Evaluation, Agreement and Interpretation of Independent Radiologist Assessments - ROC Analysis
Authors
Srikanth Chivukula
Rayalaseema University (IN)
Dr. Uma Shankar
Rayalaseema University (IN)
Dr. Raghunath Reddy
Rayalaseema University (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000040
Subject Category: Applied Science
Volume/Issue: 14/11 | Page No: 463-468
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-06
Published: 2025-12-06
Abstract
ROC curves are useful for comparing two independent observations and the outcomes of their assessments for the same disease in a given study. In general, the test with the higher AUC may be considered better and is an effective way to summarize the overall diagnostic accuracy of the test. AUC scores are convenient to compare multiple classifiers. Nonetheless, it is also important to check the actual curves especially when evaluating the final model. In the ROC curve analysis, the choice of the optimal cutoff value depends both on probabilistic and clinical considerations. From a probabilistic standpoint, one can use the coordinates of the ROC curve to identify the cutoff that maximizes the discrimination between true-positive rate and false-positive rate(1).
The name "Receiver Operating Characteristic" came from. ROC analysis is part of a field called "Signal Detection Theory" (3) developed during World War II for the analysis of radar images. It was not until the 1970's that signal detection theory(4) was recognized as useful for interpreting medical test results.
Keywords
Sensitivity, Specificity, ROC curve, Area under the curve (AUC), Kappa
Downloads
References
1. Swets JA. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models. Psychol Bull. 1986;99:100–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. "Logical Analysis in Roentgen Diagnosis": Published in the journal Radiology, Key Publications by Lusted in 1960 ; Lusted LB. Logical analysis in roentgen diagnosis. Radiology. 1960;74:178–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Dorfman, D. D., & Alf, E., Jr. (1968). Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory—A direct solution. Psychometrika, 33(1), 117–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. First ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1966. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dorfman DD, Alf EJR. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory - a direct solution. Psychometrika. 1968;33:117–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. FORTRAN programs ROCFIT, CORROC2, LABROC1 and LABROC4, ROCKIT. Available at:http://www.radiology.uchicago.edu/krk/KRL_ROC/software_index6.htm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, SargentD, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solidtumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer2009;45:228-247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. The R Journal: article published in 2016, volume 8:2; Dincer Goksuluk, Selcuk Korkmaz, Gokmen Zararsiz and A. Ergun Karaagaoglu , The R Journal (2016) 8:2, pages 213-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- "Towards GDP to GEP-Centric Model: A Proposed GEP Index Framework and Its Application in Haryana"
- Physicochemical Analysis of Petroleum Products in Selected Depots in Calabar Metropolis Cross River State and The Effects on Motor Engine
- Impact of Employee Welfare Measures on Workforce Well-Being in SBI: Insights from the Public Banking Sector
- Problem of Small-Scale Farmers in Agricutlure Sector in Tirunelveli Taluk
- Globalization, Economic Development, and Ecological Footprint in Tunisia: A QARDL Approach