Review of the Feasibility and Implications of the Framework for Subsea Power Generation in the Niger Delta

This study develops and evaluates a framework for subsea power generation tailored to the Niger Delta, addressing persistent deficiencies in conventional onshore electricity systems. Using a multidisciplinary approach, the research integrates technical feasibility, economic analysis, environmental impact assessment, and comparative performance evaluation. Key parameters, including tidal velocity, seabed conditions, and system reliability, were analyzed alongside life cycle and cost metrics. Findings indicate that subsea systems offer improved energy efficiency, enhanced reliability, and reduced environmental footprint compared to conventional onshore methods. Economic modeling suggests long-term cost competitiveness despite high initial capital expenditure. The study further demonstrates that localized environmental and geotechnical considerations are critical to system optimization. Overall, the proposed framework presents a viable pathway for sustainable energy development, with significant implications for energy security, industrial growth, and environmental stewardship in the Niger Delta.

Subsea power generation, Niger Delta, Renewable energy systems, Energy feasibility, Environmental impact assessment, Tidal velocity

1. Adoghe, A. U., Adeyemi-Kayode, T. M., Oguntosin, V., & Amahia, I. I. (2023). Performance evaluation of the prospects and challenges of effective power generation and distribution in Nigeria. Heliyon, 9(3), e14416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14416 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahamed, R., McKee, K., & Howard, I. (2020). Advancements of wave energy converters based on power take off (PTO) systems: A review. Ocean Engineering, 204, 107248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agaji, S., Senbore, O., & Caleb, C. (2024). Powering Nigeria: A Recap of Recent Developments in the Electric Power Sector as 2024 Commences with a Flurry of Regulatory Interventions and Proposed Power Asset Sales. ALN Aluko & Oyebode News & Events. Retrieved March 18, 2024 from https://www.aluko-oyebode.com/insights/developments-regulatory-changes-nigeria-electricity-sector-2024/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmed, T., Nishida, K., & Nakaoka, M. (2011). The commercial advancement of 16 MW offshore wave power generation technologies in the southwest of the UK. In 8th International Conference on Power Electronics - ECCE Asia 1476-1483. 10.1109/ICPE.2011.5944474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beaubouef, B. (2023). Subsea power turbines may offer new offshore renewable energy option. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Offshore Renewable Energy. Retrieved 18th March, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14301935/subsea-power-turbines-may-offer-new-offshore-renewable-energy-option [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Baker Hughes. (2023). Waving goodbye to fossil-fueled subsea ops. Retrieved February 9th, 2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. from https://www.bakerhughes.com/company/energy-forward/waving-goodbye-fossilfueled-subsea-ops [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bhandari, R., Arce, B. E., Sessa, V., & Adamou, R. (2021). Sustainability Assessment of Electricity [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Generation in Niger Using a Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Approach. Sustainability, 13, 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010385 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Breeze, P. (2019a). Coal-Fired Power Plants. In P. Breeze (Ed.), Power Generation Technologies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. (Third Edition), 33-70. Newnes. ISBN 9780081026311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00003-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Breeze, P. (2019b). Natural Gas–Fired Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Power Plants. In P. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Breeze (Ed.), Power Generation Technologies (Third Edition), 71-97. Newnes. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00004-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Breeze, P. (2019c). Piston Engine–Based Power Plants. In P. Breeze (Ed.), Power Generation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Technologies (Third Edition) , 99-119. Newnes. ISBN 9780081026311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00005-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Breeze, P. (2019d). Combined Heat and Power. In P. Breeze (Ed.), Power Generation Technologies (Third Edition). 121-14. Newnes. ISBN 9780081026311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00006-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Breeze, P. (2019e). Fuel Cells. In P. Breeze (Ed.), Power Generation Technologies (Third Edition) (pp. 121-143). Newnes. ISBN 9780081026311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102631-1.00007-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Castellon, J., Notingher, P., Agnel, S., Toureille, A., Matallana, J., Janah, H., Mirebeau, P., & Sy, D. (2005). Industrial installation for voltage-on space measurements in HVDC cables. In Fourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005 (Vol. 2, pp. 1112-1118). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16179194 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Charlier, R. H., & Finkl, C. W. (2009). Ocean energy: Tide and tidal power. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chuku, A.J., Okoronkwo, C. A., Nwufo, O. C.,; Uche, R.,; Nwaji, G. N., (2024). Effects of Energy Efficiency Design Index on Resistance, Hydrostatics and Ship Design Using Hughes-Prohaska Method. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management. 6(01), 399-418. ISSN: 2395-5252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP). (2014). CIP aiming to go global with energy islands. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14303850/cip-aiming-to-go-global-with-energy-islands [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Copping, A.E., Hemery, L.G., Overhus, D.M., Garavelli, L., Freeman, M.C., Whiting, J.M., Gorton, A.M., Farr, H.K., Rose, D.J., & Tugade, L.G. (2020). Potential Environmental Effects of Marine Renewable Energy Development. The State of the Science. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8, 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. CorPowers. (2024). Report: Wave energy to play a key role in UK’s net zero ambitions. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14310018/report-wave-energy-to-play-a-key-role-in-uks-net-zero-ambitions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Cullinane, M., Judge, F., O'Shea, M., Thandayutham, K., & Murphy, J. (2022). Subsea superconductors: The future of offshore renewable energy transmission? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, 111943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Crawley, F., & Tyler, B. (2015). HAZOP: Guide to Best Practice: Guidelines to Best Practice for the Process and Chemical Industries. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Daniel. (2012). The race is on – five countries making the most of their marine power potential. Retrieved from February 9th, 2024 https://www.power-technology.com/features/featurethe-race-is-on-five-countries-making-the-most-of-their-wave-power-potential/?cf-view&cf-closed [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Das, B. M., & Sivakugan, N. (2018). Principles of Foundation Engineering (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Diemuodeke, E.O., & Briggs, T.A. (2018). Policy pathways for renewable and sustainable energy utilization in rural coastline communities in the Niger Delta zone of Nigeria. Energy Reports, 4, 638-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Dincer, I., & Zamfirescu, C. (2014). Conventional Power Generating Systems. In Advanced Power Generation Systems. Retrieved January 20th, 2024 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/power-generation-system#:~:text=There%20are%20a%20number%20of,station%2C%20and%20hydroelectric%20power%20station. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ekwueme-Ugwu, C.C. (n.d.). Sustainability and the renewable energy alternative in Niger Delta novels. Retrieved February 10th, 2024 from https://www.academicexcellencesociety.com/sustainability_and_the_renewable_energy_alternative.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Farghali, M., Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Abdelhaleem, A., Ihara, I., Mohamed, I. M. A., Yap, P.-S., & Rooney, D. W. (2023). Social, environmental, and economic consequences of integrating renewable energies in the electricity sector: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(4), 1381–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-023-01587-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Farrpoint (2021). North-Eastern Scotland: Subsea Connectivity Feasibility Study. Retrieved from https://hostinscotland.com/storage/177/SFT27D1V1.2-Subsea-Connectivity-Feasibility-Study---Final-Issue.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Garrett, C., & Cummins, P. (2007). The efficiency of a turbine in a tidal channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 588, 243-251. doi:10.1017/S0022112007007771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Galparsoro, I., Menchaca, I., Garmendia, J. M., Borja, Á., Maldonado, A. D., Iglesias, G., & Bald, J. (2022). Reviewing the ecological impacts of offshore wind farms. npj Ocean Sustain, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-022-00003-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2019). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (5th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Gordonnat, J., & Hunt, J. (2020). Subsea cable key challenges of an intercontinental power link: case study of Australia–Singapore interconnector. Energy Transit, 4, 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41825-020-00032-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2017). Introduction to Emergency Management. Butterworth-Heinemann. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Han, Q. (2023). China’s ocean power stations set to go commercial. Retrieved January 20th, 2024 from https://chinadialogueocean.net/en/climate/chinas-ocean-power-stations-set-to-go-commercial/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Hitachi. (2023). Subsea transformers. Retrieved February 9th, 2024 from https://www.hitachienergy.com/products-and-solutions/transformers/special-application-transformers/subsea-transformers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. HydroWing. (2024a). Inyanga to construct tidal power development at remote Philippines island. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 18th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14304625/inyanga-to-construct-tidal-power-development-at-remote-philippines-island [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. HydroWing. (2024b). Minesto's tidal kite subsea infrastructure works completed offshore Faroe Islands. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14303784/hydrowing-develops-barge-for-tidal-energy-a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. International Trade Administration. (2023). Electricity. Power Systems and Renewable Energy. Retrieved January 20th, 2024 from https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/electricity-power-systems-and-renewable-energy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. IRENA (2020). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019. International Renewable Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. ISO (2006). Environmental management Life cycle assessment Principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006). International Organization for Standardization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Juhlin, R., & Assadi, M. (2024). Harnessing ocean depths for energy: A theoretical framework for evaluating the feasibility of Subsea Pumped Hydro Storage. Journal of Energy Storage, 83, 110510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.110510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kaddoura, M., Tivander, J., & Molander, S. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation from an Array of Subsea Tidal Kite Prototypes. Energies, 13, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Kletz, T. A. (1999). Hazop and Hazan: Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Khan, M.Z.A., Khan, H.A., & Aziz, M. (2022). Harvesting Energy from Ocean: Technologies and Perspectives. Energies, 15, 3456. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Kumamoto, H., & Henley, E. J. (1996). Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists. IEEE Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Leadvent Group. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities in Offshore Wind Farm Interconnections via Subsea Cables. Retrieved February 9th, 2024 from https://www.leadventgrp.com/blog/challenges-and-opportunities-in-offshore-wind-farm-interconnections-via-subsea-cables [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Lesemann, A. R. (2023). Coming innovation for the provision of remote, reliable, unattended power generation and data communications for deep-water applications: The Autonomous Offshore Power System. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.4043/32677-MS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Levitin, G. (2016). Reliability Engineering: Design, Production, and Operation. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lewis, A., Estefen, S. F., Huckerby, J., Musial, W., Pontes, M. T., & Torres-Martínez, J. (2011). Ocean Energy. In IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Lewis, M., Estefen, S., Huckerby, J., and Neill, S. (2011). "Tidal Energy Systems: Design, Optimization, and Efficiency." Renewable Energy Journal, 8(4), 145-160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Maity, S., Sarkar, S., Dutta, K., De, T., & Mukherjee, R. (2023). Renewable Energy and Green Technology. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1003716 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Minesto. (2024). Minesto's tidal kite subsea infrastructure works completed offshore Faroe Islands. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14303582/minestos-tidal-kite-subsea-infrastructure-works-completed-offshore-faroe-islands [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Modarres, M. (2016). Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Mofor, L., Goldsmith, J., & Jones, F. (2014). Renewable Energy in the Water, Energy & Food Nexus. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Moon, S.-H., Park, B.-G., Kim, J.-W., & Kim, J.-M. (2020). Effective algorithms of a power converter for tidal current power generation system. Journal of Power Electronics. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43236-020-00063-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Mwasilu, F., & Jung, J.-W. (2019). Potential for power generation from ocean wave renewable energy source: a comprehensive review on state-of-the-art technology and future prospects. Renewable Power Generation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Narayanaswamy, V., & Bang-Andreasen, H. (2013). Challenges in Realizing Reliable Subsea Electric Power Grid for Tidal Energy Farms. Marine Technology Society Journal, 47(4), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.47.4.17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Niger Delta Partnership Initiative. (2015). A Scoping Study on the Niger Delta Electricity Value Chain. Retrieved from https://www.dai.com/uploads/niger-delta-study.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Oyedepo, S. O. (2012). Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: the way forward. Energ Sustain Soc, 2, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-2-15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach. Charles C Thomas Publisher. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Pelc, R., & Fujita, R. M. (2002). Renewable energy from the ocean. Marine Policy, 26(6), 471-479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Powers, T., Sajadi, A., & Hodge, B.-M. (2022). The current opportunities and challenges for offshore wind in the United States. The Electricity Journal, 35(7), 107061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2021.107061. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Qin, Z., Tang, X., Wu, Y.-T., & Lyu, S.-K. (2022). Advancement of Tidal Current Generation Technology in Recent Years: A Review. Energies, 15, 8042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Rahman, A., Farrok, O., & Haque, M. M. (2022). Environmental impact of renewable energy source-based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, 112279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Rajashekara, K., Krishnamoorthy, H. S., & Naik, B. S. (2017). Electrification of subsea systems: requirements and challenges in power distribution and conversion. CPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications, 2(4), 259-266. doi:10.24295/CPSSTPEA.2017.00024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Rausand, M., & Arnljot, H. (2020). