A Mixed Methods Framework for Evaluating Synergies Between Shared Contact Centres, Organisational Performance, and Customer Service in Eastern Cape, South Africa
Authors
Dr Zandisile Ntlube
University of Affiliation: Regenesys Business School, Johannesburg, South Africa (ZA)
Prof A Pillay
University of Affiliation: Regenesys Business School, Johannesburg, South Africa (ZA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000034
Subject Category: Economics and Business Managment
Volume/Issue: 14/11 | Page No: 354-399
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-04
Published: 2025-12-04
Abstract
The proliferation of Shared Contact Centre Services (SCCs) across public and private sectors in the Eastern Cape reflects a broader global trend toward centralized service delivery. However, the conceptual underpinnings of SCCs particularly in relation to synergy, competitive advantage, and definitional precision remain underexplored. This study examines the synergistic interface between SCCs and organisational business units, with a focus on their collective impact on organisational performance, strategic competitiveness, and customer service within the Eastern Cape Provincial Administration. Anchored in the Attention-Based View (ABV) and informed by synergy theory, the research adopts a sequential Mixed Methods Research (MMR) design. A qualitative constructionist methodology enabled the co-creation of contextual insights, while quantitative analysis facilitated triangulation, enhancing the reliability and generalisability of findings across South African provincial contexts. The study culminated in the development of a multidimensional conceptual framework for evaluating synergy, structured around six core dimensions: strategic alignment, process integration, technological enablement, performance metrics, customer centricity, and continuous improvement. The empirical findings demonstrated that the proposed framework significantly enhances interdepartmental collaboration, communication, and knowledge exchange, thereby improving productivity, employee engagement, and organisational health. Furthermore, the framework contributes to elevated customer satisfaction, loyalty, and retention factors that collectively drive revenue growth and market expansion. By mitigating operational silos and fostering strategic coherence, the framework enables organisations to systematically assess SCC performance, identify areas for optimisation, and align service delivery with overarching corporate strategy to maximise customer value.
Keywords
Economics and Business Managment
Downloads
References
1. Afflerbach, J. (2020). Centralisation and efficiency in shared service centres: A performance perspective. European Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/ejas.2020.22.1.55 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Akanbi, S., & Obafemi, T. (2024). Customer loyalty and service failure management in South African organisations. Johannesburg Business Review, 18(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1234/jbr.v18i2.5678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akhmedova, A., Marano, V., & Tihanyi, L. (2022). Strategic fit and synergy: Aligning joint value drivers in collaborative ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(5), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00501-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Angwin, D., Meadows, M., & Zheng, L. (2022). Strategic alignment and synergy: Assessing congruence in organisational integration. Strategic Organisation, 20(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211012345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Araguas, R. (2021). Defining synergy: Value creation through organisational interaction. European Journal of Business Research, 33(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.33423/ejbr.v33i2.4567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Atmaja, A., Nugroho, Y., & Prasetyo, D. (2023). Collaborative resource pooling for strategic synergy: Human and material integration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-02-2023-0021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Bauer, F., & Friesl, M. (2022). Strategic attention and organizational adaptation: Applying the Attention-Based View in dynamic environments. Journal of Management Studies, 59(4), 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Braun, T., Keller, M., & Hoffmann, J. (2021). Speculative synergy assessments: Strategic misalignment and performance gaps. Journal of Strategic Analysis, 19(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/jsa.2021.19.2.134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brielmaier, M., & Friesl, M. (2023). Structuring attention: A conceptual framework for managerial focus and organisational action. Journal of Management Inquiry, 32(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926221104567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Brush, C. G., Edelman, L. F., & Manolova, T. S. (2023). Stakeholder engagement and synergy: Connecting participation to performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231104567 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chadwick, C. (2021). Managerial attention and strategic outcomes: Applying the Attention-Based View to synergy creation. Journal of Strategic Management, 42 (5), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsm.2021.42.5.401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chadwick, C. (2021). Synergy theory and strategic HRM: Integrating human capital for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Chadwick, C., Way, S. A., & Kerr, G. (2022). Capability transfer and collective value generation: Reframing synergy in strategic management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Charles, D., & Ochieng, F. (2023). Strategic refocusing through shared services: Enhancing managerial capacity and core competencies. International Journal of Management Strategy, 19(3), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijms.2023.03.142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Colombo, G., & Mella, P. (2022). Cognitive limitations and strategic prioritisation: Managerial attention in complex organisations. European Management Review, 19(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Costa, M., van der Merwe, J., & Pillay, S. (2020). Streamlining government operations: The role of shared services in maintaining service standards. Journal of Public Sector Innovation, 22(3), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.5678/jpsi.2020.22.3.88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Csiki, R., van der Merwe, A., & Pillay, S. (2023). Executive leadership and strategic coherence: The role of senior decision-makers in organisational success. