. Using a quantitative, descriptive-correlational approach, the study surveyed Valencia National High School-licensed teachers in the 2025–2026 academic year. Extrinsic, social, and professional development, and intrinsic motivation were consistently high, with intrinsic motivation cited as the most important component of successful training. Teachers regularly participated in Learning Action Cell activities, including professional development, group planning, and monitoring, which enhanced instruction delivery, as evidenced by student engagement, feedback, topic mastery, and evidence-based practices. Regression analysis demonstrated that social motivation, reflective practice, professional development, and intrinsic motivation were all significant predictors of teaching effectiveness, and that there were significant positive relationships between motivation, collaborative practice, and instructional delivery. The results emphasised the importance of promoting professional cooperation and personal fulfilment to improve teaching effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Abulencia, E., & Resurreccion, J. (2018). Barriers to effective instruction: Teacher perspectives in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 22–36.
Almonicar, C. (2022). School learning action cell (SLAC) program: The Batuan experience [Master’s thesis, Unitec Institute of Technology]. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=20928
Banayo, M. L. (2018). Teacher collaboration in rural schools: Constraints and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 39(1), 85–97.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Christensen, A. A. (2025). Professional learning communities and teacher outcomes using TALIS 2018 data. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58(2), 112–120.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The learning action cell as a K to 12 basic education program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning.
Department of Education. (2025). Department of Education Memo No. 430, s. 2025: Conduct of Learning Action Cell (LAC)/Collaborative Expertise (CE) Sessions. https://www.deped.gov.ph
Garcia, M., Lopez, R., & Dela Cruz, A. (2021). Teacher motivation challenges in Philippine public schools: A mixed-methods analysis. Philippine Educational Review, 45(2), 78–95.
Howard, J. L., et al. (2021). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, 103584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103584
Jansen, S., et al. (2025). Collaborative learning communities in European secondary education. European Journal of Education Research, 89(2), 144–159.
Johnson, K., & Williams, D. (2018). Extrinsic motivation patterns in developing country education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 62, 34-42.
Navarro, A. S., & Barrera, J. Q. (2019). Institutional barriers in learning action cell implementation: A critical perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Research in Education, 14(2), 1–20.
Olmo-Extremera, M., et al. (2022). Professional learning communities in secondary schools and improvement of learning. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1598133
Quezon IV District Study. (2025). Implementation and outcomes of LAC programs in Philippine public schools. Department of Education, Research Division.
Reyes, P., & Cruz, L. (2020). Urban-rural disparities in teacher motivation: Evidence from Philippine secondary schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(3), 187–201.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Satur, C. D., Labadan, C. B., Elbanbuena, C. O., & Comon, J. D. (2024). Exploring the predictors of successful learning action cell implementation among elementary teachers in Davao City. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(10), 352–361.
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2020). Understanding motivation among teachers in the Philippines. https://www.seameo-innotech.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Teacher-Motivation-Research-Report_October2020.pdf
Slemp, G. R., et al. (2020). Autonomy support in the classroom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of teacher motivational behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09521-1
Torres, J., & Santos, M. (2019). Motivational barriers in Philippine teacher workforce: A qualitative investigation. Southeast Asian Studies Quarterly, 38(4), 112–128.
Vasconcellos, D., et al. (2020). The impact of autonomy support on student motivation and engagement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09512-7
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
WingInstitute.org. (2024). Instructional delivery. https://www.winginstitute.org/effective-instruction-delivery
Wullschleger, A. (2025). Teacher collaboration: Conceptualization and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 21–33.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.