Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review

Drone-based phenotyping using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has emerged as a revolutionary approach for high-throughput, precise, and scalable measurement of plant traits critical to crop improvement. This technology integrates advanced imaging sensors—including RGB, multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal cameras—with sophisticated image processing and artificial intelligence algorithms to non-destructively capture key phenotypic data such as plant height, biomass, canopy temperature, maturity timing, and disease symptoms under natural field conditions. Compared with traditional manual phenotyping and satellite-based remote sensing, UAV phenotyping offers superior spatial and temporal resolution, enabling dynamic monitoring of complex traits such as drought tolerance and disease resistance. Applications span early stress detection, quantitative trait assessment, yield prediction, and accelerating breeding cycles by facilitating objective, rapid selection of superior genotypes across multiple crop species. Despite its transformative potential, challenges remain in standardizing protocols, managing large-scale complex datasets, integrating phenotypic with genomic and environmental data, and providing training resources for widespread adoption. Ongoing advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, open-source tools, and capacity building are poised to cement drone-based phenotyping as a cornerstone technology for sustainable, climate-resilient crop breeding and global food security.

UAV-based phenotyping, High-throughput phenotyping, Drone remote sensing, Precision agriculture

1. AirBorn Insight. (n.d.). Drone-based phenotyping for agriculture field trials. https://airborninsight.com.au/drone-based-phenotyping/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alahmad, S., et al. (2025). Combining UAV phenotyping and machine learning to predict root traits in field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S., & Cairns, J. E. (2022). What can aerial phenotyping do and bring to us (breeders)? Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 993805. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.993805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhandari, M., Chang, A., Jung, J., Ibrahim, A. M. H., Rudd, J. C., Baker, S., ... & Landivar, J. (2023). Unmanned aerial system-based high-throughput phenotyping for plant breeding. Plant Phenotyping Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20058 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Costa, J. M., Ortuño, M. F.,Chaves, M. M., & Pereira, L. S. (2019). Opportunities and limitations of crop phenotyping in controlled environments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Excellence in Breeding. (2019). Standard operating procedures for UAV phenotyping. University of Barcelona, Faculty of Biology. https://excellenceinbreeding.org/toolbox/tools/standard-operating-procedures-uav-phenotyping [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Feng, L., et al. (2021). A comprehensive review on recent applications of UAVs in high-throughput plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 185, 106132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106132 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ge, H., et al. (2025). Enhancing yield prediction in maize breeding using UAV-derived RGB imagery and machine learning. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1511871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Guo, W., et al. (2021). UAS-based plant phenotyping for research and breeding applications: A review. Sensors, 21(11), 3827. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113827 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. ICRISAT. (2020). Applications of UAVs: Image-based plant phenotyping. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. https://oar.icrisat.org/12492/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jangra, S., et al. (2021). High-throughput phenotyping: A platform to accelerate crop improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 651976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.651976 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kefauver, S. C., Araus, J. L., & Buchaillot, M. L. (2019). Basic standard operating procedures for UAV phenotyping. University of Barcelona, Faculty of Biology. Retrieved October 2025, from https://excellenceinbreeding.org/toolbox/tools/standard-operating-procedures-uav-phenotyping [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kumar, C. S., Singh, P., & Singh, M. (2024). The impact of phenotyping and genotyping on crop improvement. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 8(8), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i8f.1771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Leher. (2025). Drone sensors in modern agriculture techniques. Leher Blog. Retrieved October 2025, from https://www.leher.ag/blog/drone-sensors-modern-agriculture [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Liu, Q., Zhang, T., Zhao, R., & Jia, W. (2025). A computational framework for modeling and predicting maize senescence: Integrating UAV phenotyping, logistic growth, and genomics. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 237, 110470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Marcone, C., Lopez, J., & Yanguas, G. (2024). Cost-effective and scalable drone phenotyping technologies for large-scale crop improvement. Agricultural Systems, 202, 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Marsh, J. I., et al. (2021). Crop breeding for a changing climate: Integrating phenomics and genomics for climate resilience. Crop Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Marsh, J. I., Hu, H., Gill, M., Batley, J., & Edwards, D. (2021). Crop breeding for a changing climate: Integrating phenomics and genomics with bioinformatics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134(6), 1677-1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03820-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Parker, T., Celebioglu, B., Watson, M., & Gepts, P. (2022). Drone methods and educational resources for plant science and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Parker, T., Celebioglu, B., Watson, M., & Gepts, P. (2022). Drone methods and educational resources for plant science and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630162/full [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Patil, S. M., Choudhary, S., Kholova, J., Chandramouli, M., & Jagarlapudi, A. (2024). Applications of UAVs: Image-Based Plant Phenotyping. In Digital Agriculture (pp. 341-367). Springer Cham. https://oar.icrisat.org/12492/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Poland, J., & Nelson, R. (2025). Drone methods and educational resources for plant science and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16, 1630162. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630162 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pun Magar, L., et al. (2025). Plant height measurement using UAV-based aerial RGB and LiDAR sensors at multiple soybean growth stages. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1488760 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sangjan, W., Pandey, P., Best, N. B., & Washburn, J. D. (2025). MatchPlant: An open-source pipeline for UAV-based single-plant detection and geospatial trait extraction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.12295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sankaran, S., et al. (2019). Unmanned aerial system and satellite-based high-resolution phenotyping: Current status and future trends. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shakoor, N., Lee, S., & Mockler, T. C. (2024). Drone-based imaging sensors, techniques, and applications in plant phenotyping for crop breeding: A comprehensive review. The Plant Phenome Journal, 7(1), e20100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppj2.20100 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shakshi, et al. (2024). Integrating genomics and phenomics in agricultural breeding: A comprehensive review. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 17(4), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sinha, D., et al. (2023). Integrated genomic selection for accelerating breeding and supporting precision agriculture. Plants, People, Planet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sun, S., Li, C., Paterson, A. H., & Jiang, Y. (2021). A comprehensive review on recent applications of unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing with various sensors for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 182, 106033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Sweet, D. D., et al. (2022). Opportunities and challenges in phenotyping row crops using UAVs. Journal of Field Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tripicchio, P., Satler, M., Dabisias, G., Ruffaldi, E., & Avizzano, C. A. (2022). Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 191, 106576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Volpato, L., Wright, E. M., Gomez, F. E., & Kelly, J. D. (2024). Drone-based digital phenotyping to evaluate relative maturity, stand count, and plant height in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Phenomics, 6, 0278. https://doi.org/10.34133/plantphenomics.0278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Wang, B., et al. (2024). IHUP: An integrated high-throughput universal phenotyping software platform. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 236, 107980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.107980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yang, W., et al. (2022). What can aerial phenotyping do and bring to us (breeders)? Frontiers in Plant Science. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9804475/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zhang, W., et al. (2003). Progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne laser scanning data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(4), 872-882. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.810682 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zhang, X., et al. (2025). CNN-LSTM-Attention (CLA) model for UAV multispectral imagery to estimate full-period rice leaf area index. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rsxxxxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhang, X., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Wang, F. (2024). High-throughput phenotyping in soybean breeding using RGB image vegetation indices based on drone. Scientific Reports, 14, 83807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83807-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)
• GIS-Based Spatial Analysis of River Setback Policy Violations and Flood Vulnerability Along River Ngadda in Maiduguri, Nigeria