Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Employee Productivity in the Manufacturing Sector in Malawi: A Case of Candlex Limited

Leadership is the process of influencing the activities of an individual or a group towards attaining a specific set of goals. This influence can either be negative or positive depending on the leadership style adopted. This study established the relationship between leadership styles and employee productivity in the manufacturing sector in Malawi, Southern Africa. It used a mixed method approach that included data collected from questionnaires and interviews along with statistical testing using the Spearman’s rank correlation in SPSS. Results showed that in the Malawian manufacturing sector, based on employee perceptions, the most prevalent leadership style was the autocratic leadership style and the least prevalent was the Laissez-Faire leadership style. The democratic leadership was considered the most effective style for enhancing productivity, however, only the persuasive leadership style had a positive significant correlation with employee productivity (r_s = 0.554, p < 0.01). It is recommended that organisations should formulate leadership policies that mix leadership styles such as democratic and persuasive leadership to enhance employee productivity. 

Leadership Styles, Employee Productivity, Manufacturing Sector, Mixed Methods, Malawi, Southern Africa

1. Adiguzel, Z. & Cakir, M. (2021). Examining the effects of moral leadership on employees in the manufacturing sector. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(77), 168-187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amiscua, M., Fernandez, M., Madanging, J. & Querido, J. (2018). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Employees' Productivity: A Qualitative Study of Employees' Experiences of Motivation in the Workplace. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/requests/attachment/52212945 (Accessed 29/12/18). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ansari, M.A. (1990). Leader behavior and organizational effectiveness: The moderating effect of organizational climate. Organizational research in Indian perspective, 9-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auren, U. (2018). Techniques of Leadership. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Babbie, E. & Rubin, A. (1989). Research Methods for Social Work. California: Wadsworth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. The Free Press google schola, 2, 173-184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bass, B.M. and Avolio, B.J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J., Jung, D.I. & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Beyene, K.T., Shi, C.S. & Wu, W.W. (2016). Linking culture, organizational learning orientation and product innovation performance: The case of Ethiopian manufacturing firms. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(1), 88-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bhargavi, S. & Yaseen, A. (2016). Leadership styles and organizational performance. Strategic Management Quarterly, 4(1), 87-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (2019). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chemers, M.M. (1997). An Integrative Theory of Leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cole, G.A. (2005). Organizational Behavior. Nottingham: TJ International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297– 334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Desgourdes, C., Hasnaoui, J., Umar, M. & Feliu, J.G. (2024). Decoding laissez-faire leadership: an indepth study on its influence over employee autonomy and well-being at work. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(2), 1047-1065. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Duckett, H. & Macfarlane, E. (2003). Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in retailing. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(6), 309-317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Edward, F.T. (2007). The discourse of leadership and the practice of administration. Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 2(1), 32-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fiedler, F.E. (1972). How do you make leaders more effective? New answers to an old puzzle. Organizational Dynamics, 1(2), 3-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fleishman, E.A. (1957). A leader behavior description for industry. Leader behavior: Its description and measurement, 103, 10-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gastil, J. (1994). A meta-analytic review of the productivity and satisfaction of democratic and autocratic leadership. Small Group Research, 25(3), 384-410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gordon, G. E., & Rosen, N. (1981). Critical factors in leadership succession. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(2), 227-254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Government of Malawi (2020). Malawi Vision 2063: An inclusively wealthy and self-reliant nation. National Planning Commission, Lilongwe, Malawi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Griffin, M. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (1997). Modeling organizational processes across hierarchical levels: climate, leadership, and group process in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 18(6), 731-744. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Harms, P.D., Wood, D., Landay, K., Lester, P.B. & Lester, G.V. (2018). Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 105-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hassan, A.M., Dellow, D.A. & Jackson, R.J. (2009). The AACC leadership competencies: Parallel views from the top. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 34(1-2), 180-198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hollander, E.P. & Julian, J.W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological bulletin, 71(5), 387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hurd, J.A. (2020). Leadership Styles of Head NASCAR Executives: A Historical Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, East Tennessee State University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Iman, N. & Lestari, W. (2019). The effect of leadership on job satisfaction, work motivation and performance of employees: Studies in AMIK Yapennas Kendari. African Journal of Business Management, 13(14), 465-473. