Role of Investor Perception Towards AI-Driven Stock Market in Banglore City

This study aims to evaluate Bangalore investors' perceptions of AI-powered stock market platforms. The study's primary objectives are to ascertain respondents' familiarity with AI-based stock trading platforms, identify the factors influencing their adoption, and assess perceived risks associated with these technologies. It examines how investors' opinions of AI platforms connect to their past experiences with AI-based financial instruments in addition to contrasting trust, efficiency, and decision-making accuracy between AI systems and traditional human financial advisors. The study also examines security and privacy issues as well as consumer preferences when utilizing AI-powered trading platforms. The study is based on primary data collected from 100 respondents in Bangalore, 73 of whom were men and 27 of whom were women.

The findings indicate an increasing awareness of technological advancements in the stock market, since a significant portion of respondents are either somewhat or very familiar with AI-based trading platforms. Accuracy and transparency were shown to be the most significant factors influencing trust in AI-driven platforms. AI-based systems may be helpful in reducing human prejudice, as most respondents acknowledged that emotional bias affects stock market decisions. Despite the fact that many investors consider AI trading to be moderately to extremely risky, the majority of respondents preferred a hybrid approach that combines both AI systems and human experience, and half of the respondents said they would be willing to rely on AI over traditional financial advisors.

Artificial Intelligence in Stock Trading, Investor Perception, AI-Driven Trading Platforms, Risk Perception in AI Finance, Human vs AI Financial Advisory.

1. Arner, D., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. (2016). The evolution of fintech A new post-crisis paradigm. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4), 1271-1319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baker, H. K., & Ricciardi, V. (2014). Investor behavior the psychology of financial planning and investing. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhatia, A., & Bhatia, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence in financial markets Applications and challenges. Journal of Financial Technology, 5(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Biais, B., Foucault, T., & Moinas, S. (2015). Equilibrium fast trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 292-313. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). Machine, platform, crowd Harnessing our digital future. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, H., Chiang, R., & Storey, V. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chishti, S., & Barberis, J. (2018). The fintech book The financial technology handbook for investors, entrepreneurs and visionaries. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dhar, V. (2016). The future of AI in financial services. Communications of the ACM, 59(9), 38-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ferreira, F., & Silva, A. (2024). Stock market prediction using artificial intelligence A systematic review of systematic reviews. Software Impacts, 18, 100864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. Journal of Finance, 77(1), 5-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gomber, P., Koch, J., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and fintech Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hansen, A. L., & Lee, S. J. (2025). Financial stability implications of generative AI Taming the animal spirits. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2019). The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending. Financial Management, 48(4), 1009-1029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kshetri, N. (2020). Artificial intelligence in finance Opportunities, challenges, and implications. IT Professional, 22(3), 24-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2018). Fintech Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lo, A. W. (2017). Adaptive markets and the new world order. Financial Analysts Journal, 73(2), 29-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lussange, J., Palminteri, S., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., & Gutkin, B. (2019). Mesoscale impact of trader psychology on stock markets A multi-agent AI approach. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lussange, J., Palminteri, S., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., & Gutkin, B. (2019). Mesoscale impact of trader psychology on stock markets A multi-agent AI approach. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Martínez, J., & López, P. (2025). Mapping the presence of artificial intelligence in investment funds A systematic review. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5, 256. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ravichandran, S., & Afjal, M. (2025). Investigating the impact of investor attention on AI-based stocks. PLOS ONE, 20(5), e0324450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Romanko, O., Narayan, A., & Kwon, R. H. (2023). ChatGPT-based investment portfolio selection. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shobayo, O., Adeyemi-Longe, S., Popoola, O., & Ogunleye, B. (2024). Innovative sentiment analysis and prediction of stock price using FinBERT, GPT-4 and logistic regression. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shukla, P. K., & Umashankar, S. (2025). The role of advanced technologies in automated trading systems and its influence on investor attitudes. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 10(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Srivastava, V., & Sikroria, R. (2024). AI and algorithmic trading A study on predictive accuracy and market efficiency in fintech applications. ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zhang, R. 2025. The impact of fintech innovation on investor behavior from the perspective of behavioral finance. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 138, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Investigating the Performance of Colour Oxide on the PS/CNSO Oil Paint Production
• Real-Time Fabric Defect Detection Using a Lightweight Deformable YOLO Network
• Recent Trends in the Stock Market: An Analytical Study of Market Dynamics, Investor Behaviour, and Technological Influence
• Evaluation of Structural Dynamics and Equilibrium State, with Case Study of Large Cantilever Projection for a 10- Storey Reinforced Concrete Building in Lagos, Nigeria.
• Multi-Criteria Evaluation of AI-Based Adaptive Learning Platforms in Global Higher Education: A Fuzzy AHP Perspective