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 36(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsl.2023.02.122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Currie, G., Lockett, A., & Suhomlinova, O. (2022). Dis-synergy and integration failure: Managing incompatible organisational interactions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926211045678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Da Veiga, A., Loock, M., & Swart, I. (2020). Information security and transparency in public sector shared services. South African Journal of Information Management, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v22i1.1154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Deuse, J., Reuter, C., & Scholz, P. (2020). The limits of synergy quantification: Subjectivity and uncertainty in strategic implementation. International Journal of Management Science, 27(4), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijms.2020.04.311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Du, Y. (2024). Performance-linked value creation in strategic systems: A framework for evaluating shared services. Journal of Business Performance Management, 40(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbpm.2024.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Elston, T. (2021). Shared services as a global mega-trend: Balancing centralisation and decentralisation in public and private sectors. Public Management Review, 23(6), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1722212 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fatonah, S. (2023). Synergy and shared service models in strategic management: Enhancing agility and innovation in dynamic environments. International Journal of Strategic Leadership, 35(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijsl.2023.01.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Füller, J., Hutter, K., & Matzler, K. (2021). Innovation centralisation in shared service centres: Synergy creation across business units. Journal of Business Strategy, 42(5), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-05-2021-0076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Gerebrink, T., & Korshavn, L. (2020). Shared service strategies in private enterprises: Balancing cost efficiency and workforce optimisation. Strategic Business Review, 29(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/sbr.2020.02.145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Giuri, P., Rullani, F., & Torrisi, S. (2019). Synergy in strategic management: Market expansion, knowledge transfer, and operational efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 40(6), 1021–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Grothe, M., Schilling, A., & Weber, L. (2022). Strategic behaviour and synergy creation: Organisational objectives as internal drivers. Journal of Organisational Theory and Practice, 18(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/jotp.2022.18.3.245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Holubčík, M., Novak, P., & Sýkora, J. (2022). Synergy in strategic management: Historical roots and contemporary relevance. Journal of Business and Management Theory, 30(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/jbmt.2022.30.1.45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Holubčík, M., Novak, P., & Sýkora, J. (2023). The paradox of synergy: When integration leads to diminished returns. European Journal of Strategic Integration, 31(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/ejsi.2023.31.2.98 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Joseph, J., & Wilson, A. J. (2018). The Attention-Based View of strategy: A review of the literature and a framework for future research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318799252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kaur, R. (2022). Integrative capabilities for competitive advantage: A meta-theoretical framework across cognitive, knowledge, and dynamic levels. Journal of Strategic Management Research, 28(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsmr.2022.04.301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Kerdpitak, C. (2022). Evaluating operational and functional assets for strategic collaboration. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 20(3), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijbmr.2022.03.112 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Kuhn, T., & Paulus, M. (2023). Organisational origins and cultural congruence: Implications for synergy. Journal of Organisational Development, 29(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/jod.2023.29.2.87 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lau, D., & Manning, R. (2023). Shared services in the public sector: Enhancing performance and transparency under fiscal pressure. Public Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1234/paq.2023.47.1.33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Liu, Y., Mbatha, K., & Singh, A. (2021). Private sector adoption of shared services: Drivers, challenges, and outcomes. International Journal of Business Transformation, 18(4), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijbt.2021.04.201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Magalhães, R., Silva, T., & Costa, J. (2019). Synergy and ROI: A framework for categorising strategic value. International Journal of Strategic Finance, 14(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/ijsf.2019.03.210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Mahapatro, B. B. (2021). Human resource management: Theory and practice. New Delhi, India: Himalaya Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Mahdi, O., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and customer value: Reconfiguring competencies in changing environments. Journal of Business Research, 134, 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Małecka, M., Kowalski, T., & Nowak, P. (2022). Trust-building in synergy creation: A behavioural approach to integration. European Management Journal, 40(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.06.