00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Evaluation, Agreement and Interpretation of Independent Radiologist Assessments - ROC Analysis

Authors

Srikanth Chivukula

Rayalaseema University (IN)

Dr. Uma Shankar

Rayalaseema University (IN)

Dr. Raghunath Reddy

Rayalaseema University (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000040

Subject Category: Applied Science

Volume/Issue: 14/11 | Page No: 463-468

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-06

Published: 2025-12-06

Abstract

ROC curves are useful for comparing two independent observations and the outcomes of their assessments for the same disease in a given study.  In general, the test with the higher AUC may be considered better and is an effective way to summarize the overall diagnostic accuracy of the test. AUC scores are convenient to compare multiple classifiers. Nonetheless, it is also important to check the actual curves especially when evaluating the final model. In the ROC curve analysis, the choice of the optimal cutoff value depends both on probabilistic and clinical considerations. From a probabilistic standpoint, one can use the coordinates of the ROC curve to identify the cutoff that maximizes the discrimination between true-positive rate and false-positive rate(1).


The name "Receiver Operating Characteristic" came from. ROC analysis is part of a field called "Signal Detection Theory" (3) developed during World War II for the analysis of radar images. It was not until the 1970's that signal detection theory(4) was recognized as useful for interpreting medical test results.

Keywords

Sensitivity, Specificity, ROC curve, Area under the curve (AUC), Kappa

Downloads

References

1. Swets JA. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. Psychol Bull. 1986;99:100–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. "Logical Analysis in Roentgen Diagnosis": Published in the journal Radiology, Key Publications by Lusted in 1960 ; Lusted LB. Logical analysis in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology. 1960;74:178–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dorfman, D. D., & Alf, E., Jr. (1968). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory—A direct solution. Psychometrika, 33(1), 117–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. First ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1966. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dorfman DD, Alf EJR. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory - a direct solution. Psychometrika. 1968;33:117–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. FORTRAN programs ROCFIT, CORROC2, LABROC1 and LABROC4, ROCKIT. Available at:http://www.radiology.uchicago.edu/krk/KRL_ROC/software_index6.htm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, SargentD, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solidtumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer2009;45:228-247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. The R Journal: article published in 2016, volume 8:2; Dincer Goksuluk, Selcuk Korkmaz, Gokmen Zararsiz and A. Ergun Karaagaoglu , The R Journal (2016) 8:2, pages 213-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.