Lived Experiences of Female Prisoners in Samar

Although prison life is widely studied, the experiences of women in Philippine provincial facilities remain under-researched. This qualitative case study explored the lived experiences of 11 pre-trial female detainees in two provincial jails in Samar to identify gender-specific challenges within the correctional system. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed thematically, revealing five primary themes: life before incarceration, emotional responses, prisoners’ needs, challenges in prison life, and coping mechanisms. Results indicate that while detainees demonstrate resilience and solidarity, they endure significant hardships, including prolonged legal delays, family separation, and inadequate institutional support. Grounded in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Rogers’ humanistic theory, the analysis demonstrates how unmet psychological and physical needs undermine inmate dignity. The study concludes that the intersection of gender and justice in provincial contexts necessitates urgent gender-responsive policies. Significant recommendations include improving access to mental health services, livelihood programs, and family support systems to facilitate successful rehabilitation and reintegration.

Female inmates; Gender-responsive justice; Incarcerated women; Provincial jails; Psychosocial survival

1. Agbaria, Q., & Abu-Mokh, A. (2025). The psychological consequences of incarceration [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. among women: A longitudinal study on the impact of COVID-19 visitation bans. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 25(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arditti, J. A., & Few, A. L. (2008). Maternal distress and women’s reentry into family and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. community life. Family Process, 47(3), 303–321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. ASEAN. (2025). ASEAN declaration on the gender-responsive implementation of the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bangkok rules: Regional framework for 2025–2030. ASEAN Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baidawi, S., Broidy, L., & Payne, J. (2024). Correctional rehabilitation programs for women: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. A systematic review. Journal of Criminology, 57(1), 34–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP). (2022). Annual administrative and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. operations report 2022. Department of the Interior and Local Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP). (2023). BJMP annual report 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of the Interior and Local Government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Comfort, M. (2008). Doing time together: Love and family in the shadow of the prison. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Crewe, B. (2009). The prisoner society: Power, adaptation, and social life in an English [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. prison. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fair, H., & Walmsley, R. (2022). World female imprisonment list (5th ed.). Institute for [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Crime & Justice Policy Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Giacomello, C. (2020). Women, drug policies, and incarceration in Southeast Asia. In The [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Emerald handbook of feminism, criminology and social change (pp. 311–328). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Haney, C. (2001). The psychological impact of incarceration: Implications for post-prison [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. adjustment. Prison Journal, 81(3), 33–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Open, aware, and active: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 141–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Liebling, A., & Maruna, S. (2013). The effects of imprisonment. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Liem, M., & Kunst, M. (2013). Is there a recognizable post-incarceration syndrome among [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. released “lifers”? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(3-4), 333–337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. American [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Psychological Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Masekoameng, N. S., Parry, Y. K., & Fourie, W. (2023). The motherhood experiences of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. women incarcerated in correctional centres in Gauteng, South Africa: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE, 18(3), e0282341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Narag, R. (2020). Slow justice and prolonged pre-trial detention in the Philippines. Asian [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Journal of Criminology, 15(2), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Penal Reform International. (2021). Global prison trends 2021. https://www.penalreform.org/global-prison-trends-2021/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Santos, A. B. (2022). Effectiveness of the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. livelihood program in Valenzuela City Jail. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 6(1), 45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum-security prison. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. UN Women. (2021). The Bangkok rules: Guidance on women in the criminal justice system. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2021/06/the-bangkok-rules [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020a). Focus on the Bangkok rules: A gender-sensitive approach to prison management. UNODC Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020b). Global study on women [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. deprived of liberty: Pathways to prison and imprisonment conditions. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2025). Global report on women in the criminal justice system: Trends and challenges in the post-pandemic era. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Van Ginneken, E. F. J. C. (2016). Making sense of life in prison: A longitudinal study of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. prisoners. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Western, B. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2012). Predicting the prison misconducts [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. of women offenders: The importance of gender-responsive needs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 28(1), 122–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)