AI-Driven Socio-Scientific Issues Approach in Green Chemistry Education: Effects on Learners’ Chemical Literacy and Scientific Argumentation Skills

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated considerable potential in enhancing educational practices, while the integration of socio-scientific issues (SSI) in science instruction provides meaningful learning experiences that promote higher-order thinking and societal responsibility. This study examined the effects of an AI-mediated instructional approach integrating Socio-Scientific Issues within Green Chemistry Education (AI-SSI in GCE) on learners’ chemical literacy (CL) and scientific argumentation skills (SAS). A one-group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed involving 31 Grade 11 learners. Data were collected using a Hydrocarbons Chemical Literacy Test (H-CLT), a 30-item multiple-choice instrument aligned with established chemical literacy domains, and a Claim–Evidence–Reasoning–based Argumentative Writing Assessment (CER-AWA). The results revealed statistically significant improvements with large effect sizes in both chemical literacy and scientific argumentation skills following the intervention. Learners demonstrated enhanced abilities to apply chemical knowledge across content, contextual, higher-order, and affective domains, particularly in addressing real-world environmental issues such as plastic pollution. Analysis of scientific argumentation indicated that learners were able to construct complete claims, select relevant evidence, and partially articulate coherent scientific reasoning linking evidence to claims. Additionally, learners exhibited increased awareness of green chemistry principles, environmental sustainability, and the societal implications of chemical decision-making. In conclusion, the AI-SSI in GCE instructional approach effectively fostered cognitive, argumentative, green chemistry awareness, and socio-affective learning outcomes. The findings support the integration of socio-scientific issues and green chemistry concepts into chemistry instruction and highlight the potential of AI as a pedagogical scaffold. However, ethical considerations related to AI use in education may be addressed, and continued optimization and professional dialogue among educators are essential to ensure responsible and learner-centered implementation.

Ai-Driven Instruction, Integrated Socio-Scientific Issue, Green Chemistry Education, Chemical Literacy, Scientific Argumentation Skill, Claim-Evidence-Reason Framework

