00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Demystifying Cyber Threat Intelligence: Literature Insights and a Practical Framework

Authors

Chinmayi Padmaraj

Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)

Amisha AR

Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)

Anagha H Prashanth

Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)

Ayush BR.

Computer Science & Engineering Department (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000050

Subject Category: computer science

Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 544-548

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-02

Published: 2026-01-02

Abstract

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) has become increasingly important as organizations face persistent and sophisticated cyberattacks. Modern digital environments—driven by cloud adoption, hyperconnectivity, and automation—require security strategies that anticipate adversarial behavior rather than respond only after incidents occur. This paper presents a concise review of CTI research and industry practices, focusing on intelligence types, analytical models, and operational applications. A streamlined conceptual framework is proposed to help undergraduate- level readers understand how CTI can be integrated into security operations. The framework emphasizes continuous intelligence requirements, structured analysis, and feedback-driven improvement. The review also highlights current limitations in CTI adoption, including data volume challenges, limited analyst expertise, and organizational barriers to information sharing.

Keywords

Cyber Threat Intelligence, CTI, Cybersecurity, Threat Analysis, MITRE ATT&CK, Cyber Kill Chain, Intelligence Lifecycle

Downloads

References

1. E. M. Hutchins, M. J. Cloppert, and R. M. Amin, “Intelligence-Driven Computer Network Defense Informed by Analysis of Adversary Campaigns,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Warfare and Security, pp. 113–125, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. S. Barnum, “Standardizing Cyber Threat Intelligence Information with STIX,” MITRE Corporation, Technical Report, 2014. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. MITRE Corporation, “ATT&CK: Adversarial Tactics, Techniques, and Common Knowledge,” MITRE Framework Documentation, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. T. Rid and B. Buchanan, “Attributing Cyber Attacks: Challenges and Opportunities,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 38, no. 1–2, pp. 4–37, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. A. Ahmad, S. B. Maynard, and G. Shanks, “A Case Study of Information Security Risk Management,” Computers & Security, vol. 100, pp. 102–113, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. R. Alabdán, “Threat Intelligence Platforms: Adoption Factors and Security Challenges,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, vol. 30, pp. 100–110, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. C. Brown and D. Pires, “Improving Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing: Barriers and Incentives,” in Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Information Sharing and Collaborative Security, pp. 1–8, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Verizon, “Data Breach Investigations Report,” Verizon Enterprise Solutions, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. FireEye, “Cyber Threat Intelligence: Understanding Adversary Campaigns,” FireEye White Paper, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mandiant, “M-Trends 2020: Insights into Today’s Breach Trends,” Mandiant Report, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. K. Scarfone and P. Mell, “Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems,” NIST Special Publication 800-94, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. N. Kontaxis, A. P. Fuchs, and A. Lanzi, “Threat Intelligence-Driven Cyber Defense,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 80–87, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. M. Conti, A. Dehghantanha, K. Franke, and S. Watson, “Internet of Things Security and Forensics: Challenges and Opportunities,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 544–546, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. D. Bianco, “The Pyramid of Pain,” SANS Institute Reading Room, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. R. Skopik, G. Settanni, and R. Fiedler, “A Problem Shared is a Problem Halved: A Survey on the Dimensions of Collective Cyber Defense,” Computers & Security, vol. 60, pp. 154–176, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.