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Ranganathan, R., Subbaram, S., Indira, G., Arul Arasi, N., & Tharmar, S. (2023). A Comparative Study of Renewable Energy Sources for Power Generation in Rural Areas. E3S Web Conf., 387, 05011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338705011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Ranganathan, V., Kumar, A., and Smith, J. (2023). "Comprehensive Evaluation of Power Generation Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Subsea and Onshore Systems." Journal of Renewable Energy Studies, 15(2), 234-250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Rashedi, A., Khanam, T., Jeong, B., & Hussain, M. (2022). Evaluation of environmental sustainability matrix of Deepgen tidal turbine. Ocean Engineering, 266(4), 113031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Reda, A., Abu-Siada, A., Howard, I. M., & McKee, K. K. (2019). A testing platform for subsea power cable deployment. Engineering Failure Analysis, 96, 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.09.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Sourceforge. (2024). OpenProject is the leading open source project management software. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://sourceforge.net/projects/openproject.mirror/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Schneider, K. (2017). Regulating Safety of Traditional and Emerging Technologies. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Shams, S., Prasad, D. M. R., Imteaz, M. A., Khan, M. M. H., Ahsan, A., & Karim, M. R. (2023). An Assessment of Environmental Impact on Offshore Decommissioning of Oil and Gas Pipelines. Environments, 10, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10060104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Strang-Moran, C. (2020). Subsea cable management: Failure trending for offshore wind. Wind Energy Science, 5(4), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2020-56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Taormina, B., Bald, J., Want, A., Thouzeau, G., Lejart, M., Desroy, N., & Carlier, A. (2018). A review of potential impacts of submarine power cables on the marine environment: Knowledge gaps, recommendations and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 96, 380-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Terwiesch, P. (2019). Powering the seabed for a sustainable energy future. Retrieved February 9th, 2024 from https://new.abb.com/news/detail/46746/powering-the-seabed-for-a-sustainable-energy-future [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Thennakoon, T., Hewage, H.T.M., Maneth, D., Sandunika, I., Panagoda, S., Senarathna, C., Sulaksha, T., Weerasinghe, J., Gamage, M., & Perera, D. (2023). Harnessing the Power of Ocean Energy: A Comprehensive Review of Power Generation Technologies and Future Perspectives. ResearchGate. Pages 73-102. Retrieved March 18th, 2024 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372365849_Harnessing_the_Power_of_Ocean_Energy_A_Comprehensive_Review_of_Power_Generation_Technologies_and_Future_Perspectives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). Human Health & Environmental Impacts of the Electric Power Sector. Retrieved January 19th, 2024 from https://www.epa.gov/power-sector/human-health-environmental-impacts-electric-power-sector [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Utilitiesone. (2024). Challenges and Solutions in Offshore Engineering. Retrieved February 23rd, 2024 from https://utilitiesone.com/blog/challenges-and-solutions-in-offshore-engineering [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Vennell, R., Major, R., Zyngfogel, R., Beamsley, B., Smeaton, M., Scheel, M., & Unwin, H. (2020). Rapid initial assessment of the number of turbines required for large-scale power generation by tidal currents. Renewable Energy, 162, 1890-1905 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Vesely, W. E., Goldberg, F. F., Roberts, N. H., & Haasl, D. F. (1981). Fault Tree Handbook. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Verlume. (2024). Shell joins RSP wave power, subsea energy storage project. Renewable Energy. Retrieved March 19th, 2024 from https://www.offshore-mag.com/renewable-energy/article/14304694/shell-joins-rsp-wave-power-subsea-energy-storage-project [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Wallace, D. R., & Fujii, R. U. (1989). Software Quality Assurance: A Practical Approach. IEEE Computer Society Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Wang, H., & Liu, X. (2021). Handbook of Energy Economics and Policy. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Wright, D. J., & Heyman, W. D. (2021). Marine Geospatial Ecology: Mapping the Seafloor and Ocean Currents (1st ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Investigating the Performance of Colour Oxide on the PS/CNSO Oil Paint Production
• Real-Time Fabric Defect Detection Using a Lightweight Deformable YOLO Network
• Recent Trends in the Stock Market: An Analytical Study of Market Dynamics, Investor Behaviour, and Technological Influence
• Evaluation of Structural Dynamics and Equilibrium State, with Case Study of Large Cantilever Projection for a 10- Storey Reinforced Concrete Building in Lagos, Nigeria.
• Multi-Criteria Evaluation of AI-Based Adaptive Learning Platforms in Global Higher Education: A Fuzzy AHP Perspective