Ethical AI Frameworks for Responsible Internal Auditing Practices: A Conceptual and Theoretical Framework

The accelerating integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into internal auditing is reshaping assurance practices through continuous auditing, advanced analytics, and predictive risk assessment. While AI enhances audit efficiency, coverage, and timeliness, it also introduces significant ethical, accountability, and governance challenges, including algorithmic opacity, data bias, privacy risks, and the potential erosion of professional judgment. Addressing these issues is essential for preserving audit integrity and stakeholder trust in increasingly automated audit environments. This study adopts a conceptual and theory-driven approach, drawing on Stakeholder Theory, Ethical Decision-Making Theory, and Technology Governance Theory. Through a systematic synthesis of academic literature, professional auditing standards, and global ethical AI guidelines, the paper develops the Ethical AI Audit Framework (EAAF). The framework embeds core ethical principles—transparency, fairness, accountability, explainability, privacy, and integrity—across the internal audit lifecycle, from planning to follow-up. The EAAF emphasizes “human-in-command” oversight, highlights governance enablers such as ethical review mechanisms and bias audits, and identifies auditor competence as central to ethical AI outcomes. This study contributes a domain-specific ethical governance model to support responsible, transparent, and trustworthy AI-enabled internal auditing.

Artificial Intelligence, Internal Auditing, Ethics, Accountability, Governance Framework

1. Abbott, L., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence, auditing, and the ethical implications of automation. Journal of Accounting Literature, 49(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2021.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. AICPA. (2023). Audit data analytics guide: Integrating AI into assurance practices. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. W. W. Norton & Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2021). Behavioral implications of Big Data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Accounting Horizons, 35(4), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-19-032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cao, M., Chychyla, R., & Stewart, T. (2015). Big data analytics in financial statement audits. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2021). Designing trustworthy AI: A human-centered approach to developing ethical and robust artificial intelligence systems. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-strategy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. IAASB. (2022). Technology and the future of audit: Discussion paper. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. IAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India). (2024). Digital audit framework and ethical guidelines for AI-assisted auditing. ICAI Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. ICAEW. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the future of accountancy. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. https://www.icaew.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. IFAC. (2022). International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards). International Federation of Accountants. https://www.ifac.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. IIA. (2023). International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF). The Institute of Internal Auditors. https://www.theiia.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Issa, H., Sun, T., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2016). Research ideas for artificial intelligence in auditing: The formalization of audit and workforce supplementation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-10511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122*. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51730 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Accountancy, 224(6), 34–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lombardi, D., Bloch, R., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2022). The future of audit: The impact of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 45, 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Luo, Q., Meng, Q., Cai, D., & Gan, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence in auditing: Ethical challenges and governance frameworks. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(3), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04862-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. NITI Aayog. (2023). Responsible AI for all: Indian strategy on ethical artificial intelligence. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. OECD. (2021). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://oecd.ai [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. OECD. (2023). AI principles and policy frameworks for ethical governance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2016). The role of AIS in organizational learning and ethics: Toward a smart audit environment. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 21(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tschakert, N., Kokina, J., Kozlowski, S., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2021). The next frontier in auditing: Artificial intelligence and machine learning. Accounting Horizons, 35(4), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.2308/AH-2020-051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A., & Tuttle, B. (2015). Big data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 381–396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Economic Forum. (2024). Ethical AI in assurance and financial governance. World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Yoon, K. P., Hoogduin, L., & Zhang, L. (2015). Big data as complementary audit evidence. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51076 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
• Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
• Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
• Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
• Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects