"Dactylographic Analysis Among Interracial Populations: A Comparative Analysis of African and Indian Demographics"

Fingerprint analysis, a cornerstone of forensic science, relies on the unique patterns of ridges and valleys on the fingertips, known as dermatoglyphics or dactylography patterns. Understanding the variability of these patterns among different population groups is crucial for accurate forensic identification. This study delves into the comparative analysis of dermatoglyphic patterns among interracial population groups, specifically focusing on individuals of African and Indian descent. A diverse sample of 100 typical adolescents, under 45, was randomly selected from various schools within the National Forensic Sciences University in Gujarat, India. This sample comprised 25 males and 25 females from African countries currently residing in India, alongside Indian students. Participants willingly consented to the research, which involved a thorough cleansing process to eliminate external contaminants from their hands. Inkless pads were used to collect fingerprint impressions, and advanced digital proscope technology facilitated the analysis of the ridge characteristic- ridge thickness. The results of the study revealed significant variations in dermatoglyphic patterns between African and Indian population groups.  African females exhibited greater ridge thickness relative to Indian females, with a similar trend observed among African and Indian males. These findings underscore the importance of considering demographic factors in forensic fingerprint analysis, as subtle differences in ridge characteristics can significantly impact identification accuracy. This study contributes valuable insights into forensic science by elucidating the relationship between dermatoglyphic patterns and population demographics. By recognizing and understanding these variations, forensic investigators can improve the accuracy and reliability of fingerprint identification methodologies, particularly when dealing with diverse population groups. Furthermore, the comparative analysis between African and Indian demographics sheds light on the nuanced differences in dermatoglyphic patterns, highlighting the need for inclusive and culturally sensitive approaches in forensic investigations.

Fingerprints, Ridge Thickness, Forensic Science, Proscope, Dermatoglyphics

1. Saferstein, R. (2013). Fingerprints. In Forensic science from the crime scene to the crime lab. Pearson Education, Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Wijerathne, B. T. B., Meier, R. J., Agampodi, T. C., & Agampodi, S. B. (2015). Dermatoglyphics in hypertension: a review. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 34(1), 29. Https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-015-0065-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Singh, M. S. U., & Kadu, S. S. (2020). Pattern of Different Types of Fingerprints amongst the Community-an Observational Cross Sectional Study. VIMS Health Science Journal, 7(2), 50–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gibbs, R. C. (1967). Fundamentals of dermatoglyphics. Archives of Dermatology, 96(6), 721–725. Https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1967.01610060115023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baryah, N., & Krishan, K. (2020). Exploration of digital dermatoglyphics of two ethnicities of North India-forensic and anthropological aspects. Forensic Science International: Reports, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Basu, A. (1976). Digital dermatoglyphics of three caste groups of Mysore. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45(3 PT 1), 437–441. Https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330450305 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Mbaka, G., Ejiwunmi, A., Alabi, O., & Olatayo, T. (2016). Digital dermatoglyphic variation and migratory pattern of ethnic Liberians. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 6(4), 416–421. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.06.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Paul, J. N., Oladipo, G. S., & Oghenemavwe, L. E. (2019). Investigation of ancestral relationship of ikwerres’ with binis’ and igbos’ using level 2 dermatoglyphic (minutiae) patterns. International Journal of Pharma Research and Health Sciences, 7(5), 3062–3067. Https://doi.org/10.21276/ijprhs.2019.05.04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ashbaugh, D. R. (1999). Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Langenburg, G. (2019). Ridge Thickness. In Siegel’s Forensic Science (pp. 137–150). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mehdipour, M., & Farhud, D. D. (1978). A DERMATOGLYPHIC STUDY OF IRANAIAN MUSLIMS PART I: FINGER PATTERNS AND RIDGE-COUNTS. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 7(4), 196–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sangam, M. R., Krupadanam, K., & Anasuya, K. (2011). A study of finger prints: bilateral asymmetry and sex difference in the region of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 5(3), 597–600. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chauhan, A. (2017). Feasibility of ridge density: A comparative study of fingerprint ridge densities among different Indian population. Journal of Forensic Sciences & Criminal Investigation, 5(1). Https://doi.org/10.19080/jfsci.2017.05.555654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ramanjit, K., & Garg, R. K. (2011). Determination of gender differences from fingerprint ridge density in two northern Indian populations. Forensic Sciences, 85, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rivaldería, N., Sánchez-Andrés, Á., Alonso-Rodríguez, C., Dipierri, J. E., & Gutiérrez-Redomero, E. (2016). Fingerprint ridge density in the Argentinean population and its application to sex inference: A comparative study. Homo: Internationale Zeitschrift Für Die Vergleichende Forschung Am Menschen, 67(1), 65–84. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2015.09.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Sucharitha, T. M., Phanindra, S. V., & Shaik, A. B. (2021). A study on sexual dimorphism in fingerprint ridge density among medical students of Nellore south coastal district of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Clinical Anatomy and Physiology, 8(3), 194–197. Https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijcap.2021.044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Xie, H., & Lin, Z. (2020). Gender difference analysis of Chinese Han youth based on fingerprint ridge density. E3S Web of Conferences, 198, 04014. Https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019804014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)