1. Alindra, A. L., & Ana, A. (2018). Argumentation and reasoning skills in socioscientific issues. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 14(2), 44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v14i2.14356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anggraini, S. D., & Wahyuni, D. (2020). Science Textbook Based on Socio-Scientific Issues (Ssi) For Environmental Pollution to Increase Student Science Literacy in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(1), 12053. Iop Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arbid, El, Samir, Sara, & Tairab, Hassan H. (2020). Science Teachers’ Views About Inclusion of Socio-Scientific Issues in Uae Science Curriculum and Teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 733–748. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bugaje, B. M. (2025). Innovative Teaching Strategies for Future Development of Chemistry Education in Nigeria. Kashere Journal of Education, 7(1), 2008–217. Retrieved from [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/kje/article/view/292997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cannon, A.S.; Anderson, K.R.; Enright, M.C.; Kleinsasser, D.G.; Klotz, A.R.; Neil, N.J.O.; Tucker, L.J. (2023). Green Chemistry Teacher Professional Development in New York State High Schools: A Model for Advancing Green Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ, 100, 2224–2232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Celik, S. (2014). Chemical literacy levels of science and mathematics teacher candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Childs, P. E., Hayes, S., & O’Dwyer, A. (2015). Chemistry and everyday life: relating secondary school chemistry to the current and future lives of students. Rotterdam: Sense. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cigdemoglu, C., & Geban, O. (2015). Improving students’ chemical literacy levels on thermochemical and thermodynamics concepts through a context-based approach. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00007F [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fadly, D., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin, Y. (2022). The effectiveness of a SOIE strategy using socio‑scientific issues on students’ chemical literacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 237–258. Retrieved from https://e‑iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of chemical literacy and its influence in chemistry learning. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Guo, K., Zhong, Y., Li, D., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Effects of chatbot-assisted in-class debates on students’ argumentation skills and task motivation. Computers & Education, 203, 104862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. S. (1991). Achieving chemical literacy. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 392–394. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed068p392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Istiana, R., & Herawati, D. (2019). Student argumentation skill analysis of socioscientific issues in solving environmental problems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jho, H., & Ha, M. (2024). Towards effective argumentation: Design and implementation of a generative AI based evaluation and feedback system. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johnson, J., Macalalag, A.Z. & Dunphy, J. Incorporating socioscientific issues into a STEM education course: exploring teacher use of argumentation in SSI and plans for classroom implementation. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 2, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00026-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jumarito, E., & Nabua, E. (2024). Integrating Indigenous practices in chemistry instructional material for a culturally responsive STEM curriculum. Asia Research Network Journal of Education, 4(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/arnje/article/view/268476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kaldaras, L., Wang, K. D., Nardo, J. E., Price, A., Perkins, K., Wieman, C., & Salehi, S. (2024). Employing technology-enhanced feedback and scaffolding to support the development of deep science understanding using computer simulations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kolong, A. I, Hairulla M. S, & Pitiporntapin S. (2022). Science teachers and students’ perspectives on SSI-based instruction: Basis on the development of SSI-based curricular resources. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 6(1), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/ thabiea.v6i1.18215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kolong, A. I., Salic Hairulla, M., & Pitiporntapin, S. (2025). Enhancing students’ argumentation skills using Socioscientific Issue (SSI) based teaching in the respiratory system topic. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 46(2), Article 460216. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2025.46.2.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Manahan, S. E. (2005). Green chemistry and the ten principles of designing safer chemical processes. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ733792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. In J. Luft, R. Bell & J. Gess Newsome (Eds.), Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting (pp. 121–134). National Science Teachers Association Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mitarlis, M., Azizah, U., & Yonata, B. (2023). The integration of green chemistry principles in basic chemistry learning to support achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 233. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Novitasari, R., Waluyo, J., & Nuriman, N. (2022). Chemistry e module based on Socio Scientific Issues (SSI) for reaction rate material to increase senior high school students’ chemical literacy. Eduvest Journal of Universal Studies, 2(9), 1811–1816. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v2i9.588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pardiana. (2024). Research trends in chemical literacy: A systematic literature review from 2013 to 2022. Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 1(1), 12–18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pitiporntapin S., Yutakom N., & Sadler T. D. (2016). Thai pre-service science teachers' struggles in using Socio-scientific Issues (SSIs’) during practicum. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Quintana, C. (2004). A scaffolding framework for supporting the development of problem-solving expertise in complex domains. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–372. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rahayu, S. (2017). Promoting The 21st Century Scientific Literacy Skills through Innovative Chemistry Instruction. AIP Conference Proceedings, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Rahmawati, Y., Erdawati, E., Ridwan, A., Veronica, N., & Hadiana, D. (2024, February 15). Developing students’ chemical literacy through the integration of dilemma stories into a STEAM project on petroleum topic. Rahmawati | Journal of Technology and Science Education. https://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/2221/822? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Roll, I., Russell, D. M., & Gašević, D. (2018). Learning at scale. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593 018 0170 7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). Chemical literacy: What does this mean to scientists and school teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, 83(10), 1493–1499. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed083p1493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sjöström, J., Yavuzkaya, M., Guerrero, G., & Eilks, I. (2016). Environmentalization of chemistry education: Integrating sustainability and socio-critical perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1355–1365. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sjöström, J., Eilks, I. & Zuin, V.G. Towards Eco-reflexive Science Education. Sci & Educ 25, 321–341 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9818-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Sjöström, J., Yavuzkaya, M., Guerrero, G., & Eilks, I. (2024). Critical chemical literacy as a main goal of chemistry education aiming for climate empowerment and agency. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(10), 4189–4195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok‑Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Vogelzang, J., Admiraal, W. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). Effects of Scrum methodology on students’ critical scientific literacy: The case of Green Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 940–952. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00066C [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Wiyarsi, A., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Nugraheni, A. R. E. (2021a). Promoting students’ scientific habits of mind and chemical literacy using the context of Socio-Scientific issues on the inquiry learning. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.660495 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Yuriev, E., Orgill, M., & Holme, T. A. (2025). Generative AI in chemistry education: Current progress, pedagogical values, and the challenge of rapid evolution. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(9), 3773–3776. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zesen, T., & Osman, K. (2025). Enhancing scientific argumentation skills in the classroom: Strategies for fostering critical thinking in science education. Foro de Educación, 23(1), 270–288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J. B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Predictive Health Monitoring Systems for Electric Vehicle Powertrains Using Edge AI and CAN Bus Data
• Internship Portals: A Systematic Review of Current Platforms and Future Directions
• Towards Better Urban Mobility: A Comprehensive Assessment of Pedestrian Infrastructure in Naval, Biliran Province, Philippines
• An Affordable and Sustainable Efficient Color Sorting System Using Arduino and TCS3200 Sensor
• Financial Stress and Mobility Patterns: Implication for Transportation Policy Among Jeepney Passengers