The Influence of a STEM-Based Approach on the Students’ Academic Achievement in Genetics
Authors
Lea E. Salon
Doctor of Philosophy in Science Education major in Biology, School of Graduate Studies, MSU- Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines (PH)
Monera A. Salic-Hairulla
Dean, College of Education, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines (PH)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000133
Subject Category: Science 8/Genetics
Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 1528-1533
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-18
Published: 2026-01-17
Abstract
This research explored the impact of a STEM-based approach on the academic achievement of the grade 8 students in genetics. By incorporating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) into genetics teaching, the study aimed at investigating the potential of a STEM-based approach as a teaching strategy in establishing fundamental concepts and deepen understanding of genetics, and improve their academic achievement in a specific period by using the researcher-developed and validated training packet in genetics. A quasi-experimental design was employed, featuring pre-test and post-test evaluations of two groups: one taught through conventional methods and the other with STEM-based techniques. The results revealed a notable enhancement in the academic achievement of students who were taught using the STEM method, demonstrating its effectiveness in promoting critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. These findings highlighted the transformative potential of STEM approaches in reshaping science lessons and equipping students for the challenges of the 21st century.
Keywords
Science 8/Genetics
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Adeyanju, H. I. D. O. W. U. (2023). Improving secondary school students' academic performance in genetics concepts using johnson and johnson model of learning together: An experimental approach. International Journal of Educational Foundations and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Arquero, J. (2021). PEPs in improving academic performance in genetic concepts of grade 11 stem students. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among STEM subjects on students’ learning. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5-6), 23-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for Stem education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. This study highlights the benefits of active learning strategies, which are often a component of STEM-based approaches [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Theories in biology: concerning the nature of theories for developing biology education. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 65-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey- Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yaki, A. A. (2022). Fostering critical thinking skills using integrated stem approach among secondary school biology students. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 06. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yoon, S. Y., et al. (2007). The effects of stem on student achievement. Educational Research Review, 2(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
- Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
- Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
- Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
- Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects