Climate Change and International Law: How Canada and the United States Respond Differently (2025)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Climate change happened to be one of the most serious global challenges of modern times, with legal, political, and social consequences. However, international law has been used as a tool to guide how states respond to climate risks, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and protect vulnerable populations. This review paper examines how Canada and the United States respond to climate change within the framework of international law as of 2025. Although both countries are economically advanced and historically high emitters of greenhouse gases, their legal approaches to climate governance vary considerably. Canada remains actively engaged in international climate agreements and incorporates these commitments into domestic legislation. On the contrary, the United States has adopted a reserved approach, including withdrawal from major international climate instruments and reduced reliance on international legal commitment. By reviewing legal instruments, policies, and scholarly literature, this paper highlights how differences in policy objectives and legal interpretation shape national climate responses. The paper concludes that these contrasting approaches have important implications for the effectiveness of international climate law and global climate cooperation.
Downloads
References
Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A new hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319.
Boyle, A. (2022). Climate change, human rights, and international law. Cambridge University Press.
Doelle, M. (2021). Canada’s climate accountability framework. Journal of Environmental Law, 33(3), 505–528.
Government of Canada. (2023). 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan.
Government of Canada. (2023). Canada’s nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement. Environment and Climate Change Canada.
Harrison, K. (2020). Canada and climate change: Policy evolution and political constraints. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 621–639.
Jaffe, J. (2021). Climate policy, executive power, and administrative law in the United States. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 45(2), 1–38.
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 570–575.
Paris Agreement. (2015). United Nations Treaty Series.
Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 37–67.
Rajamani, L. (2018). Innovation and experimentation in the international climate change regime. Climate Policy, 18(1), 1–15.
Reference re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2021 SCC 11.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Emissions gap report.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1992).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.