Artificial Intelligence, Regulatory Frameworks, And Human Rights: Rethinking Conflict Resolution in The Digital Era in West Pokot County, Kenya
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative tool in governance, peace building, and social development, particularly in conflict-prone regions such as West Pokot County, Kenya, where intercommunal clashes, cattle rustling, and cross-border disputes persist. This study investigates the integration of AI into conflict resolution while ensuring the protection of human rights under Kenya’s regulatory frameworks. The objectives were to examine the opportunities and risks associated with AI in peace building, evaluate the adequacy of existing legal and ethical safeguards, and propose models that balance technological innovation with community-driven conflict resolution strategies. A mixed-methods design was employed, engaging 60 purposively selected respondents, including government officials, community leaders, human rights activists, members of peace committees, and youth representatives. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and document reviews of policy frameworks and human rights reports.
To strengthen the robustness of findings, both quantitative statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, Chi-square tests, and factor analysis) and qualitative thematic coding were employed. Results indicate that AI applications particularly predictive analytics, mobile-based early warning systems, digital mediation platforms, and resource-mapping tools hold significant potential to enhance conflict anticipation, coordination, and resolution. However, gaps in regulatory enforcement, algorithmic bias, digital exclusion of women and elderly populations, and infrastructural limitations constrain effective implementation. The study highlights a critical knowledge gap between global AI innovations and localized conflict management practices in marginalized regions.
Sustainable peace in West Pokot requires a hybrid governance model that integrates AI-driven tools with culturally grounded conflict resolution mechanisms, reinforced by robust human rights protections and inclusive leadership. Recommendations include strengthening Kenya’s AI-specific legal and ethical frameworks, investing in community-focused digital literacy, piloting scalable AI interventions, and establishing safeguards to prevent misuse in fragile contexts. By aligning technological innovation with community needs and ethical oversight, AI can become a complementary mechanism for building sustainable peace and resilience in conflict-affected areas.
Downloads
References
Adebayo, T. (2020). Predictive analytics and conflict prevention in Africa. African Security Review, 29(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2020.1820567
Adom, D., Hussein, E. K., & Agyem, J. A. (2020). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research, 7(1), 438–441.
African Union Commission. (2022). Continental strategy on artificial intelligence for Africa. Addis Ababa: African Union.
Bietti, E. (2020). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09536-2
Bryson, J. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 745–757.
Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2016). There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature, 538(7625), 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a
Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible artificial intelligence: How to develop and use AI in a responsible way. Springer.
European Commission. (2021). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(1), 1–13.
Gwagwa, A., Kazim, E., Hilliard, A., Siminyu, K., & Smith, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in Africa’s public sector: Opportunities, challenges and ethical implications. Data & Policy, 3(e12).
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). (2023). Statistical abstract 2023. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR). (2023). Annual report on peace and security in Kenya. Nairobi: KNCHR.
Kihara, M. (2022). The role of data protection laws in Kenya’s digital governance. African Journal of Law and Technology, 5(2), 45–60.
Kshetri, N. (2021). Artificial intelligence in developing countries. Springer.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
Mabunda, P., & Okafor, N. (2023). AI and peace: Opportunities for Africa’s digital transformation. Journal of Peace Innovation, 4(1), 22–37.
Mkutu, K. (2019). Pastoralist conflict and governance in Kenya. Routledge.
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Technology in Society, 75, 102238.
Mwangi, L. (2022). AI adoption and inclusive governance in Kenya. Journal of African Digital Policy, 2(1), 55–72.
Njoroge, S., Omolo, D., & Kariuki, P. (2023). Digital inclusion and peacebuilding in Kenya’s ASAL counties. East African Social Science Review, 9(2), 77–98.
Omar, H., & Abdi, A. (2022). AI governance in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and pathways. Technology in Society, 70, 102001.
Rahwan, I. (2018). Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 5–14.
Small Arms Survey. (2022). Pastoralist conflicts and armed violence in East Africa. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.
Tadokoro, M. (2018). Japan’s human security approach in peacebuilding. Asian Perspective, 42(1), 5–27.
Tegmark, M. (2019). AI and future ethics: Balancing innovation with human values. AI & Society, 34(3), 553–561.
UNDP. (2022). Digital technologies and conflict prevention: Policy insights. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.
UN Global Pulse. (2021). Harnessing big data for peace and humanitarian action. United Nations.
United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). (2022). Artificial intelligence and peacebuilding: Emerging policy frontiers. New York: United Nations.
Weidinger, L., Mellor, J., & Gabriel, I. (2022). Ethical and social risks of artificial intelligence systems. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 9(1), 58–85
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.