Investigating the Hull Girder Strength of the MST-3 Vessel Using Finite Element Analysis

Ship longitudinal strength analysis is critical for ensuring structural integrity and safety throughout the vessel's operational life. This study presents a comprehensive finite element analysis (FEA) of the MST-3 vessel's longitudinal strength using ANSYS software, focusing on hull girder behaviour under extreme loading conditions. The research employed advanced computational methods to evaluate structural response under sagging and hogging conditions, incorporating material nonlinearity, initial imperfections, and residual stresses from welding processes. The MST-3 vessel, with principal dimensions of 185.0m LOA, 28.5m beam, and 15.2m depth, was modelled using 68,530 finite elements (SHELL181 and BEAM188) with 72,840 nodes. The analysis incorporated AH36 steel material properties with yield strength of 355 MPa and considered initial deflections following elastic buckling modes. Boundary conditions were applied using multi-point constraints (MPC) at the model extremities to simulate simply supported conditions. Results demonstrate that the vessel meets all classification rule requirements with significant safety margins. The ultimate bending moment capacity reached 1,245,680 kN⋅m under sagging conditions and 1,187,420 kN⋅m under hogging conditions, exceeding design requirements by 39.1%. Maximum von Mises stress of 284.7 MPa occurred at hatch corner connections, representing 80.2% of yield strength. Critical stress concentrations were identified at deck-side shell junctions (267.3 MPa), engine room bulkheads (245.8 MPa), and cargo hold corners (231.5 MPa). The progressive collapse analysis revealed ductile failure behaviour with adequate post-ultimate strength reserves. Buckling analysis showed minimum safety factors of 1.85 for all structural components, with longitudinal girders exhibiting the lowest buckling margins. The finite element methodology demonstrated excellent correlation with analytical beam theory solutions, validating the computational approach with maximum differences below 1%. Key findings indicate that while the vessel structure is adequate, hatch corner reinforcement is recommended to address stress concentrations. The study concludes that modern finite element techniques provide reliable tools for ship structural assessment when properly validated. The developed methodology offers practical engineering solutions for longitudinal strength evaluation and optimization of marine structures.

Ship longitudinal strength, finite element analysis, hull girder, structural assessment, ANSYS

