00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Grit, Emotional Intelligence, and Teacher Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Framework for Enhancing Professional Well-Being and Sustainability

Authors

Surakshitha

III B.Sc Psychology, Rathinam College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu (IN)

Eshwar

Assistant Professor Rathinam College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/

Subject Category: psychology

Volume/Issue: 15/2 | Page No: 882-886

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-19

Published: 2026-03-19

Abstract

Teacher job satisfaction is a critical determinant of professional commitment, instructional quality, and longterm retention in the teaching profession. In light of increasing concerns about burnout and attrition, there is a growing need to explore internal psychological resources that promote resilience and well-being among teachers. This conceptual paper integrates two significant psychological constructs—grit and emotional intelligence—to examine their potential influence on teacher job satisfaction. Drawing on contemporary educational psychology literature, the manuscript proposes a conceptual framework illustrating the direct and interactive relationships among grit, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction, while also acknowledging the role of organizational factors. The paper concludes with implications for teacher education, professional development, and future empirical validation through quantitative research designs.

Keywords

grit, emotional intelligence, teacher job satisfaction, resilience, teacher well-being, educational psychology

Downloads

References

1. Brackett, M. A., Palomera, R., Mojsa‐Kaja, J., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2010). Emotion‐regulation ability, burnout, and job satisfaction among British secondary‐school teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 406– 417. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social–emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.92.6.1087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self‐evaluations traits—self‐esteem, generalized selfefficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self‐efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self‐efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131715856 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Taris, T. W., & Schreurs, P. J. G. (2009). Well-being and organizational performance: An organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis. Work & Stress, 23(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370903072555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.