Evaluating Point Cloud Measurement Accuracy for Residential Property Valuation: A Case Study Using LiDAR Scanning
Authors
Siti Zaleha Daud
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (MY)
Rabi’atul’Adawiyah Azmil
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (MY)
Suzanna Noor Azmy
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (MY)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000080
Subject Category: Geomatics Engineering
Volume/Issue: 14/10 | Page No: 637-643
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-12
Published: 2025-11-11
Abstract
Abstract—The most important part of property valuation is accurate property measurement. The more accurate measurement of all types of property, including residential buildings, could lead to an equal and fair value for the property. By comparing linear wall-to-wall measurements taken from point clouds with those taken from certified floor plans, this study evaluates the potential of three-dimensional (3D) point cloud data for use in property measurement. Dimensional measurements were obtained by processing 3D data of a residence in Kajang, Malaysia, using LiDAR-based scanning via PolyCam Pro on an iPhone 14 Pro Max. To assess the workflow’s generalizability, a sample dataset provided by PolyCam representing a landed residential unit was also tested using the same measurement procedure. The results indicate that consumer-grade point cloud data can achieve accuracy sufficient for expert valuation support, with deviations of approximately ±10 mm in the primary dataset and ±3.5 mm in the validation dataset. This shows how point cloud technology can improve transparency, reduce measurement errors caused by individuals, and help in the digital transformation of valuation workflows
Keywords
Point cloud, Measurement accuracy, Residential property valuation, LiDAR scanning, Floor plan comparison
Downloads
References
1. N. French and L. Gabrielli, Property Valuation: The Five Methods, Routledge, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. N. Kaluthanthri and A. Hippola, “Uncertainty in valuation practice: Causes and implications,” Property Management, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. M. Mallinson and N. French, “Uncertainty in property valuation,” Journal of Property Investment & Finance, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Y. Yi, L. Chen, and X. Zhao, “LiDAR applications in urban mapping,” Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 942, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. H. Zhao, Q. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Advances in LiDAR-based building modeling,” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. V-2-2020, pp. 351–360, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. H. Yamani, M. Azizan, and S. Noor, “Challenges in integrating 3D data in valuation workflows,” Journal of Valuation Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 15–28, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. R. Boeters, H. Li, and S. Zlatanova, “3D models and valuation accuracy: An LOD2 approach,” ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. II-3/W4, pp. 31–38, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. A. Ganz, N. Haala, and G. Mandlburger, “Accuracy analysis of handheld LiDAR devices for indoor mapping,” ISPRS Archives, vol. XLII-2/W13, pp. 633–640, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. M. Arif, S. Rahman, and H. Zulkifli, “Application of consumer-grade LiDAR for built environment measurement,” Journal of Spatial Technologies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 44–52, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. L. Cai, Y. Wang, and X. Zhou, “Satellite-based LiDAR for urban building measurement: Accuracy and limitations,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 212, pp. 112–124, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. M. Borz, D. Rusu, and R. Muresan, “Evaluation of mobile LiDAR accuracy in built environment applications,” Remote Sensing Applications, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 101112, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Board of Valuers, Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Managers (BOVAEP), Malaysian Valuation Standards (8th Edition), Putrajaya: Ministry of Finance Malaysia, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. B. Mete and T. Yomralioglu, “Integration of BIM and GIS for 3D property valuation,” Land Use Policy, vol. 82, pp. 524–532, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. B. Mete, I. Turan, and T. Yomralioglu, “GIS-BIM integration for automated valuation models,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 96, p. 101222, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. B. Atazadeh, A. Rajabifard, M. Kalantari, and K. Champion, “Extending a BIM-based data model to support 3D digital management of complex ownership spaces,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1440–1463, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. M. Renigier-Biłozor, S. Źróbek, and R. Źróbek, “Integration of uncertainty in automated property valuation,” Land Use Policy, vol. 82, pp. 723–735, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Y. Su, J. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “Automated real estate valuation using BIM and machine learning,” Automation in Construction, vol. 126, p. 103116, 202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Decision Tree and Automatic Linear Modeling Approaches to Predict Body Weight in Indigenous Sabi Sheep and Matebele Goat Females of Zimbabwe
- Microcontroller – Based Automatic Railway Crossing Control and Track Obstacle Monitoring System
- Modelling the Role of Absorptive Capacity in Foreign Direct Investment - Economic Growth Nexus: A Focus on South Africa’s Manufacturing Sector
- AI-Powered Wristband for Accurate BAC Monitoring Using Smart Data Fusion
- Climate Change Impacts on Different Regions