Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of Audit Quality

Malaysia, like many other countries, has experienced several corporate scandals that have raised concerns regarding the credibility and integrity of financial reporting. The study examines whether audit quality plays a key role in reducing the impact of management’s entrenchment activities, increases the credibility of the financial report, hence improving the overall firm performance. The data are derived from 540 firm year observations collected over five years (2019-2023). To analyse the data, the Panel Corrected Standard Error is used. The findings show that firms audited by big4 together with the existence of ownership structure (family, government and foreign) perform better. This result indicated that external audit quality is an effective corporate governance mechanism that is likely to monitor family, government and foreign corporate decisions. The result gives understanding to investors, regulators, and financial analysts that the moderating effect of audit quality on the ownership structure would strengthen the corporate board monitoring and deter management from engaging in perpetual unethical practice and improve the overall firm’s performance.

family, government, foreign, audit quality, firms.

1. Abba, H. I., & Sadah, A. A. (2020). Audit quality and firm value of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 1(4), 269-282. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abubakar, A. H., Ibrahim, B. Y., Zakaria, N. N. B., & Kassim, S. F. B. M. (2023). Board attributes, risk management and financial performance: Insights from Iraq. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 5(2), 115-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afifa, M. M. A., Saleh, I. H., & Haniah, F. F. (2021). Does earnings management mediate the relationship between audit quality and company performance? Evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, (ahead-of-print). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Aguilera, R., Duran, P., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Sauerwald, S., Turturea, R., & VanEssen, M. (2021). State ownership, political ideology, and firm performance around the world. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aledwan, B. A., Yaseen, A. A. B., & Alkubisi, A. (2015). The role of audit quality on the relationship between auditor’s and financial performance quality of selected cement firm in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(12), 138-146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aleqedat, H., & Tangl, A. (2020). The Effect of Ownership Structure (Share Book Nationality) and Board Independence on EPS in the Jordanian Insurance Sector. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 85(4), 57-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alipour, M. (2013). An investigation of the association between ownership structure and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Management Research Review, 36(11), 1137-1166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. AlQadasi, A., & Abidin, S. (2018). The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: the role of ownership concentration–Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(2), 233-253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Amran, N. A., & Ahmad, A. C. (2013). Effects of ownership structure on Malaysian companies performance. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4(1), 51-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Anum Mohd Ghazali, N. (2010). Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20(2), 109-119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Aobdia, D., Choudhary, P., & Newberger, N. (2023). The economics of audit production: What matters for audit quality? An empirical analysis of the role of midlevel managers within the audit firm. The Accounting Review, 1-29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bacha, S., Ajina, A., & Ben Saad, S. (2021). CSR performance and the cost of debt: does audit quality matter?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(1), 137-158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bambang, M., & Hermawan, M. (2013). Founding family ownership and firm performance in consumer goods industry: Evidence from Indonesia. Available at SSRN 2292375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bentivogli, C., & Mirenda, L. (2017). Foreign ownership and performance: evidence from Italian firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 24(3), 251-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Beuren, I. M., Politelo, L., & Martins, J. A. S. (2016). Influence of family ownership on company performance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(5), 654-672. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bhakar, S., Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (2024). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: A Comprehensive Review and Empirical Analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Bhatt, P. R. (2016). Corporate governance in Malaysia: has MCCG made a difference. International journal of law and management, 58(4), 403-415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Bhatt, R. R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2017). Family firms, board structure and firm performance: evidence from top Indian firms. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(5), 699-717. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Carney, M., Estrin, S., Liang, Z., & Shapiro, D. (2019). National institutional systems, foreign ownership and firm performance: The case of understudied countries. Journal of World Business, 54(4), 244-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chu, W. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 833-851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Chu, W. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28, 833-851. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Dakhli, A. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm financial performance: does audit quality matter?. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 950-976. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Darko, J., Aribi, Z. A., & Uzonwanne, G. C. (2016). Corporate governance: the impact of director and board structure, ownership structure and corporate control on the performance of listed companies on the Ghana stock exchange. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 259-277. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Din, S. U., Khan, M. A., Khan, M. J., & Khan, M. Y. (2021). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1973-1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Din, S. U., Khan, M. A., Khan, M. J., & Khan, M. Y. (2021). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1973-1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Din, S. U., Khan, M. A., Khan, M. J., & Khan, M. Y. (2021). Ownership structure and corporate financial performance in an emerging market: a dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(8), 1973-1997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Elewa, M. M., & El-Haddad, R. (2019). The effect of audit quality on firm performance: A panel data approach. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 9(1), 229-244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fajri, S. N. (2019). the Effect of Financial Stability, External Pressure, Personal Financial Need, Financial Targets, Ineffective Monitoring and Audit Quality on Detecting Fraud Financial Statement in Perspective of Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 23(2), 194-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Farouk, M. A., & Bashir, N. M. (2017). Ownership structure and earnings management of listed conglomerates in Nigeria. Indian-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1(4), 42-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fauzi, H., & Musallam, S. R. (2015). Corporate ownership and company performance: a study of Malaysian listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 439-448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Fauzi, H., & Musallam, S. R. (2015). Corporate ownership and company performance: a study of Malaysian listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 439-448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Fooladi, M., & Shukor, Z. A. (2012, December). Board of directors, audit quality and firm performance: evidence from Malaysia. In National Research & Innovation Conference for Graduate Students in Social Sciences (pp. 7-9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Fossung, M. F., Mukah, S. T., Berthelo, K. W., & Nsai, M. E. (2022). The Demand for External Audit Quality: The Contribution of Agency Theory in the Context of Cameroon. Account. Finance Res, 11, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Fukuda, S. I., Kasuya, M., & Nakajima, J. (2018). The role of corporate governance in Japanese unlisted companies. Japan and the World Economy, 47, 27-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ghaleb, B. A. A., Kamardin, H., & Tabash, M. I. (2020). Family ownership concentration and real earnings management: Empirical evidence from an emergin [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Guo, J., Huang, P., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, N. (2015). Foreign ownership and real earnings management: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(2), 185-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Gurbuz, A. O., & Aybars, A. (2010). The impact of foreign ownership on firm performance, evidence from an emerging market: Turkey. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2(4), 350-359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Haji, A. A. (2014). The relationship between corporate governance attributes and firm performance before and after the revised code: Some Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 24(2), 134-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of business finance & accounting, 33(7‐8), 1034-1062. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Heriyah, N. (2020). The Effect Of Return On Assets, Leverage, And Company Size On Tax Avoidance On Manufacturing Companies Listed On The Idx. JASA (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 4(2), 206-215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Hooy, G. K., Hooy, C. W., & Chee, H. K. (2020). Ultimate ownership, control mechanism, and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(15), 3805-3828. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Husna, A., & Satria, I. (2019). Effects of return on asset, debt to asset ratio, current ratio, firm size, and dividend payout ratio on firm value. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(5), 50-54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Jusoh, M. A., Rashid, M., & Ajis, M. N. E. (2020). The influence of foreign investors on firm performance in Malaysia: A case of trading and services listed firms. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kao, M. F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 19(1), 189-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Kao, M. F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 19(1), 189-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Karim, S., Naeem, M. A., & Ismail, R. B. (2022). Re-configuring ownership structure, board characteristics and firm value nexus in Malaysia: the role of board gender and ethnic diversity. International Journal of Emerging Markets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Karim, S., Naeem, M. A., & Ismail, R. B. (2022). Re-configuring ownership structure, board characteristics and firm value nexus in Malaysia: the role of board gender and ethnic diversity. International Journal of Emerging Markets. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Khan, M. T., Al‐Jabri, Q. M., & Saif, N. (2021). Dynamic relationship between corporate board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(1), 644-661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kweh, Q. L., Ahmad, N., Ting, I. W. K., Zhang, C., & Hassan, H. (2019). Board gender diversity, board independence and firm performance in Malaysia. Institutions and Economies, 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., Hanh, L. T. M., & Zhang, C. (2019). Intellectual capital, governmental presence, and firm performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 193-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Lakhal, N. (2015). Corporate disclosure, ownership structure and earnings management: The case of French-listed firms. Journal of applied business research, 31(4), 1493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Laporšek, S., Dolenc, P., Grum, A., & Stubelj, I. (2021). Ownership structure and firm performance–The case of Slovenia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 34(1), 2975-2996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Laporšek, S., Dolenc, P., Grum, A., & Stubelj, I. (2021). Ownership structure and firm performance–The case of Slovenia. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 34(1), 2975-2996. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Le, T. P. V. (2015). Ownership structure, capital structure and firm performance: a study of Vietnamese listed firms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney (Australia)). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Liew, C. Y., & Devi, S. S. (2021). Family firms, banks and firm value: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(1), 51-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Maury, B. (2006). Corporate performance, corporate governance and top executive turnover in Finland. European Financial Management, 12(2), 221-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Minh Ha, N., Do, B. N., & Ngo, T. T. (2022). The impact of family ownership on firm performance: A study on Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2038417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Mohammad, H. S., Bujang, I., & Abd Hakim, T. (2019). Capital structure and financial performance of Malaysian construction firms. