Green Bond Investment Dynamics Among Retail Investors in India: Knowledge, Perception and Willingness to Invest

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Ms. Shilpi Pandey
Dr. Krishna Murari

Purpose: This study examines retail investors' awareness, perceptions, and willingness to invest in green bonds within India's evolving sustainable finance landscape. It seeks to bridge the critical knowledge gap between policy-driven green finance initiatives and actual retail market participation by identifying key barriers and enablers influencing investment behaviour. The research provides empirical insights into how demographic factors, financial literacy, and market structures shape sustainable investment decisions in emerging economies.


Methodology: The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of survey responses from 100 retail investors with qualitative thematic analysis of 20 in-depth interviews. Data collection focused on four dimensions: awareness levels, risk-return perceptions, investment willingness, and structural barriers. Statistical analysis included descriptive metrics and correlation studies, while interview transcripts were coded using NVivo to identify recurring themes. The sample was stratified across age groups, education levels, and occupational categories to ensure representative insights.


Findings: The results reveal moderate but uneven awareness, with higher recognition among older (46+ years) and more educated investors. Key findings include: (1) significant conceptual confusion regarding green bonds' environmental purpose, with many associating them incorrectly with infrastructure (27.6%) and education (25.0%); (2) equal weighting of financial returns (20.5%) and environmental impact (20.5%) in investment decisions; (3) pervasive trust deficits, with 43.6% expressing scepticism due to greenwashing concerns; and (4) structural barriers including limited accessibility and preference for traditional instruments. Notably, 41.6% of respondents demonstrated positive reception, suggesting untapped market potential conditional on policy interventions.


Originality: This study contributes novel insights into sustainable finance behaviour in three key dimensions. First, it provides the first comprehensive assessment of India's retail green bond market, filling a critical gap in emerging market research. Second, it introduces an integrated framework analysing both cognitive barriers (trust deficits, knowledge gaps) and structural constraints (market access, liquidity). Third, the findings challenge conventional assumptions by demonstrating how Indian investors equally weigh financial and ethical considerations—a departure from dominant Western models emphasizing environmental values. The research offers evidence-based policy recommendations for accelerating retail participation in sustainable finance transitions.

Green Bond Investment Dynamics Among Retail Investors in India: Knowledge, Perception and Willingness to Invest. (2025). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 14(10), 839-850. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000100

Downloads

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bansal, S. (2020). Green Bonds-Trend and Challenges in India. Journal of Business Management and Information Systems, 7(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2020.0701003

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brest, P., & Born, K. (2023). Effective philanthropy: Making the most of your giving. MIT Press.

Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI). (2023). Global state of the market report 2023. https://www.climatebonds.net

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Dikau, S., & Volz, U. (2021). Central bank mandates, sustainability objectives and the promotion of green finance. Ecological Economics, 184, 107022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107022

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

Ghosh, S. (2022). Sustainable finance in emerging markets: Evolution and future prospects. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(3), 456-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.2010952

GSIA. (2023). Global sustainable investment review.

Gutsche, G., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of behavioural factors on investors' green bond investment decisions. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101509

International Capital Market Association (ICMA). (2022). Green Bond Principles: Voluntary process guidelines. https://www.icmagroup.org

IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch

Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383

Ministry of Finance, India. (2023). Sovereign green bonds framework. https://www.finmin.nic.in

Mittal, R., & Gupta, P. (2022). Behavioural biases in green investment decisions: Evidence from India. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Finance, 34, 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100659

National Centre for Financial Education (NCFE). (2019). National survey on financial literacy in India. https://www.ncfe.org.in

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Green bonds: Mobilising the debt capital markets for a low-carbon transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264242323-en

Park, J., & Kim, S. (2022). The retail participation paradox in sustainable finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), 543-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.10.003

Patel, R., Kumar, S., & Jain, A. (2023). The awareness-access-trust framework for green finance adoption in emerging markets. World Development, 161, 106128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106128

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Prajapati, D., Paul, D., Malik, S., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). Understanding the preference of individual retail investors on green bond in India: an empirical study. Business Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(1).2021.15

RBI. (2023). Report on green finance in India. https://www.rbi.org.in

Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2023). Report on currency and finance 2022-23: Towards a greener cleaner India. https://www.rbi.org.in

Reserve Bank of India. (2024). Discussion paper on climate risk disclosures. https://www.rbi.org.in

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

SEBI. (2021). Green debt securities regulations. https://www.sebi.gov.in

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). (2021). Disclosure requirements for issuance and listing of green debt securities. Circular No. SEBI/HO/DDHS/DDHS-RACPOD1/P/CIR/2021/613. https://www.sebi.gov.in

Singh, N., Singh, P. K., & Kumar, R. (2025). Green bond sustainable infrastructure development in India. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem44388

World Bank. (2023). Green bonds: A strategic tool for climate finance. https://www.worldbank.org

Article Details

How to Cite

Green Bond Investment Dynamics Among Retail Investors in India: Knowledge, Perception and Willingness to Invest. (2025). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 14(10), 839-850. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000100