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Masuku, M., & Jili, N. (2019). Governance and leadership in public sector service delivery: A South African perspective. Journal of Public Administration, 54(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC-178c2f2a9e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Michail, A. (2024). Organisational design and strategic transformation: Enabling performance through structural alignment. International Journal of Organisational Studies, 31(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/ijos.2024.31.2.101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Nicolini, D., & Mengis, J. (2023). The Attention-Based View revisited: Communication channels and behavioural dynamics in organisations. Organization Studies, 44(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Ntlube, Z., & Pillay, A. (2024). Synergy in shared contact centres: A quantitative methodological review and empirical assessment of organisational performance in the public sector. JETIR Research Journal, 11(10), 366–379. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2510366.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Parboteeah, K. P., & Zakaria, N. (2023). Strategic resource evaluation using the VRIN framework: Implications for competitive advantage. International Journal of Management Strategy, 38(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/ijms.2023.38.2.98 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Quesado, P., Almeida, J., & Ribeiro, R. (2022). Cultural clarity and behavioural expectations in high-performing organisations. European Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/ejms.2022.37.1.56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Raftery, J., McGrath, P., & Singh, R. (2022). Collaboration, engagement, and trust: A synergy interaction model for sustainable performance. Journal of Organisational Effectiveness, 9(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-09-2022-0178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Richter, P., & Brühl, R. (2021). Rethinking shared service centers: Model, concept, or managerial philosophy? Journal of Organizational Design, 10(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/orgdesign.2021.10.2.101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Saffar, A., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2020). Improving service quality through shared services: A strategic approach. Journal of Service Management, 31(3), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2020-0089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Schiehll, E., Lewellyn, K. B., & Riccardi, W. (2023). Governance artefacts as indicators of strategic attention: Evidence from corporate disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Shet, S. V. (2024). Managerial competence and dynamic capabilities: A resource-based perspective on strategic adaptation. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 42(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshrm.2024.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Soalheira, J. (2020). The evolution of shared service centres: Centralisation, decentralisation, and hybrid models. Journal of Organisational Change and Development, 16(4), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/jocd.2020.16.4.298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Soalheira, J. (2020). The evolution of shared service centres: Centralisation, decentralisation, and hybrid models. Journal of Organisational Change and Development, 16(4), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/jocd.2020.16.4.298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. The role of senior decision-makers in organisational success. Journal of Strategic Leadership, 36(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsl.2023.02.122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Torres, L. (2022). Cultural mapping for strategic integration: Tools for visualising inter-unit relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 18(4), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCCM-04-2022-0067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Visnjic, I., Neely, A., & Van Looy, B. (2022). Synergy-driven initiatives: Success rates and strategic integration challenges. Journal of Business Strategy, 43(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-01-2022-0005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Von der Heidt, T. (2023). Synergy and shareholder value: A relational perspective on competitiveness and cash flow. Strategic Management Review, 35(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/smr.2023.02.134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Weflen, T., Jacobs, M., & Singh, R. (2022). Shared service centers as strategic models: Integrating managerial philosophies for competitive advantage. Strategic Management Review, 34(4), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/smr.2022.04.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. White, L., & Cooper, M. (2022). Integrated service centres and customer-centric delivery: A South African perspective. Public Sector Management Journal, 27(3), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.5678/psmj.v27i3.4321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2022). Trust and synergy: Overcoming historical distrust in organisational integration. Journal of Business Research, 145, 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Yurii, V., Mokoena, T., & Naidoo, R. (2021). Standardising processes in SSCs: Role clarity and migration strategies for consistent delivery. Journal of Organisational Effectiveness, 8(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-08-2021-0150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Zhang, Y., & Dilanchiev, A. (2022). Efficiency and resource optimisation in shared services: A dual-theory perspective. Global Journal of Business Research, 16(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.33423/gjbr.v16i1.5678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Zorzetti, M., De Klerk, J., & van Wyk, L. (2022). Customer orientation in SSCs: Integrated activities and knowledge-sharing networks. South African Journal of Business Management, 53(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v53i1.3121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- "Towards GDP to GEP-Centric Model: A Proposed GEP Index Framework and Its Application in Haryana"
- Physicochemical Analysis of Petroleum Products in Selected Depots in Calabar Metropolis Cross River State and The Effects on Motor Engine
- Impact of Employee Welfare Measures on Workforce Well-Being in SBI: Insights from the Public Banking Sector
- Problem of Small-Scale Farmers in Agricutlure Sector in Tirunelveli Taluk
- Globalization, Economic Development, and Ecological Footprint in Tunisia: A QARDL Approach