1. Belkaid, S. (1986). Analytical equations for strength and post-buckling behaviour of stiffened plates. Admiralty Research Establishment [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Carlsen, C. A. (1980). Simplified collapse analysis of stiffened plates. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding, 423-433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Carlsen, C. A., & Czuiko, E. (1980). The effect of initial distortions on the ultimate strength of rectangular plates under uniaxial compression. Journal of Ship Research, 24(3), 146-157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chirica, I., Chirica, R. M., & Ungureanu, C. (2009). Numerical and experimental techniques for analysing the torsional behaviour of composite ship hulls. Naval Engineering Journal, 121(4), 87-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chuku, A.J., Okoronkwo, C. A., Nwufo, O. C.,; Uche, R.,; Nwaji, G. N., (2024). Effects of Energy Efficiency Design Index on Resistance, Hydrostatics and Ship Design Using Hughes-Prohaska Method. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management. 6(01), 399-418. ISSN: 2395-5252 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crisfield, M. A. (1975). Full-range analysis of steel plates and stiffened plating under uniaxial compression. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 59(4), 595-624. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dow, R. S., & Smith, C. S. (1986). Effects of localized imperfections on compressive strength of long rectangular plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 6(1), 51-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dwight, J. B., & Little, G. H. (1976). Stiffened steel compression flanges: A simpler approach. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. The Structural Engineer, 54(12), 501-509. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Elbatouti, M., Zayed, A., & Shama, M. (2022). Finite element analysis of container ship hull under combined loading conditions. Ocean Engineering, 258, 111847. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Faulkner, D. (1974). Effect of residual stresses on the ductility of plates in compression. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Journal of Ship Research, 18(4), 205-221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Frieze, P. A., & Guedes Soares, C. (2013). Effects of initial imperfections on the strength of rectangular plates under compression. Marine Technology, 50(2), 78-89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hughes, O. F. (1988). Ship structural design: A rationally-based, computer-aided, optimization approach. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Iijima, K., & Shigemi, T. (2004). Simplified method for torsional strength assessment of container ship structures. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 9(2), 91-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kristensen, H. O. (2016). Statistical analysis of ship dimensions and structural properties. Technical University of Denmark, Department of Naval Architecture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lin, Y. H. (1985). Dynamic relaxation finite difference analysis of stiffened plates. Computers & Structures, 20(4), 637-650. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Little, G. H. (1976). Rapid analysis of plate collapse by live-energy minimization. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 18(3), 121-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mar, J. W. (2003). Structural mechanics in ship design. Marine Technology Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moolani, F. M. (1977). Ultimate load behavior of stiffened plates in compression. Journal of Structural Engineering, 103(6), 1193-1209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Moxham, K. E. (1985). Buckling tests on individual plate elements under in-plane compression. British Maritime Technology Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Novikov, V. V., & Antonenko, S. V. (2015). Hull girder strength analysis under combined bending and torsion loads. Marine Structures, 41, 230-250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ostapenko, A. (1986). Ultimate strength of ship hull under combined loads. Journal of Ship Research, 30(3), 153-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Paik, J. K., Kim, B. J., & Seo, J. K. (2001). Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and ship-shaped offshore structures: Part III - Ultimate hull girder strength. Ocean Engineering, 35(2), 281-286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Parunov, J. (2021). Structural assessment methodology for general cargo ships. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(8), 845-862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Parunov, J., & Uroda, I. (2010). Finite element analysis of general cargo ship structure. Brodogradnja, 61(1), 60-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Richardson, M. D. (2015). Effects of deck openings on hull structural integrity. Naval Architecture Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rorup, J., Tesmer, P., & Nielsen, U. D. (2016). Finite element methods in maritime structural analysis: Current practices and future developments. Marine Technology, 53(4), 201-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Senjanović, I., & Rudan, S. (2008). Analysis of large container ships using 3D finite element models with and without superstructures. Brodogradnja, 59(3), 243-260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Senjanović, I., & Vladimir, N. (2011). Hydro-structure analysis of large container ships using beam structural model. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 3(4), 246-257. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Shama, M. (2010). Torsional analysis of ship hull structures under oblique wave loading. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2(1), 45-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Smith, C. S. (1977). Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship's hull. Proceedings of International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding, 73- 79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Soares, C. G., & Kmiecik, M. (1993). Simulation of the ultimate compressive strength of unstiffened rectangular plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 27(1-3), 173-194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tang, D., Yue, Q., Shen, L., & Hu, J. (2019). Real-time assessment of ship longitudinal strength for decision support systems. Ocean Engineering, 192, 106542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Valsgård, S., Steen, E., & Skjong, R. (1995). Analysis of fatigue in ship structures due to torsional loading. Det Norske Veritas. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Vernon, T. A., & Nadeau, J. C. (1987). Comparison of St. Venant and warping torsion theories for thin-walled beams. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 113(6), 899-914. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Vladimir, N., & Senjanović, I. (2016). Direct strength assessment of ultra large container ships: Methodology and application. Ships and Offshore Structures, 11(3), 225-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Wu, M. K., Moan, T., & Hermundstad, O. A. (2007). Model test methods for ship strength determination. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Barsotti, B., et al. (2025). Experimental and numerical assessment of ultimate strength using nonlinear finite element analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Caridis, P. A. (2025). Hull Girder Strength Assessment Using the Finite Element Method. In Global Strength of Ships: Analysis and Design using Mathematical Methods. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Cui, H., et al. (2024). Effect of welding initial imperfections on the ultimate longitudinal strength of a hull girder: A finite element study. Journal of Ship Mechanics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ilić, N. (2025). Evaluation of hull girder ultimate strength for dry-cargo inland vessels via finite element analysis. Marine Structures. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Yu, H., Wu, S., Zhao, Y., Liu, W., & Yang, H. (2024). A novel hull girder design methodology for prediction of the longitudinal structural strength of ships. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(12), 2368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhang, W., Cui, J., & Wang, D. (2024). A two-step approach for evaluating the dynamic ultimate load capacity of ship structures via nonlinear FEM. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(2), 219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Investigating the Performance of Colour Oxide on the PS/CNSO Oil Paint Production
• Real-Time Fabric Defect Detection Using a Lightweight Deformable YOLO Network
• Recent Trends in the Stock Market: An Analytical Study of Market Dynamics, Investor Behaviour, and Technological Influence
• Evaluation of Structural Dynamics and Equilibrium State, with Case Study of Large Cantilever Projection for a 10- Storey Reinforced Concrete Building in Lagos, Nigeria.
• Multi-Criteria Evaluation of AI-Based Adaptive Learning Platforms in Global Higher Education: A Fuzzy AHP Perspective