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(12), 1306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2014). Board of directors and performance of Malaysian companies. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting 11, 6(2), 117-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2020). Governance and ownership in Malaysia: their impacts on corporate performance. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 285-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2020). Governance and ownership in Malaysia: their impacts on corporate performance. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 285-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2020). Governance and ownership in Malaysia: their impacts on corporate performance. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 285-298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Moundigbaye, M., Rea, W. S., & Reed, W. R. (2018). Which panel data estimator should I use?: A corrigendum and extension. Economics, 12(1), 20180004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. MUNTAHANAH, S., KUSUMA, H., HARJITO, D. A., & ARIFIN, Z. (2021). The effect of family ownership and corporate governance on firm performance: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 697-706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Musallam, S. R., Fauzi, H., & Nagu, N. (2019). Family, institutional investors ownerships and corporate performance: the case of Indonesia. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Omer, W. K. H., Aljaaidi, K. S., & Habtoor, O. S. (2020). Board quality, audit quality and economic firm value: the case of manufactured Saudi's listed companies. Calitatea, 21(178), 96-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Ongore, V. O. (2011). The relationship between ownership structure and firm performance: An empirical analysis of listed companies in Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Ongore, V. O. (2011). The relationship between ownership structure and firm performance: An empirical analysis of listed companies in Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Pallant, J. (2011). Survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2020). Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 14(6), 1251-1297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., & Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 559619. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Randolph, R., Su, E., & Memili, E. (2023). How does the founding family matter in corporate governance? A study of the entrenchment heterogeneity among S&P 1,500 firms. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Rashid, M. M. (2020). Ownership structure and firm performance: the mediating role of board characteristics. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(4), 719-737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Rashid, M. M. (2020). Ownership structure and firm performance: the mediating role of board characteristics. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(4), 719-737. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Rompotis, G., & Balios, D. (2023). Audit quality, firm performance and risk: evidence from Greece. Review of Accounting and Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Saputra, F. (2022). Analysis Effect Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) and Price Earning Ratio (PER) on Stock Prices of Coal Companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) Period 2018-2021. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 3(1), 82-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Shyu, J. (2011). Family ownership and firm performance: evidence from Taiwanese firms. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 7(4), 397-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Srivastava, A., & Bhatia, S. (2022). Influence of family ownership and governance on performance: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 23(5), 1135-1153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Srivastava, A., & Bhatia, S. (2022). Influence of family ownership and governance on performance: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 23(5), 1135-1153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Boston, MA: pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Ting, I. W. K., & Lean, H. H. (2015). Does government ownership matter? Comparative study between GLCs and NGLCs in Malaysia. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(02), 1550019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Ting, I. W. K., & Lean, H. H. (2015). Does government ownership matter? Comparative study between GLCs and NGLCs in Malaysia. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(02), 1550019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Tran, N. M., Nonneman, W., & Jorissen, A. (2014). Government ownership and firm performance: The case of Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(3), 628-650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Tsegba, I. N., Herbert, W. E., & Ene, E. E. (2014). Corporate ownership, corporate control and corporate performance in sub-Saharan African: Evidence from Nigeria. International Business Research, 7(11), 73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?. Journal of financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wasiuzzaman, S., Sahafzadeh, I., & Rezaie Nejad, N. (2015). Prospect theory, industry characteristics and earnings management: A study of Malaysian industries. Review of accounting and finance, 14(3), 324-347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Wellalage, N. H., & Locke, S. (2012). Ownership Structure and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Law and Governance, 7(1), 51-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Wijaya, A. L. (2020). The effect of audit quality on firm value: a case in Indonesian manufacturing firm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Yang, Y. F., & Chen, Y. S. (2016). Quality moderates market competition: evidence of Taiwanese service industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(9), 1332-1345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Zeitun, R., & Tian, G. G. (2007). Does ownership affect a firm's performance and default risk in Jordan?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 7(1), 66-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Zulaikah, S., Larasati, D. A., & Harymawan, I. (2019). Government ownership, human resources disclosure, and firm performance: Evidence from the banking industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(8), 238-264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)