Analyzing the Effectiveness of Green Finance in Developing Economies: The Role of Climate-Linked Investment Strategies

Green finance has become a key mechanism for mobilizing climate-aligned capital to advance sustainable development objectives. However, in many developing economies, the adoption and effectiveness of green financial instruments remain uneven and underexplored. Existing literature tends to be fragmented, with limited synthesis on how tools such as green bonds, blended finance, and ESG-linked investments generate measurable environmental and developmental impacts. This study addresses that gap by conducting a systematic and integrative review of 67 peer-reviewed articles and policy reports published between 2020 and 2025. Applying PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the review evaluates how climate-linked financial instruments perform across diverse institutional, regional, and sectoral contexts.

Findings reveal that green finance effectiveness is significantly shaped by mediating factors like ESG integration and climate risk evaluation, and moderated by institutional quality, regulatory clarity, and investor confidence. While tools such as green bonds and blended finance show strong potential in emissions reduction and resilience-building, structural barriers—such as governance deficits, limited data systems, and fragmented markets—remain persistent in many contexts. The study proposes an integrated conceptual framework and a policy-action roadmap that map the pathways through which green finance contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). It bridges theoretical and applied perspectives, offering actionable insights for policymakers, development finance institutions, and private investors.

green finance; climate investment; developing economies; ESG; SDGs; blended finance

1. African Development Bank. (2023). African economic outlook 2023: Mobilizing private sector financing for climate and green growth in Africa. African Development Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Attridge, S., & Engen, L. (2019). Blended finance in the poorest countries: The need for a better approach. Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banga, J. (2022). The green bond market in emerging economies: Challenges and opportunities for climate finance mobilization. Climate Policy, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1986372 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baranzini, A., van den Bergh, J. C., Carattini, S., et al. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: Seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(4), e462. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0175-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Climate Bonds Initiative. (2024). Green bond market summary 2024. Climate Bonds Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ehlers, T., Packer, F., & de Greiff, K. (2020). The pricing of green bonds. Bank for International Settlements. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gatzert, N., & Kosub, T. (2016). Risks and risk management of renewable energy projects: The case of onshore and offshore wind parks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Labour Organization. (2022). World employment and social outlook 2022: Greening with jobs. International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Climate finance policy assessment framework. International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kölbel, J. F., Heeb, F., Paetzold, F., & Busch, T. (2022). Can sustainable investing save the world? Reviewing the mechanisms of investor impact. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619842535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Macaskill, S., & Guthrie, P. (2021). Financing low-carbon infrastructure: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable finance. Energy Policy, 147, 111866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Green finance and investment: Enabling the transition to a sustainable economy. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Volz, U., Beirne, J., Ambrosio Preudhomme, N., Fenton, A., Mazzacurati, E., Renzhi, N., & Stampe, J. (2020). Climate change and sovereign risk. SOAS University of London and Asian [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2002). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Drone-Based Phenotyping and its Utilization in Crop Improvement: A Review
• An IoT-Enabled Smart Healthcare Monitoring System Using Machine Learning for Early Health Risk Prediction
• Strategic Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving Operational Excellence in Container Freight Stations Using Evidence from Chennai, India
• Adoption of OTT platforms: Analyzing User Behavior through the UTAUT2 Model
• Customers’ Buying Behaviour in Relation to Online Food Delivery (Evidence from National Capital Region (NCR) of India)