A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-Based Secure Storage Schemes for Medical Information

The exponential growth of digital healthcare data and the increasing need for secure, interoperable medical information systems have positioned blockchain technology as a promising solution for medical data storage and sharing. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of blockchain-based secure storage schemes for medical information, examining 140+ research papers published between 2018-2025. We systematically categorize existing approaches into five primary themes: privacy-preserving storage mechanisms, access control frameworks, interoperability solutions, consensus and trust models, and smart contract implementations. Our analysis reveals that hybrid architectures combining on-chain metadata with off-chain encrypted storage (particularly using IPFS and cloud services) have emerged as the dominant paradigm. Key cryptographic techniques include attribute-based encryption (ABE), homomorphic encryption, and differential privacy for protecting sensitive medical data. We identify permissioned blockchain platforms, especially Hyperledger Fabric and Ethereum-based private networks, as preferred choices for healthcare consortiums. Major challenges include scalability limitations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA, GDPR), interoperability with legacy systems, and governance frameworks. Recent advancements focus on post-quantum cryptography integration, AI-enabled healthcare blockchains, and patient-centric digital twin implementations. This survey concludes with a discussion of future research directions, including quantum-resistant security schemes, cross-chain interoperability, and standardization efforts for blockchain-based healthcare systems.

Blockchain, Medical Information Security, Electronic Health Records, Healthcare Privacy, Secure Storage, Cryptographic Access Control

1. [Amofa et al., 2024] S. Amofa et al., “Blockchain-secure patient Digital Twin in healthcare using smart contracts,” PLOS ONE, 2024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. [Azaria et al., 2016] A. Azaria, A. Ekblaw, T. Vieira, and A. Lippman, “MedRec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management,” in 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), 2016, pp. 25-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. [Chenthara et al., 2020] S. Chenthara, K. Ahmed, H. Wang, F. Whittaker, and Z. Chen, “Healthchain: A novel framework on privacy preservation of electronic health records using blockchain technology,” PLOS ONE, 2020. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0243043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. [Dubovitskaya et al., 2020] A. Dubovitskaya et al., “ACTION‑EHR: Patient‑centric blockchain‑based electronic health record data management for cancer care,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020. doi: 10.2196/13598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. [Healthcare Security Report, 2024] “2024 Healthcare Data Breach Report,” Healthcare IT Security, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. [He et al., 2025] H. He et al., “A Post-Quantum Blockchain and Autonomous AI-Enabled Scheme for Secure Healthcare Information Exchange,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2025. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3579722 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. [Liu et al., 2018] J. Liu, X. Li, L. Ye, H. Zhang, X. Du, and M. Guizani, “BPDS: A blockchain based privacy-preserving data sharing for electronic medical records,” arXiv: Cryptography and Security, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. [Shah et al., 2024] S. Shah et al., “Utilizing Blockchain Technology for Healthcare and Biomedical Research: A Review,” Cureus, 2024. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. [Shahnaz et al., 2019] A. Shahnaz, U. Qamar, and A. Khalid, “Using blockchain for electronic health records,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 147782-147795, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. [Tith et al., 2020] D. Tith et al., “Application of blockchain to maintaining patient records in electronic health record for enhanced privacy, scalability, and availability,” Healthcare Informatics Research, vol. 26, no. 1, 2020. doi: 10.4258/HIR.2020.26.1.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. [Wu et al., 2024] G. Wu et al., “Electronic Health Records Sharing Based on Consortium Blockchain,” Journal of Medical Systems, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02120-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. [Yaqub et al., 2025] N. Yaqub et al., “Blockchain enabled policy-based access control mechanism to restrict unauthorized access to electronic health records,” PeerJ Computer Science, 2025. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. [Zhang & Schmidt, 2017] P. Zhang and M. Schmidt, “PatientChain: Patient-centered Healthcare Data Management in Mobile IoT via Blockchain,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03493, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. [Zhang et al., 2021] R. Zhang, R. Xue, and L. Liu, “Security and Privacy for Healthcare Blockchains,” arXiv: Cryptography and Security, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. [Zhou et al., 2024] X. Zhou et al., “Retrieval Integrity Verification and Multi-System Data Interoperability Mechanism of a Blockchain Oracle for Smart Healthcare with IoT Integration,” Sensors, 2024. doi: 10.3390/s24237487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. [Yaqub et al., 2025] Nadeem Yaqub et al., “Blockchain enabled policy-based access control mechanism to restrict unauthorized access to electronic health records” PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Jan 23;11:e2647. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Predictive Health Monitoring Systems for Electric Vehicle Powertrains Using Edge AI and CAN Bus Data
• Internship Portals: A Systematic Review of Current Platforms and Future Directions
• Towards Better Urban Mobility: A Comprehensive Assessment of Pedestrian Infrastructure in Naval, Biliran Province, Philippines
• An Affordable and Sustainable Efficient Color Sorting System Using Arduino and TCS3200 Sensor
• Financial Stress and Mobility Patterns: Implication for Transportation Policy Among Jeepney Passengers