Economic and War Crimes Courts Could Deepen National Security, Peace and Development in Liberia

Abstract: The research reviewed the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts as a crucial mechanism to address persisting human security challenges and abuses in Liberia. The aftermath of conflicts left Liberia grappling with numerous challenges, ranging from economic instability to the absence of justice for victims of war crimes and economic crimes. In pursuit of sustainable peace and human security, the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts (WECC) for Liberia has been proposed as a mechanism to address the legacies of violence and impunity. This paper reviewed the necessity, feasibility, and potential impact of implementing a WECC in Liberia. This article provides insights into the potential of WECC mechanisms as a catalyst for long-term peace, stability and human security in Liberia. The findings showed that the establishment of War and Economic Crimes Courts for Liberia have the potential to contribute significantly to the country's efforts to achieve enhanced peace,  justice, reconciliation, and sustainable development. However, it would require political will, financial resources, and robust institutional support to effectively be implemented. The Government will have to seek support, including funding, technical assistance, and expertise, from the international community to assist with the establishment and functioning of the War and Economic Crimes Courts separately. Also, the Government should collaborate with civil society organizations, international partners, and the public to build consensus on and support for the establishment of the courts for Economic Crimes and War Crimes. This involves conducting awareness campaigns, hosting public forums, and facilitating nationally inclusive dialogue to address concerns and garner backing for the process.

