The Influence of a STEM-Based Approach on the Students’ Academic Achievement in Genetics
Authors
Lea E. Salon
Doctor of Philosophy in Science Education major in Biology, School of Graduate Studies, MSU- Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines (PH)
Monera A. Salic-Hairulla
Dean, College of Education, MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, Philippines (PH)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000133
Subject Category: Science 8/Genetics
Volume/Issue: 14/12 | Page No: 1528-1533
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-18
Published: 2026-01-17
Abstract
This research explored the impact of a STEM-based approach on the academic achievement of the grade 8 students in genetics. By incorporating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) into genetics teaching, the study aimed at investigating the potential of a STEM-based approach as a teaching strategy in establishing fundamental concepts and deepen understanding of genetics, and improve their academic achievement in a specific period by using the researcher-developed and validated training packet in genetics. A quasi-experimental design was employed, featuring pre-test and post-test evaluations of two groups: one taught through conventional methods and the other with STEM-based techniques. The results revealed a notable enhancement in the academic achievement of students who were taught using the STEM method, demonstrating its effectiveness in promoting critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration. These findings highlighted the transformative potential of STEM approaches in reshaping science lessons and equipping students for the challenges of the 21st century.
Keywords
Science 8/Genetics
Downloads
References
1. Adeyanju, H. I. D. O. W. U. (2023). Improving secondary school students' academic performance in genetics concepts using johnson and johnson model of learning together: An experimental approach. International Journal of Educational Foundations and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Arquero, J. (2021). PEPs in improving academic performance in genetic concepts of grade 11 stem students. CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among STEM subjects on students’ learning. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5-6), 23-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for Stem education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. This study highlights the benefits of active learning strategies, which are often a component of STEM-based approaches [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Theories in biology: concerning the nature of theories for developing biology education. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 65-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey- Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Yaki, A. A. (2022). Fostering critical thinking skills using integrated stem approach among secondary school biology students. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 06. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Yoon, S. Y., et al. (2007). The effects of stem on student achievement. Educational Research Review, 2(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Students' Perception Towards Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in India
- Strategic Leadership and Cybersecurity Readiness in Digitally Transforming Organisations
- Spatial Distribution of Tourism Infrastructure in Awka, Onitsha and Nnewi Urban Areas of Anambra State.
- Emerging Technologies, Education and Skill Development for A Sustainable Blue Economy in Nigeria.
- Quantum Dot–Based Solar Cells: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects