Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Reading Program on Students’ Numeracy and Problem-solving Skills

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Charmaine N. Silagan, MS MATH ED
Ian Karlo C. Silagan, MS MATH ED
Gladys S. Escarlos,PhD

This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of reading programs aligned with the Philippine Department of Education's Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) program in improving Filipino students' numeracy and problem-solving skills. The review synthesizes empirical evidence published between 2020 and 2024, focusing on studies evaluating interventions that incorporate learning recovery and accessible learning principles. A comprehensive search of multiple databases will identify relevant studies, which will then undergo rigorous methodological quality assessment. Meta-analysis will be used to determine the overall effect size of ARAL-aligned reading programs, while subgroup analyses and meta-regression will explore potential moderators of intervention effectiveness, such as student characteristics, intervention features, and contextual factors. Qualitative synthesis will examine implementation, acceptability, and feasibility aspects. The findings will provide evidence-based recommendations for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance students' numeracy and problem-solving abilities through targeted reading programs within the ARAL framework. This review will contribute to optimizing the design and implementation of the ARAL program, maximizing its impact on foundational skills and promoting equitable access to quality education for Filipino students.

Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Reading Program on Students’ Numeracy and Problem-solving Skills. (2025). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 14(11), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000030

Downloads

References

Abedin, M. Z., Danial, M., & Gupta, A. (2020). The relationship between reading comprehension and mathematical problem-solving skills: A meta-analysis. 112(5), 913-932. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000399

Azevedo, J., Hasan, A., Goldemberg, D., Geven, K., & Iqbal, S. (2021). Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates. The World Bank.

Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, D. Goodman, & J. Joshi (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice. 3-27(3rd). Routledge. Retrieved November 23, 2025

Bettinger, L., Loeb, S., & Somers, J. (2022). The methodology and the evidence on learning loss from COVID-19 school closures. 22-528. EdWorkingPaper.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Dela Cruz, A. B. (2021). Enhanced reading program with math integration: A randomized controlled trial. 10(2), 45-60. Philippine Journal of Educational Research.

Department of Education (DepEd). (2022). DepEd Order No. 001, s. 2022: Implementation of the national learning recovery program. Pasig City, Philippines. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/DO_s2022_001.pdf

Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., & Viruleg, E. (2020). COVID-19 and student learning in the United States: The hurt could last for years.

Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. (2021). Learning inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(17), e2022376118.

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2021). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. 21(2), 97-100. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12314

Garcia, H. I. (2024). Integrated literacy and numeracy program: A randomized controlled trial. 25(1), 1-15. The Modern Teacher.

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. 7(1), 6-10. Remedial and Special Education. Retrieved November 23, 2025

Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education. 7(1),6-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/

Reyes, C. D. (2022). Remedial reading intervention with numeracy focus: A quasi-experimental study. 15(1), 123-138. Asia Pacific Journal of Curriculum and Instruction.

Santos, E. F. (2023). ARAL-modeled reading intervention: A single-group pre-post study. 20(3), 78-92. Journal of Philippine Education.

UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from https://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/

Article Details

How to Cite

Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Reading Program on Students’ Numeracy and Problem-solving Skills. (2025). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 14(11), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000030