Comparative Analysis of Maize and Sorghum Yields under Different Fertilizer Application in Oke Ose, Kwara State, Nigeria
Authors
Adeniyi Adedapo
Department of Geography, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin (NG)
Ajadi B. S
Department of Geography, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin (NG)
Banjoko, I. K.
Department of Agricultural Technology, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin (NG)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1411000078
Subject Category: Agricultural Technology
Volume/Issue: 14/11 | Page No: 843-850
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-17
Published: 2025-12-17
Abstract
This paper examines the comparative analysis of maize and sorghum yields under different fertilizer application. Maize and sorghum were planted on a land area of 50m2 each. The 50m2 of land for maize and sorghum was further divided into two. NPK fertilizer was applied to one half while urea fertilizer was applied to the other half of land for maize and sorghum. The yields of maize and sorghum were calculated. The Physicochemical characteristics of the soil were analyzed using Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Methods. Descriptive statistic, mean, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t- test statistic were used in data analysis. The result of the Laboratory analysis of the soil reveals that the soil is sandy and slightly acidic with low Nitrogen, Organic carbon, Organic Matter, and Potassium. The result of the Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that there is no significant difference in the values of the physicochemical parameters selected. This implies that the soil in the study area is relatively the same in term of physicochemical characteristics. In term of crop yield, the result of the study reveals that the average yield of maize under NPK and urea fertilizer is 1.69t/ha and 1.30t/ha respectively. Similarly, the yields of sorghum under NPK and urea fertilizer is 1.58t/h and 1.22t/h respectively. This implies that, in term of yields, maize and sorghum performed best when treated with NPK fertilizer than urea fertilizer. However, the result of t-test statistic shows that there is a significant difference in yields of maize and sorghum under NPK and Urea fertilizers because the p values for maize and sorghum, 0.0319 and 0.0222 respectively, are less than 0.05. Therefore, the study recommend application of NPK fertilizer for both maize and sorghum crops for better productivity.
Keywords
Maize, NPK fertilizer, Sorghum, Urea fertilizer, Yield
Downloads
References
1. Abdullahi, I. T., Alpha Y. K., Bashir, A. B., Kamaluddin, T. A., Temitope, D. A., & Jenneh, F. B. (2022). Maize yield as affected by the interaction of fertilizer nitrogen and phosphorous in Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Heliyon 8 11: 11587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Adeniyi A., Ajadi B. S. & Banjoko, A. L. (2025) Soil Fertility Status and its Implications on Agricultural Productivity in OkeOse, Ilorin East Local Government Area, Kwara State. Geo-Studies Forum, 11, (1&2) 114-122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adeniyi, A. (2013) Impact of Climate on Productivity of Selected Crops in Ilorin, Kwarar State, Nigeria Ilorin Journal of Social Sciences 15 (1): 59-66 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Adeyeye, A. S., Olalekan, K. K., Lamidi, W. A., Aji, P. O., Othman, H. J., & Ishaku, M. A. (2018) Comparative Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Sources on the Growth and Fruits Yield of Tomato (Lycoperscicum esculentum mill). International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 6, 122-126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Akanbi, W. B., Adeyeye, A. S., Ogunrinde, J. O., Babajide, P. A., Ajibola, A. T., Ilupeju, E. A. O., & Akinfasoye, J. A. (2009). Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Cutting Height on Growth, Shoot Yield and Nutrient Uptakes of Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus). Research Journal of Life and Physical Sciences, 3(1), 7-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Alvarez, R. and Steinbach, H. S. (2017) Modeling soil test phosphorus changes under fertilized and unfertilized managements using artificial neural networks. Agron. Journal. (109): 2278–2290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dillion, S. L., Frances, M. S., Robert, J. H., Giovanni C., Liz, L., & Lee, L.S. (2007) Domestication of Crop Improvement: Genetic Resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneate). Ann. Bot. 1; 100 (5): 975-989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. FAO (2009b). “New Challenges: Climate Change and Bio-energy.” FAO WSFS Issues Paper, FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. FAO (2009c). “The Technology Challenge: How to Feed the World 2050,” High-Level Export Forum, October 12–13, FAO, United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gourichon, H. (2013) Analysis of Incentives and Disincentives for Sorghum in Nigeria. Technical Notes Series, MAFAP, FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hatfield, J.L. (2006). Erosion: On-Site and Off-Site Impacts In Lal, R. (2006). Encyclopedia of Soil Science, 2nd Ed. