Success Factors for Implementing AgriTech Solutions in Rural African SMEs: A Comparative Case Study
Authors
Sigale Dadirai Mweha
Student: Special Honours Degree in Procurement & Supply Chain Management, Lupane State University, Zimbabwe (ZW)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150100030
Subject Category: Entrepreneurship, Enterprise, Innovation
Volume/Issue: 15/1 | Page No: 359-374
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-28
Published: 2026-01-28
Abstract
This study examines critical success factors for implementing Agricultural Technology (AgriTech) solutions in rural African Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), focusing on comparative case studies from Zimbabwe, Kenya, Nigeria, Ghana, and Rwanda. The research adopts a comprehensive desk review methodology, analyzing recent literature, policy documents, and implementation reports from 2020-2025. Key findings reveal that successful AgriTech implementation depends on five primary factors: robust stakeholder involvement encompassing government, private sector, academia, and farmer organisations; comprehensive ICT infrastructure development including broadband connectivity and digital literacy programs; sustained capacity building initiatives targeting technical skills and agricultural knowledge; deliberate gender inclusion strategies addressing women farmers' specific needs; and innovative public-private partnership models facilitating resource mobilisation and risk sharing. The study identifies significant barriers including the digital divide affecting 61% of rural African populations, funding constraints limiting technology adoption, and skills gaps impeding effective utilisation. Comparative analysis demonstrates that countries with integrated national digital agriculture strategies, such as Rwanda's Smart Agriculture program and Kenya's DigiFarm platform, achieve higher implementation success rates. The research contributes to understanding how contextual factors influence AgriTech adoption patterns across different African economies. Results indicate that successful implementations require minimum 3:1 return on investment demonstration, localised content development, and phygital service delivery combining digital and physical channels. The study concludes that sustainable AgriTech implementation necessitates holistic approaches addressing technological, social, economic, and institutional dimensions simultaneously. Key policy takeaways include prioritising gender-inclusive public-private partnership models with demonstrated 3:1 ROI benchmarks and establishing national broadband rollouts achieving minimum 85% rural coverage to ensure equitable technology access across diverse agricultural contexts.
Keywords
AgriTech implementation, rural African SMEs, digital agriculture transformation, technology adoption barriers, public-private partnerships, agricultural innovation, sustainable development
Downloads
References
1. African Union. (2023). Continental AgriTech Blueprint for Africa. Smart Africa Alliance Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baumüller, H. (2020). Facilitating agricultural technology adoption among the poor: The role of service delivery through mobile phones. World Development, 89, 245-258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Deichmann, U., Goyal, A., & Mishra, D. (2020). Will digital technologies transform agriculture in developing countries? Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 21-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fanelli, R. M. (2021). Barriers to adopting new technologies within rural small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Social Sciences, 10(11), 430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Gumbi, N., Gumbi, L., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2023). Towards sustainable digital agriculture for smallholder farmers: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(16), 12530. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. He, S. (2025). Digital economy transformation and sustainable development of agricultural enterprises: Supply chain finance innovation and environmental perspectives. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 6(1), 23-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Hove, M. T., Ngwenya, H., & Madhazi, K. (2024). Digital advisory systems in Zimbabwean agriculture: Opportunities and constraints. Agricultural Sciences, 15(11), 1298-1315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kabbiri, R., Dora, M., Kumar, V., & Elepu, G. (2018). Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 253-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Karuppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., & Ali, S. M. (2023). Evaluation of key factors for industry 4.0 technologies adoption in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): An emerging economy context. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 17(2), 321-348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Loo, M. K., Ramachandran, S., & Ahmad, F. (2023). Unleashing the potential: Enhancing technology adoption and innovation for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2267748. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Misaki, E., Apiola, M., Gaiani, S., & Tedre, M. (2018). Challenges facing sub‐Saharan small‐scale farmers in accessing farming information through mobile phones: A systematic literature review. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(6), e12034. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mhlanga, D., & Ndhlovu, E. (2023). Digital technology adoption in the agriculture sector: Challenges and complexities in Africa. