The Effect of the Use of Web-Based Interactive Multimedia on Student Learning Outcomes in Pancasila Education Learning

This study aims to analyze the effect of web-based interactive multimedia on students’ learning outcomes in Pancasila Education at SMP Negeri 4 Bungbulang. The research was motivated by students’ low conceptual understanding due to the dominant use of conventional lecture methods. A quantitative approach with a One-Group Pretest–Posttest design was employed. Data were collected through learning outcome tests, questionnaires, and observations, and analyzed using t-tests and effect size calculations. The results show a significant improvement in learning outcomes, with gain scores of 36.12 and 40.24 and a very large effect size (d > 5.4). The use of multimedia also produced more homogeneous scores and increased the average achievement above the minimum mastery criteria (KKM), rising from 40–46 to 76–87. These findings align with multimedia learning theory, emphasizing the contribution of text, audio, and visual elements to conceptual understanding. The study concludes that web-based interactive multimedia is effective in improving learning outcomes and student engagement, and is recommended for integration into Pancasila Education and other value-based subjects.

interactive multimedia, learning outcomes, Pancasila Education, web-based learning, quantitative experiment.

1. AECT (Association for Educational Communications and Technology). (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Azwar, S. (2012). Reliability and Validity. Yogyakarta: Student Library. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baker, R. S. J. d., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice (hlm. 61–75). New York: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Canva. (2024). Online Design Platform. Accessed from https://www.canva.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dalgarno, B., Gregory, S., Reiners, T., & Knox, V. (2022). Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Research from 2016 to 2021. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7481 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Darmawan, D. (2016). Quantitative research methods (Revised edition). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Graham, C. R. (2019). Current Research in Blended Learning. Dalam M. G. Moore & W. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (4th ed., pp. 173–188). New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2019). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2022). Multimedia and Interactivity: A Meta-Analysis.Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 537–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09612-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2018). Educational Technology: A Definition with Commentary. Routledge.Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Prensky, M. (2018). Education to better their world: Unleashing the power of 21st-century kids. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ratnaningsih, S. (2019). The effect of problem-solving-based interactive multimedia on students' critical thinking skills on the concept of equilibrium and rotational dynamics (Thesis, Department of Physics, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta). Retrieved from institutional repository. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Reigeluth, C. M., & An, Y. J. (2020). Instructional Design Theories and Models: The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sari, R., & Rahman, H. (2021). "The Influence of Interactive Multimedia in Pancasila Education Learning." Journal of Character Education, 9(1), 102-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sapriya. (2011). Social Studies Education: Concepts and Learning (Revised Edition). PT Remaja Rosdakarya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Seels, B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of the Field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sudjana, N. (2009). Assessment of the results of the teaching and learning process. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Sugihartono. (2007). Educational psychology. UNY Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2020). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sutopo, A. H. (2014). Information and communication technology in education. Graha Ilmu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang, Q., Li, H., & Chen, W. (2019). The influence of interactive multimedia on student engagement: A study of classroom technology integration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 56-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wang, S., Li, J., & Chen, C. (2019). "Effects of Multimedia on Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education." Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 245-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Predictive Health Monitoring Systems for Electric Vehicle Powertrains Using Edge AI and CAN Bus Data
• Internship Portals: A Systematic Review of Current Platforms and Future Directions
• Towards Better Urban Mobility: A Comprehensive Assessment of Pedestrian Infrastructure in Naval, Biliran Province, Philippines
• An Affordable and Sustainable Efficient Color Sorting System Using Arduino and TCS3200 Sensor
• Financial Stress and Mobility Patterns: Implication for Transportation Policy Among Jeepney Passengers