Economic and War Crimes Courts Could Deepen National Security, Peace and Development in Liberia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract: The research reviewed the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts as a crucial mechanism to address persisting human security challenges and abuses in Liberia. The aftermath of conflicts left Liberia grappling with numerous challenges, ranging from economic instability to the absence of justice for victims of war crimes and economic crimes. In pursuit of sustainable peace and human security, the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts (WECC) for Liberia has been proposed as a mechanism to address the legacies of violence and impunity. This paper reviewed the necessity, feasibility, and potential impact of implementing a WECC in Liberia. This article provides insights into the potential of WECC mechanisms as a catalyst for long-term peace, stability and human security in Liberia. The findings showed that the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts for Liberia have the potential to contribute significantly to the country's efforts to achieve enhanced peace, justice, reconciliation, and sustainable development. However, it would require political will, financial resources, and robust institutional support to effectively be implemented. The Government will have to seek support, including funding, technical assistance, and expertise, from the international community to assist with the establishment and functioning of the War and Economic Crimes Courts separately. Also, the Government should collaborate with civil society organizations, international partners, and the public to build consensus on and support for the establishment of the courts for Economic Crimes and War Crimes. This involves conducting awareness campaigns, hosting public forums, and facilitating nationally inclusive dialogue to address concerns and garner backing for the process.
Downloads
References
Ainley, K. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: Counteracting the Crisis. International Affairs, 87(4), 905-923. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12185.
Ainsworth, S. H. (2020). Rational choice theory in political decision making. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1019.
Akhavan, P. (2001). Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?. American Journal of International Law, 95(1), 7-31. DOI: 10.2307/761767.
Amnesty International (2018). Liberia’s compliance with the international covenant on civil and political rights report of civil society organizations in reply to the list of issues regarding impunity for past human rights violations. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wpcontent/uploads/2021/05/AFR3487352018ENGLISH.pdf
Amnesty International (2021). Liberia: Truth, justice, reparation for Liberia’s victims. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/afr340012007en.pdf
Cabrera, C.G. & Sarkarati, N. (2018). Using U.S. courts to promote accountability for the 1990 Liberian church massacre and beyond. Retrieved online from https://www.justsecurity.org/52970/u-s-courts-promote-accountability-1990-liberian-church-massacre/.
Clark, J. N. (2009). The limits of retributive justice: Findings of an empirical study in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7 (3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp041.
Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed-Method, 3rd edition, Los Ang.
Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Söderbom, M. (2003). On the duration of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 253-273. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-5481-0.
Cunha, M. (2021). Reckoning with perpetrators and collaborators: Accountability and transitional justice in Latin American Postdictatorship cinema. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 15(2), 448 458. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijab009.
De Greiff, P. (2006). The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494191.
Dowding, K. (2019). Political power and bargaining theory. Rational Choice and Political Power, 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206333.003.0004.
Evrard, E. (2023). The language of inclusion: Using critical corpus-based methods to study the presence and representation of “women, children and vulnerable groups” in Liberia’s truth commission. Social Justice Research, 1(31). DOI 10.1007/s11211-023-00411-z.
Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2005). Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593-629. DOI: 10.1177/0022002704271920.
Heliso, T. E. (2020). Critical appraisal of the Ethiopian Reconciliation Commission: A comparative study. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 11(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.5897/JLCR2020.0308.
Human Rights Watch (2022). Briefing Note on the Call for a War Crimes Court for Liberia. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/05/briefing-note-call-war-crimes-court-liberia.
Human Rights Watch (2022). US: Back War Crimes Court in Liberia :US-Africa Summit Important Moment to Support Justice for Liberian Victims. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/05/us-back-war-crimes-court-liberia.
International Committee of the Red Cross (2004). What is International Humanitarian Law? https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/what_is_ihl.pdf.
International Criminal Court (2011). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-liberia-ratifies-rome-statute-international-criminal-court#:~:text=On%2022%20September%202004%2C%20Liberia,139%20States%20are%20signatories.
Issa, K. (2023). 20 years of inaction fail to dampen activists’ hopes for justice and accountability for Liberia war atrocities. Journalist for Justice in Africa. Retrieved from https://jfjustice.net/20-years-of-inaction-fail-to-dampen-activists-hopes-for-justice-and-accountability-for-liberia-war-atrocities/.
Jalloh, C. & Marong, A. (2009). Ending Impunity: The Case for War Crimes Trials in Liberia. African Journal of Legal Studies, 1. 10.1163/221097312X13397499735986.
James-Allen, P., Weah, A., & Goodfriend, L. (2010). Beyond the truth and reconciliation commission: Transitional justice options in Liberia. International Center for Transitional Justice, pp.1-32. Retrieved from: https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Liberia-Beyond-TRC-2010-English.pdf.
Kapshuk, Y. (2022). Transitional justice from a political bargaining perspective. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 12, pp. 1–21, Retrieved from http://www.ijdc.org.in/uploads/1/7/5/7/17570463/1_kapshuk.pdf.
Kaydor, T. (2024) The Role of Corruption on Liberia’s Peace and Stability. https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-2/188-210.pdf.
Kaydor, T. (2024). Reconceptualizing Africa’s Regional Integration for Peace and Sustainable Development: A Summary Analysis of PhD Dissertation; https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.807139.
Kaydor T. (2020). Cash Transfer: A Strategic Determinant for Poverty Reduction. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., Lange Salvia A., Özuyar P.G., Wall T. (eds) No Poverty. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_107-1.
Kaydor, T. (2014). Liberian Democracy: A Critique of the Principle of Checks and Balances, Authorhouse, Bloomington, In, USA.
Keil, J.A. (2017). Liberia's TRC: The road to rule of law or a dead end? African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(8), pp. 201-209, DOI: 10.5897/AJPSIR2017.0993.
Lawther, C. (2021). ‘Let Me Tell You’: Transitional justice, victimhood and dealing with a contested past. Social & Legal Studies, 30(6), pp.890-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920974072.
Leavy, P. (2017), Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community Based Participatory Research Approaches, The Gilford Press, New York.
Pham, J. P. (2004). Liberia: Portrait of a failed state. Reed Press (NY).
Pham, P.N., Balthazard, M., Gibbons, N & Vinck, P. (2019). Perspectives on memory, forgiveness and reconciliation in Cambodia’spost-Khmer Rouge society. International Review of the Red Cross, 101 (1), 125–149. doi:10.1017/S1816383119000213.
Robert, D. (2018). Expected comparative utility theory: A new theory of rational choice. The Philosophical Forum, 49(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12178.
Rojas, H., & Shaftoe, M. (2021). Human rights and transitional justice. Human Rights and Transitional Justice in Chile, 1-28. Retrieved online from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81182-2_1
Skaar, E. (2011). Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics, and Prosecution. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 449-462.
Songa, A. (2021). Enlivening transitional justice within the African union’s agenda of silencing the guns: Looking beyond 2020. African Union Policy Paper. Retrieved from https://www.csvr.org.za/enlivening-transitional-justice-within-the-african-unions-agenda-of-silencing-the-guns-looking-beyond-2020/
Sriram, C. L. (2007). Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice. Routledge
Ward, L. (2022). Conclusion: Towards a political economy of rights and interests. Recovering Classical Liberal Political Economy, 218-221. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781399500593.003.0009
Werle, G., & Vormbaum, M. (2022). Legal principles of transitional justice. Transitional Justice, 25-38. Retrieved online from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65151-3_3
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262.
https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/02/tpls0302.pdf#page=56
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.