Peace & Security; Sustsainable Development

1. Ainley, K. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect and the International Criminal Court: Counteracting the Crisis. International Affairs, 87(4), 905-923. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12185. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ainsworth, S. H. (2020). Rational choice theory in political decision making. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akhavan, P. (2001). Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?. American Journal of International Law, 95(1), 7-31. DOI: 10.2307/761767. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amnesty International (2018). Liberia’s compliance with the international covenant on civil and political rights report of civil society organizations in reply to the list of issues regarding impunity for past human rights violations. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wpcontent/uploads/2021/05/AFR3487352018ENGLISH.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amnesty International (2021). Liberia: Truth, justice, reparation for Liberia’s victims. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/afr340012007en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cabrera, C.G. & Sarkarati, N. (2018). Using U.S. courts to promote accountability for the 1990 Liberian church massacre and beyond. Retrieved online from https://www.justsecurity.org/52970/u-s-courts-promote-accountability-1990-liberian-church-massacre/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Clark, J. N. (2009). The limits of retributive justice: Findings of an empirical study in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7 (3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp041. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed-Method, 3rd edition, Los Ang. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Söderbom, M. (2003). On the duration of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 253-273. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-5481-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cunha, M. (2021). Reckoning with perpetrators and collaborators: Accountability and transitional justice in Latin American Postdictatorship cinema. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 15(2), 448 458. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijab009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. De Greiff, P. (2006). The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dowding, K. (2019). Political power and bargaining theory. Rational Choice and Political Power, 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206333.003.0004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Evrard, E. (2023). The language of inclusion: Using critical corpus-based methods to study the presence and representation of “women, children and vulnerable groups” in Liberia’s truth commission. Social Justice Research, 1(31). DOI 10.1007/s11211-023-00411-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2005). Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression. International Organization, 59(3), 593-629. DOI: 10.1177/0022002704271920. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Heliso, T. E. (2020). Critical appraisal of the Ethiopian Reconciliation Commission: A comparative study. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 11(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.5897/JLCR2020.0308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Human Rights Watch (2022). Briefing Note on the Call for a War Crimes Court for Liberia. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/05/briefing-note-call-war-crimes-court-liberia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Human Rights Watch (2022). US: Back War Crimes Court in Liberia :US-Africa Summit Important Moment to Support Justice for Liberian Victims. https://www.hrw.org/news/2022/12/05/us-back-war-crimes-court-liberia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. International Committee of the Red Cross (2004). What is International Humanitarian Law? https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/what_is_ihl.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. International Criminal Court (2011). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-liberia-ratifies-rome-statute-international-criminal-court#:~:text=On%2022%20September%202004%2C%20Liberia,139%20States%20are%20signatories. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Issa, K. (2023). 20 years of inaction fail to dampen activists’ hopes for justice and accountability for Liberia war atrocities. Journalist for Justice in Africa. Retrieved from https://jfjustice.net/20-years-of-inaction-fail-to-dampen-activists-hopes-for-justice-and-accountability-for-liberia-war-atrocities/. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Jalloh, C. & Marong, A. (2009). Ending Impunity: The Case for War Crimes Trials in Liberia. African Journal of Legal Studies, 1. 10.1163/221097312X13397499735986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. James-Allen, P., Weah, A., & Goodfriend, L. (2010). Beyond the truth and reconciliation commission: Transitional justice options in Liberia. International Center for Transitional Justice, pp.1-32. Retrieved from: https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Liberia-Beyond-TRC-2010-English.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kapshuk, Y. (2022). Transitional justice from a political bargaining perspective. International Journal of Development and Conflict, 12, pp. 1–21, Retrieved from http://www.ijdc.org.in/uploads/1/7/5/7/17570463/1_kapshuk.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kaydor, T. (2024) The Role of Corruption on Liberia’s Peace and Stability. https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-2/188-210.pdf. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kaydor, T. (2024). Reconceptualizing Africa’s Regional Integration for Peace and Sustainable Development: A Summary Analysis of PhD Dissertation; https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.807139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kaydor T. (2020). Cash Transfer: A Strategic Determinant for Poverty Reduction. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A.M., Brandli L., Lange Salvia A., Özuyar P.G., Wall T. (eds) No Poverty. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_107-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kaydor, T. (2014). Liberian Democracy: A Critique of the Principle of Checks and Balances, Authorhouse, Bloomington, In, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Keil, J.A. (2017). Liberia's TRC: The road to rule of law or a dead end? African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(8), pp. 201-209, DOI: 10.5897/AJPSIR2017.0993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lawther, C. (2021). ‘Let Me Tell You’: Transitional justice, victimhood and dealing with a contested past. Social & Legal Studies, 30(6), pp.890-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920974072. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leavy, P. (2017), Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community Based Participatory Research Approaches, The Gilford Press, New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pham, J. P. (2004). Liberia: Portrait of a failed state. Reed Press (NY). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Pham, P.N., Balthazard, M., Gibbons, N & Vinck, P. (2019). Perspectives on memory, forgiveness and reconciliation in Cambodia’spost-Khmer Rouge society. International Review of the Red Cross, 101 (1), 125–149. doi:10.1017/S1816383119000213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Robert, D. (2018). Expected comparative utility theory: A new theory of rational choice. The Philosophical Forum, 49(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/phil.12178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Rojas, H., & Shaftoe, M. (2021). Human rights and transitional justice. Human Rights and Transitional Justice in Chile, 1-28. Retrieved online from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81182-2_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Skaar, E. (2011). Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics, and Prosecution. Journal of Peace Research, 48(4), 449-462. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Songa, A. (2021). Enlivening transitional justice within the African union’s agenda of silencing the guns: Looking beyond 2020. African Union Policy Paper. Retrieved from https://www.csvr.org.za/enlivening-transitional-justice-within-the-african-unions-agenda-of-silencing-the-guns-looking-beyond-2020/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sriram, C. L. (2007). Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice. Routledge [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ward, L. (2022). Conclusion: Towards a political economy of rights and interests. Recovering Classical Liberal Political Economy, 218-221. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781399500593.003.0009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Werle, G., & Vormbaum, M. (2022). Legal principles of transitional justice. Transitional Justice, 25-38. Retrieved online from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65151-3_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed Method Research: Instruments, Validity, Reliability and Reporting Findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol03/02/tpls0302.pdf#page=56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Decision Tree and Automatic Linear Modeling Approaches to Predict Body Weight in Indigenous Sabi Sheep and Matebele Goat Females of Zimbabwe
• Microcontroller – Based Automatic Railway Crossing Control and Track Obstacle Monitoring System
• Modelling the Role of Absorptive Capacity in Foreign Direct Investment - Economic Growth Nexus: A Focus on South Africa’s Manufacturing Sector
• AI-Powered Wristband for Accurate BAC Monitoring Using Smart Data Fusion
• Climate Change Impacts on Different Regions