Association Between Positive Self-Talk and Body Dissatisfaction Among Persons with Disabilities (Physical and Sensory)

In this present situation, physical appearance is often balanced with self- perception, creating a challenging environment for Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) whose physique may not confirm to ableist standards. When real-life validation is seen low or negative, internal cognitive processes specifically self-talk become a critical determinant of mental well-being. This study explores how positive self- talk influences body dissatisfaction among persons with physical and sensory disabilities. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected from 50 participants (N =50) aged between 18 to 35 through purposive sampling method. Participants completed standardized self- report questionnaires measuring Positive Self-Talk (PSTS) and Body Dissatisfaction (BIS), with all responses kept confidential and collected under strict ethical guidelines. Preliminary findings suggests that individuals who engage in frequent positive self- talk experience significantly lower levels of body dissatisfaction (r = −0.72). Furthermore, comparative analysis indicates that the individuals with physical disabilities report higher dissatisfaction when compared to those with sensory disabilities. Framed within Cognitive Behavioral Theory, this study highlights how the human need for self- acceptance persists even when physical functionality is compromised, often finding expression through internal dialogue.

Positive self-talk, body dissatisfaction, physical disability, sensory disability, cognitive reframing, mental health.

1. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Burnett, P. C. (1994). Self-talk in upper elementary school children. Journal of Rational Emotive Therapy, 12(3), 181189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Calogero, R. M. (2012). Objectification theory, self- objectification, and body image. In T. F. Cash (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (Vol. 2, pp. 574-580). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cash, T. F. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral perspectives on body image. In Body image: A hand book of theory, research, and clinical practice. Guilford Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Claude M. Steele (1988). The psychology of self- affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261- 302). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Grogan, S. (2008). “Body image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women, and Children (2nd Ed.),” Routledge, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Taleporos, G., & McCabe, M. P. (2002). Body image and physical disability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Social Science & Medicine, 54(6), 971980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)