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Jiang, M, Dong, C., Bian, W., Zhang, W. & Wang, Y. (2024) Effects of Different Fertilizer Practices on Maize yield, soil Nutrients, soil Moisture, and water Use efficiency in Northern China Based on a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 18, 14 (1) 6480. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57031-z. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Jones, J.B., Wolf, J. B. & Mills, F. L. A. (1991) Plant Analysis Handbook (Micro-Macro Pub. Inc., USA,), pp. 2l3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Liu, Y., Zou, L. & Wang, Y. (2020) Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104794 (2020). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mello, S. da C., Pierce, F.J., Tonhati, R., Almeida, G.S., Neto, D.D., & Pavuluri, K. (2018) Potato response to Polyhalite as a potassium source fertilizer in Brazil: yield and quality Hortscience, 53 (2018), pp. 373-379, 10.21273/HORTSCI12738-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sina, M. A., Farhood, Y., Bijan, K., and Edris, S. (2014) Effect of Different Urea Levels on Yield and Yield Components of Corn 704. International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research. 2, (2): 300-305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Musa, D.D. Mohammad, F.T. & Bala, A. S. (2022). Growth and Yield Response of Common Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) To Sodom Apple (Calotropis Procera Aiton.) Leaf, Stem and Root Aqueous Extracts. International Journal of Science & Engineering Technology 30 (2) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Naumann, M., Koch, M., Thiel, H., Gransee, A., & Pawelzik, E. (2020) The importance of nutrient management for potato production Part II: plant nutrition and tuber quality. Potato Res., 63, 121-137 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ning Wang, Jin, Z., Keyun, F., & Hongyu, N. (2024) Higher Sustainability and Soil Quality by Reducing Chemical Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer Application Under a Single-cotton Cropping System. Frontiers in Plant Science 15 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1494667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Oyedeji, S., Animasaun, D. A., Bello, A. A., & Agboola, O. O. (2014). Effects of NPK and Poultry manure on growth, yield and proximate composition of three amaranthus. Journal of Botany, Article ID:828750.https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/828750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Rotili, D. H., Adeledo, L. G., devoil, P., Rodriguez, D., & Maddonni, G. A. (2021) Exploring the Effect of Tillers on the water economy plant growth and Kernel set of low-density maize crops Agricultural Water Management. Elsevier 243 (C). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Samar, S. Romas, M. Jonas, B. Donata, D. & Karolina, B. (2023) Review: Modified Urea Fertilizers and Their Effects on Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) Journals Sustainability. 16 (1) 10.3390/su16010188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Umeri, C., Nwajei, S.E, and Akporherhe, H. (2022) Effect of urea fertilizer on the growth and yield of African spinach (Amaranthus hybridus L.) in derived- savanna zone of Delta State, Nigeria. J. Current Opinion Crop Sci. 3(1): 28-33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ziska, L., A. Crimmins, A. Auclair, S. DeGrasse, J.F. Garofalo, A.S. Khan, I. Loladze, A.A. Pérez de León, A. Showler, J. Thurston, and I. Walls, (2016). The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 189–216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- "Towards GDP to GEP-Centric Model: A Proposed GEP Index Framework and Its Application in Haryana"
- Physicochemical Analysis of Petroleum Products in Selected Depots in Calabar Metropolis Cross River State and The Effects on Motor Engine
- Impact of Employee Welfare Measures on Workforce Well-Being in SBI: Insights from the Public Banking Sector
- Problem of Small-Scale Farmers in Agricutlure Sector in Tirunelveli Taluk
- Globalization, Economic Development, and Ecological Footprint in Tunisia: A QARDL Approach