Comparative Analysis of Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Systems in The United States and Canada: Legal Structures, Outcomes, and Policy Implications (2023)
Authors
Oghenehoro Eni
Independent Researcher / Immigration and Entrepreneurship Policy Analyst LL.M., George Mason University (CA)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000065
Subject Category: MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 712-724
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-05
Published: 2026-01-05
Abstract
Motor vehicle accident (MVA) compensation systems in North America adopts distinct policy approaches, with the United States emphasizing tort-based, fault-driven frameworks, and Canada employing primarily no-fault or hybrid models. This review draws evidence from academic literature, government reports, and insurance industry sources to compare system structures, benefits, and practical outcomes as of 2023. Major differences between these provinces include the speed of access to medical care, availability of income replacement, legal costs, and eligibility for non-economic damages such as pain and suffering. Generally, no-fault and hybrid systems provide faster, more predictable support, whereas tort-based systems allow higher potential awards but often involve delayed compensation and high legal fees. However, the differences that exists across states and provinces demonstrates jurisdiction-specific effects on recovery, equity, and financial burden. The review identifies knowledge gaps, including comparative recovery trajectories and long-term outcomes, and offers recommendations for policymakers, researchers, and clinicians to enhance evidence-based informed decisions. These findings support efforts to design compensation models that balance timeliness, fairness, and sustainability for individuals affected by motor vehicle accidents.
Keywords
motor vehicle accidents, no-fault insurance, tort liability, compensation, United States, Canada
Downloads
References
1. AH Injury Law. (2023). How no-fault insurance works in Canada. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://www.ahinjurylaw.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cardata. (2023). Average cost of car insurance in the U.S. and Canada. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. https://www.cardata.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Conventus Law. (2023). A brief guide to no-fault insurance in Canada. Retrieved from https://www.conventuslaw.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Conventus Law. (2023). Tort vs. no-fault insurance: Key trade-offs in North America. Retrieved from https://www.conventuslaw.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Government of Ontario. (2023). Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (SABS). Ontario Ministry of Finance. Retrieved from https://www.ontario.ca/laws [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). (2023). Auto insurance laws by state. Retrieved from https://www.iihs.org/topics/auto-insurance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). (2023). Auto insurance: Fault and no-fault states explained. Retrieved from https://www.iihs.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Institute for Legal Reform (ILR). (2023). Tort costs and compensation in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.instituteforlegalreform.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Institute for Legal Reform (ILR). (2023). Tort costs in America: Economic impact study. Retrieved from https://www.instituteforlegalreform.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. J.D. Power. (2023). U.S. auto claims satisfaction study. Retrieved from https://www.jdpower.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. J.D. Power. (2023). U.S. auto insurance study: Claims satisfaction and policy trends. Retrieved from https://www.jdpower.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kelly, M., Kleffner, A., & Tomlinson, M. (2010). First-party versus third-party compensation for automobile accidents: Evidence from Canada. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 13(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6296.2010.01127.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. LitigationLoans.ca. (2023). Understanding no-fault vs. tort insurance in Canada. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. https://www.litigationloans.ca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. LitigationLoans.ca. (2023). Provincial personal injury systems in Canada: A comparative summary. Retrieved from https://www.litigationloans.ca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Roughley Insurance Brokers. (2023). Income replacement benefits in Canadian auto insurance. Retrieved from https://www.roughleyinsurance.ca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Sidhu Law. (2023). How Alberta’s auto insurance system works. Retrieved from https://www.sidhu-law.ca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Statistics Canada. (2023). Health and injury outcomes for Canadians: Insurance and recovery data. Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Statistics Canada. (2023). Injury and compensation systems: Cross-jurisdictional research framework. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-229-x/82-229-x2023001-eng.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
- Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
- Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
- Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
- Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects