00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Secure and Transparent Asset Lending System Using Block Chain

Authors

Ramya N

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saranathan College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institution, Tiruchirappalli, India (IN)

Gopinath R

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saranathan College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institution, Tiruchirappalli, India (IN)

Gowtham K

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saranathan College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institution, Tiruchirappalli, India (IN)

Dhuvaragan R

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saranathan College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institution, Tiruchirappalli, India (IN)

Gokul R

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Saranathan College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institution, Tiruchirappalli, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150300060

Subject Category: Asset Lending

Volume/Issue: 15/3 | Page No: 733-747

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-13

Published: 2026-04-13

Abstract

The conventional asset-backed lending business is often reliant on outdated data management platforms and opaque storage platforms, presenting the industry with very daunting problems, including security breaches, the lack of verifiable ownership histories, and obscure asset disposal practices. To address this, this study came up with a safe web-based system that digitalizes the activities of loans by applying the blockchain technology. The platform is integrated with a modern online architecture, which uses a Virtual Vault Guard to implement the dual-key access protocol, as well as AES encryption and SHA-256 hashing that would guarantee that data about the assets are safely secured on-chain. Smart contracts were automated to create digital receipts that were immutable and to conduct digital bidding of defaulted loans in an atomic swap. The empirical research indicates that the ecosystem improves the general performance of management in terms of availing very structured, secure digital data storage and reliable auditing facilities. The paper concludes that the implementation of a blockchain-based system, which is associated with immutable receipts and transparent bidding, is necessary to ensure complete security, fairness, and efficiency. Based on this, the study suggests that the lending institutions should incorporate this secure ledger of assets and automated system of bidding to enhance customer confidence by providing verifiable digital receipts as well as to provide fair and transparent recovery of capital.

Keywords

Block Chain Technology, Asset-Backed Lending, Smart Contracts, Immutable Receipts , Digital Bidding , Virtual Vault, and Pawn Management

Downloads

References

1. J. L. Phiri and L. Nsama, "Decentralized frameworks for physical asset tokenization and secure lending," Journal of Financial Technology and Blockchain, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 112-125, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. A. Sahara, B. T. Nugroho, and C. Wibowo, "Smart contract automation for transparent loan execution and liquidation," International Journal of Digital Assets, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45-58, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. R. Alfianda, S. Maulana, and T. Hidayat, "Evaluating AES encryption and SHA-256 hashing in decentralized lending platforms," IEEE Transactions on Secure Computing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 210-224, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. R. Senthil, "Architectural patterns for integrating React and Spring Boot in high-security financial applications," Journal of Web Development and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 334-349, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Y. Yan, "Dual-key access control mechanisms for virtual vault guards in modern pawnshops," International Journal of Information Security, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 88-102, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. F. Schär, "Decentralized finance: On blockchain- and smart contract-based financial markets," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 153-174, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, "An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends," IEEE International Congress on Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 557-564, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. K. Christidis and M. Devetsikiotis, "Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things in asset management," IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 2292-2303, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. A. Kosba, A. Miller, E. Shi, Z. Wen, and C. Papamanthou, "Hawk: The blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts," IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 839-858, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. L. Luu, D. H. Chu, H. Olickel, P. Saxena, and A. Hobor, "Making smart contracts smarter in decentralized finance," ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 254-269, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 2nd Ed. New York: Harper and Row. [12] H. Treiblmaier, "Toward more rigorous blockchain research: Recommendations for writing blockchain case studies," Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1-15, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. M. Vukolić, "The quest for scalable blockchain fabric: Proof-of-work vs. BFT replication," Open Problems in Network Security, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112-125, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Herlihy, M. (2018). "Atomic Cross-Chain Swaps." Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 245-254. [15] J. Bonneau, A. Miller, J. Clark, A. Narayanan, J. A. Kroll, and E. W. Felten, "SoK: Research perspectives and challenges for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies," IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 104-121, 2015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. P. Modesti, L. Freitas, Q. Shotomiwa, and A. Almehrej, "Security analysis of the open banking account and transaction API protocol," Cyber Security and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 100-115, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. A. Kadam, A. Jangid, and N. Singh, "Embedded finance: Scope, challenges and opportunities," BVIMSR Journal of Management Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 45-58, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Traceable AI, "API Security Report: Financial Sector Vulnerabilities," Technical Report on Cybersecurity in Fintech, pp. 12-29, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. ITU-T, "Recommendation F.751.8: Technical framework for distributed ledger technology (DLT) to cope with regulation," ITU-T Series F: Non-telephone telecommunication services, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. IEEE Standards Association, "IEEE P2418.1 Standard for the Framework of Blockchain Use in Internet of Things (IoT) and Distributed Systems," IEEE Standards for Emerging Technologies, pp. 101-118, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OpenID Foundation, "Financial-grade API (FAPI) Security Profile – Part 1: Baseline," OpenID Foundation Security Framework, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77-92, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. B. Tekinerdogan, Ö. Köksal, and T. Çelik, "System architecture design of secure distributed platforms," Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 4173-4188, 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.