00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Ex-Situ Actors and Their Contribution to Conservation-Development Agenda in Old Oyo National Park

Authors

Rashidat Omolola Sotolu

Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. (NG)

Pius Ogujo Egwumah

Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. (NG)

Tyonzughul Joe Orsar

Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. (NG)

Benjamin Tertsea Tyowua

Department of Wildlife and Range Management, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. (NG)

Paul Ukper Ancha

Social and Environmental Forestry, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria (NG)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000099

Subject Category: Wildlife Conservation and Rural Development

Volume/Issue: 14/10 | Page No: 830-838

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-13

Published: 2025-11-13

Abstract

Abstract: Effects of a green globe is felt even far away from the point of greening. Biodiversity protection or otherwise has far reaching effects even beyond the source zone. This has fueled the need for this research, gauging contribution of external actors on park protection in Old Oyo National Park (OONP). Two sets of questionnaire were administered to park officers and Support Zone Communities (SZCs) assisted with organized Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) in each of the six ranges of the park. Secondary data augments survey from records obtained from the park head office at Isokun. A total of 70 PMs were surveyed purposively at the Park headquarters and at the six ranges. From a sampling frame of 30%, a total of 40 villages were randomly and unevenly pooled from all six range stations depending on number of villages per range. Five households were randomly selected each and the household heads were purposively sampled. This was aided with FGD sessions. Most (74%) of the SZCs engage in farming, some (22.5%) practice both hunting and herding with overlap in each case. Average annual PCI for the SZCs was lesser than that of the PMs. External actors engage with the SZCs in economic empowerment, park-community synergy and more. These activities were agreed by PMs (42.86%) to be in concord with sustainable conservation, while SZCs agreed that park-community collaboration benefit them (66.5%). Community empowerment and partnership among others are inevitable to attain social acceptability, economic viability and ecological sustainability of park resources.

Keywords

Sustainable Conservation, Park Partnership, Collaboration, Economic Empowerment, Projects

