Demystifying Cyber Threat Intelligence: Literature Insights and a Practical Framework
Authors
Chinmayi Padmaraj
Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)
Amisha AR
Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)
Anagha H Prashanth
Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)
Ayush BR.
Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000050
Subject Category: computer science
Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 544-548
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-02
Published: 2026-01-02
Abstract
Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) has become increasingly important as organizations face persistent and sophisticated cyberattacks. Modern digital environments—driven by cloud adoption, hyperconnectivity, and automation—require security strategies that anticipate adversarial behavior rather than respond only after incidents occur. This paper presents a concise review of CTI research and industry practices, focusing on intelligence types, analytical models, and operational applications. A streamlined conceptual framework is proposed to help undergraduate- level readers understand how CTI can be integrated into security operations. The framework emphasizes continuous intelligence requirements, structured analysis, and feedback-driven improvement. The review also highlights current limitations in CTI adoption, including data volume challenges, limited analyst expertise, and organizational barriers to information sharing.
Keywords
Cyber Threat Intelligence, CTI, Cybersecurity, Threat Analysis, MITRE ATT&CK, Cyber Kill Chain, Intelligence Lifecycle
Downloads
References
1. E. M. Hutchins, M. J. Cloppert, and R. M. Amin, “Intelligence-Driven Computer Network Defense Informed by Analysis of Adversary Campaigns,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Warfare and Security, pp. 113–125, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. S. Barnum, “Standardizing Cyber Threat Intelligence Information with STIX,” MITRE Corporation, Technical Report, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. MITRE Corporation, “ATT&CK: Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge,” MITRE Framework Documentation, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. T. Rid and B. Buchanan, “Attributing Cyber Attacks: Challenges and Opportunities,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 38, no. 1–2, pp. 4–37, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. A. Ahmad, S. B. Maynard, and G. Shanks, “A Case Study of Information Security Risk Management,” Computers & Security, vol. 100, pp. 102–113, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. R. Alabdán, “Threat Intelligence Platforms: Adoption Factors and Security Challenges,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, vol. 30, pp. 100–110, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. C. Brown and D. Pires, “Improving Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing: Barriers and Incentives,” in Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Information Sharing and Collaborative Security, pp. 1–8, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Verizon, “Data Breach Investigations Report,” Verizon Enterprise Solutions, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. FireEye, “Cyber Threat Intelligence: Understanding Adversary Campaigns,” FireEye White Paper, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mandiant, “M-Trends 2020: Insights into Today’s Breach Trends,” Mandiant Report, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. K. Scarfone and P. Mell, “Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems,” NIST Special Publication 800-94, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. N. Kontaxis, A. P. Fuchs, and A. Lanzi, “Threat Intelligence-Driven Cyber Defense,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 80–87, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. M. Conti, A. Dehghantanha, K. Franke, and S. Watson, “Internet of Things Security and Forensics: Challenges and Opportunities,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 544–546, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. D. Bianco, “The Pyramid of Pain,” SANS Institute Reading Room, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. R. Skopik, G. Settanni, and R. Fiedler, “A Problem Shared is a Problem Halved: A Survey on the Dimensions of Collective Cyber Defense,” Computers & Security, vol. 60, pp. 154–176, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
- Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
- Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
- Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
- Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects