Impact of Industrial Activities on the Degradation of Soil pollution and Functional Ecosystem of Duwani Wetland a Case Study of Aluminium Factory in Teteliya Village, Kamrup Metropolitan District of Assam, India

Wetlands are the most important natural function of the terrestrial surface of the earth. It is a habitat of many aquatic plants and animals. On the other hand in industrialization is the processes of human development . In India the industrial activities have been rapidly increasing and urbanization process has also been fastest growing. Due to the industrial activities negative impacts on nature. In the study area the Duwani wetland is the most valuable and productive wetland of Assam. Because this natural wetland is connected with the mighty Brahmaputra river. The industrial activities on the bank of this wetland have mostly polluted the soil function. In this research works soil quality of the wetland is tasted on laboratory. Various parameters have taken for analysis. Some of the parameters like Potential of Hydrogen (pH),  Electrical Conductivity (EC), Organic Carbon (OC), Nitrogen ( N), Potassium ( K), Phosphorus (P), Chloride (Cl ) etc. The soil samples are measuring both the WHO and USPH standard. From this analysis have found the amount of soil pollution and functional ecosystem of Duwani wetlands

Ecosystem, wetlands, Industrialization, Soil pollution, environment

1. Paramasivam, C. R., & Anbazhagan, S. (2020). Soil fertility analysis in and around magnesite mines, Salem, India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 4(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1608407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. D.R. Deka (2011), Geo- ecological status and economic potentials of wetlands in Dimoria region of Assam, India [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allen, B.L., Mallarino, A.P., Klatt, J.G., Baker, J.L., Camara, M., 2006. Soil and surface runoff phosphorus relationships for five typical USA midwest soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Almario, J., Muller, D., Defago, G., Moenne-Loccoz, Y., 2014. Rhizosphere ecology and phytoprotection in soils naturally suppressive to Thielaviopsis black root rot of tobacco. Environmental Microbiology 16, 1949–1960. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Andrews, S.S., Carroll, C.R., 2001. Designing a soil quality assessment tool for sustainable agroecosystem management. Ecological Applications 11, 1573–1585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Andrews, S.S., Karlen, D.L., Cambardella, C.A., 2004. The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1945–1962. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Antoni, V., Saby, N.P.A., Jolivet, C., Toutain, B., Thorette, J., Arrouays, D., 2007. The French Information System on Soils: a decision support system for soil inventory, monitoring and management. Environmental Informatics and Systems Research 225–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Armenise, E., Redmile-Gordon, M.A., Stellacci, A.M., Ciccarese, A., Rubino, P., 2013. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil and Tillage Research 130, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arrouays, D., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., Biodineau, G., Saby, N., Grolleau, E., 2002. Une initiative nouvelle en France: la mise en place d'un réseau multi-institutionel de mesure de la qualité des sols (RMQS). Comptes Rendues de l'Académie d' Agriculture de France 88, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Arrouays, D., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L., Ratié, C., Saby, N., Grolleau, E., 2003. Le réseau de mesures de la Qualité des Sols (RMQS) de France. Étude et Gestion des Sols 10, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Arshad, M.A., Martin, S., 2002. Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 88, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Askari, M.S., Holden, N.M., 2015. Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil and Tillage Research 150, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ball, B.C., Batey, T., Munkholm, L.J., 2007. Field assessment of soil structural quality - a development of the Peerlkamp test. Soil Use & Management 23, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Paramasivam, C. R., & Anbazhagan, S. (2020). Soil fertility analysis in and around magnesite mines, Salem, India. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 4(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1608407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)