Downloads

References

1. Adams W.M. & Hutton J. (2007): People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Cons Soc. 5(2):147–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/263928. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akosim C., Bode A.S., Kwaga B.T. & Dishan E.E. (2010): Perceptions and Involvement of Neighbouring Communities of Kainji Lake National Park Towards The Parks Conservation Programmes. Journ. Res. in For., Wild. and Env., 2(1): 44-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Andrew-Essien E.E., (2018): Strengthening Park Management Effectiveness for Natural Resource Sustainability in the Cross River National Park (CRNP), Nigeria. Proceedings of 6th NSCB Biodiversity Conference; UNIUYO 2018. Pp: 233-237. https://nscbconf2018.wordpress.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anwadike B.C. (2020): Biodiversity Conservation in Nigeria: Perception, Challenges and Possible Remedies. Current Investigations In Agriculture and Current Research. LUPINE Publishers. ISSN: 2637-4676. Pp: 1109-1115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Archabald, K. & Naughton-Treves, L. (2001): Tourism Revenue Sharing Around National Parks In Western Uganda: Early Efforts to Identify and Reward Local Communities. Env. Cons. 28(2):135–149. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892901000145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. AWF (2024): African Wildlife Foundation Statement on United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change COP29 Outcomes. PRESS RELEASE. Retrieved 24th December, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bob Strauss & Betsy Petrick (2024): The Top 10 Wildlife Conservation Organizations. Treehugger; Sustainability for All. http://www.treehugger.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dudley N., Robinson J., Andelman S., Bingham H., Conzo L.A., Geldmann J., Groruld-Colvert K., Gurney G., Hickey V., Hockings M., Jonas H., Kettunen M., Marnewick D., Masozera M., Mitchell B., Parrish J., Redford K., Espinoza A.R., Russi D., Salafsky N., Springer J., Sullivan-Stack J., Tugendhat H., Watson J.E.M., Wilkie D. & Woodley S. (2022): Developing An Outcomes-Based Approach To Achieving Target 3 Of The Global Biodiversity Framework. Parks Vol. (28)2. Pp: 33-44. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2ND.en. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Glemarec Y., Dloghlaf A. & Da Fonseca G.A.B. (2010): Forward In Ervin J., Sekhran N., Dinu V., Gidda S, Vergeichik M. & Mee J. (2010). Protected Areas for the 21st Century: Lessons from UNDP/GEF’s Portfolio. New York United Nations Development Programme and Montreal Convention on Biological Diversity. 132pp. ISBN: 92-9225-274-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Harrison, M., Baker, J., Twinamatsiko, M. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2015): Profiling Unauthorized Natural Resource Users for Better Targeting of Conservation Interventions Understanding The Profiles and Motivations of Resource Users and Local Perceptions of Governance at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, Cons. Biol 29(6):1636–1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Holmes-Watts T & Watts S. (2008): Legal Frameworks for and the Practice of Participatory Natural Resources Management in South Africa. For. Policy. Econ. 10:435–443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. https://www.iucn.org/news/forests/201701/people-centered-governance-and-restoration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. King B. (2010): Conservation Geographies in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Politics of National Parks, Community Conservation and Peace Parks. Geography Compass 4(1): 14-27. ResearchGate. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00288.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Muhumuza M. & Balkwill K. (2013): Factors Affecting The Success of Conserving Biodiversity in National Parks: a Review of Case Studies from Africa. Terlizzi A. (ed.). vol. 2013(1). Pp: 20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/798101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mulonga S., Mfune J., Willemse N., Humavindu M., Canniffe B. & Nghishidi J. (2014): Namibia’s Second National Biodiversity Strategy Action Plan 2013-2022. Republic of Namibia, Ministry of Environment and Tourism. De Voss N. (ed.). xi+59pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pisani, D., Pazienza, P., Perrino, E.V., Caporale, D. & De Lucia, C. (2021). The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services of Biodiversity Components in Protected Areas: A Review For a Framework of Analysis For The Gargano National Park. Sustainability 13(21):11726 doi.org/10.3390/su132111726. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schwass R.D. (2024): Introduction to Sustainable Development. World Conservation Strategy of The International Union For The Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 26pp. York University, Toronto, Canada. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). http://www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Thondhlana G, Cundill G & Kepe T. (2016): Co-Management, Land Rights, and Conflicts Around South Africa’s Silaka Nature Reserve. Soc. Nat. Res. 29:(4)403–417. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1089609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Toyobo A.E., Raheem W.M. & Oyoleye O.I. (2014): Conservation Strategies of Wildlife Resources in The Old Oyo National Park, Nigeria. Int. Journ. Adv. Sci. & Techn Res. Issue 4 (4). Pp: 526-537. ISSN: 2249-6654. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Twinamatsiko M., Franks P., Booker F., Muchunguzi C. & Murembe C.N. (2022): Alternative Approaches to Integrated Conservation and Development: Equitable Governance at Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Parks. Vol. 28(2). Pp: 23-32. Doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.PARKS-28-2MT.en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Twinamatsiko, M., Baker, J., Harrison, M., Shirkhorshidi, M., Bitariho, R., Weiland, M., Asuma, S., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Franks, P. & Roe, D. (2014): Linking Conservation, Equity and Poverty Alleviation. Understanding the Profiles and Motivations of Resource Users and Local Perceptions of Governance at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. London: IIED. Doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4853.4409. https://pubs.iied.org/14630IIED. ISBN: 978-1-78431-073-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNEP-WCMC (2018): 2018 United Nations List of Protected Areas. Supplement on Protected Area Management Effectiveness. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. iv+63. ISBN: 987-92-807-3717-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UNESCO (2023): World Heritage: A Unique Contribution to Biodiversity Conservation. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Digital Library. 15pp. www.unesco.org. https://doi.org/10.58337/LSRE8424 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Walters G. (2017): People-Centered Governance and Restoration. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Document. Viewed June 2, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Chadzon R.L., Wilson S.J., Brondizio E., Guariguata M.R. & Herbohn J. (2020): Key Challenges for Governing Forest and landscape Restoration Across Different Contexts. Vol 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.