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ivancevich, J.M., Szilagyi, A.D. & Wallace, M.J. (1977). Organisational Behaviour and Performance. Goodyear Publishing Company Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jaafar, S.B., Zambi, N.M. and Fathil, N.F. (2021). Leadership style: Is it autocratic, democratic or laissezfaire. ASEAN Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jony, M.T.I., Alam, M.J., Amin, M.R. & Jahangir, M. (2019). The impact of autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire leadership styles on the success of the organization: A study on the different popular restaurants of Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies, 1(6), 2838. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Khan, M.I., Fiaz, M. and Taous, M., 2023. An Empirical Analysis of the Nexus between Leadership Styles and Employees’ Performance. Open Access Organization and Management Review, 1(2), 38-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Klath, E., Maxwell, A., & Bob, L. (2017). Human Resource Management. Ohio: Merit Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kolb, D.A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Lincoln, Y.S., Lynham, S.A. & Guba, E.G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4(2), 97-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. Haper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, A.G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative & qualitative apporaches (Vol. 2, No. 2). Nairobi: Acts press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Noor, S. (2021), February. What is Covid New Normal and its Leadership Requirements?. In SJIM International Conference (Vol. 109). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Northouse, P.G. (1999). Leadership: Theory and practice (p. xxiii). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ogbonna, E. & Harris, L.C. (2021). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 766–788. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Oussible, N. and Tinaztepe, C.I.H.A.N. (2022). The Effect of Democratic Leadership Style on Organizational Productivity by the mediating role of Employee performance in Turkey. International Journal of Recent Research in Commerce Economics and Management, 9(1), 6-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Peker, S., İnandı, Y. & Gılıç, F. (2018). The relationship between leadership styles (autocratic and democratic) of school administrators and the mobbing teachers suffer. European Journal of Contemporary Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Robbins, S., Waters-Marsh, T., Cacioppe, R., Millet, B. (1994). Organisational Behaviour - Concepts, Controversies, and Applications. Prentice Hall Limited. Australia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rue, L. & Byars, L. (2017). Management: Skills and Application. McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th Ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Schermerhorn Jr, J.R. & McCarthy, A. (2004). Enhancing Performance Capacity in the Workplace: A Reflection on the Significance of the Individual. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Setiawan, I.G.A. & Sheidu, C.F. (2024). Impact of Leadership Styles on Employees' Performance. International Journal of Economics And Management Review, 2(1),53-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Setiawan, R., Cavaliere, L.P.L., Navarro, E.R., Wisetsri, W., Jirayus, P., Chauhan, S.,Tabuena, A.C. & Rajan, R. (2021). The impact of leadership styles on employees productivity in organizations: A comparative study among leadership styles. Productivity Management, 26(1), 382-404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Shanmugam, H., Juhari, J.A., Nair, P., Ken, C.S. & Guan, N.C. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in Malaysia: a single thread of hope. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry, 29(1), 78-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Smajlović, S., Umihanic, B. & Turulja, L. (2019). The interplay of technological innovation and business model innovation toward company performance. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 24(2), 63-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Smith, D.G. (1964). Pragmatism and the group theory of politics. American political science review, 58(3), 600-610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sudit, E.F. & Sudit, E.F. (1984). The Productivity Concept: Definition, Measurement and Managerial Importance. Productivity Based Management, 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Suprayitno, D. (2024). Leadership Style and Employee Productivity in Manufacturing Companies In Indonesia. Commercium: Journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 31-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Turcotte‐Légaré, N., Gaudet, M.C. & Doucet, O. (2023). Understanding the effects of empowering leadership on positive and negative performance behaviors: A manufacturing sector study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 40(2), 218-231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Wei, L. and Vasudevan, H.L. (2022). Leadership style and company performance in the manufacturing industry. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage, 7(3),14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Winston, B.E. & Patterson, K. (2006). An integrative definition of leadership. International journal of leadership studies, 1(2), 6-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Xuefeng, Q. (2023). The effect of leadership style on employee motivation: A case study of manufacturing companies. Journal of Management and Administration Provision, 3(1), 12-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row; 886. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Yousef, D.A. (2000). Organizational commitment: a mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non‐western country. Journal of managerial Psychology, 15(1), 6-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)