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 6951879. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mukwashi, T., Mabika, V., Mokhema, S., & Enokenwa Baa, O. (2024). Youth engagement in agripreneurship in Zimbabwe: Report and recommendations. CGIAR Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Norris, P. (2022). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Quaye, W., Akon-Yamga, G., & Daniels, S. (2024). Technology adoption, competitiveness and new market access among SMEs in Ghana: What are the limiting factors? Innovation and Development, 14(3), 415-438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Smart Africa. (2023). Continental AgriTech Blueprint for Africa. Kigali: Smart Africa Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Smidt, H. J., & Jokonya, O. (2022). Factors affecting digital technology adoption by small-scale farmers in agriculture value chains (AVCs) in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 68-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Smidt, H. J., & Jokonya, O. (2022). Towards a framework to implement a digital agriculture value chain in South Africa for small-scale farmers. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 16, a746. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Srivetbodee, S., & Igel, B. (2021). Digital technology adoption in agriculture: Success factors, obstacles and impact on corporate social responsibility performance in Thailand's smart farming projects. Thammasat Review, 24(2), 78-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Tapo, A. A., Traore, A., Danioko, S., & Tembine, H. (2024). Machine intelligence in Africa: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Tengeh, R. K., Moyo, P. Z., & Ogunlela, G. O. (2023). Role of digitalization in the development of rural entrepreneurship in the Gokwe District of Zimbabwe. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 15(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Thorsteinsdóttir, H., Bell, J. M., & Bandyopadhyay, N. (2021). Cultivating small and medium-sized firms: Entrepreneurship development, gender, and technology in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Ethiopia and Senegal. IDRC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Uwagaba, J., Omotosho, T. D., & George, G. O. (2023). Exploring the barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa's small and medium enterprises and the potential for increased productivity. World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 9(6), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2020). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Wamuyu, P. K., & Maharaj, M. (2022). Factors influencing successful use of mobile technologies to facilitate E-Commerce in small enterprises: The case of Kenya. African Journal of Information Systems, 3(2), 12-34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. World Economic Forum. (2024). Agritech: Shaping agriculture in emerging economies, today and tomorrow. Geneva: World Economic Forum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Aba, M., Erdem, A., Pilatin, A., Barut, A., & Radulescu, M. (2025). Impacts of agritech on sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Carbon Balance and Management, 20, 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. African Development Bank. (2023). Digital agriculture transformation strategy 2023-2027. Abidjan: African Development Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2024). State of food security and nutrition in the world 2024. Rome: FAO Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. International Finance Corporation. (2023). Creating markets in Africa: AgriTech opportunities for smallholder farmers. Washington DC: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2024). Digital agriculture for sustainable development in Africa. Addis Ababa: UNECA Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. World Bank. (2024). Digital agriculture roadmap playbook: Implementation guide for developing countries. Washington DC: World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (ZimStat). (2024). AgriTech adoption survey: Rural SME technology utilization patterns 2023. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zimbabwean Ministry of Agriculture. (2023). National digital agriculture strategy 2023-2030: Framework for technological transformation in smallholder farming. Harare: Government Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Mutsvangwa, T., Chikowo, R., & Nezomba, H. (2024). Mobile-based agricultural extension services in Zimbabwe: Adoption patterns and impact assessment. Zimbabwe Journal of Agricultural Research, 62(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (2023). Gendered technology design: Feminist approaches to agricultural innovation in developing contexts. Gender, Technology and Development, 27(3), 312-335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Talukder, M. S., Chiong, R., Bao, Y., & Malik, B. H. (2024). Technology acceptance model in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-analytical review of contextual factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 445-468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Predictive Health Monitoring Systems for Electric Vehicle Powertrains Using Edge AI and CAN Bus Data
- Internship Portals: A Systematic Review of Current Platforms and Future Directions
- Towards Better Urban Mobility: A Comprehensive Assessment of Pedestrian Infrastructure in Naval, Biliran Province, Philippines
- An Affordable and Sustainable Efficient Color Sorting System Using Arduino and TCS3200 Sensor
- Financial Stress and Mobility Patterns: Implication for Transportation Policy Among Jeepney Passengers