Citizenship Rules: How Long, How Hard, And How Fair Are the Processes?

Citizenship is more than just a legal status; it is a gateway to political participation, social inclusion, and long-term security. However, globally, states regulate access to citizenship through rules that determine how long applicants must reside, how challenging the process is, and how decisions are made to conform with standards. Therefore, this review paper examines citizenship acquisition rules while also comparing liberal (free) democracies, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and selected European Union states. Most importantly, it asks three major questions: how long does citizenship take, how hard is it to obtain, and how fair are the processes in practice? Hence, drawing on legal theory, policy reports, and justice, the paper argues that while states have legal rights in regulating membership, prolong, complex, or unnecessary processes risk undermine fairness, equality, and the rule of law.

Citizenship, naturalization, immigration law, fairness, residence requirements, comparative law

1. Bauböck, R. (2010). Studying citizenship constellations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 847–859. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bauböck, R. (2015). Morphing the demos into the right shape: Normative principles for enfranchising resident migrants. European Journal of Political Theory, 14(1), 48–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 SCR 817. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bjorkquist v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 ONSC 7152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Citizenship Act, RSC 1985, c C-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dauvergne, C. (2008). Making people illegal: What globalization means for migration and law. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Howard, M. M. (2009). The politics of citizenship in Europe. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 USC § 316. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Joppke, C. (2007). Transformation of citizenship: Status, rights, identity. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 37–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. OECD. (2011). Naturalisation: A passport for the better integration of immigrants? OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pepa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 SCC 21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shachar, A. (2009). The birthright lottery: Citizenship and global inequality. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
• Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
• Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
• Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
• Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects