The Strategic Role of Issue Composition and Market Sentiment in Determining Initial Public Offer (IPO) Underpricing and Valuation in India
Authors
Viswan M G
Department of Commerce,SSV College, Valayanchirangara, Perumbavoor (IN)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400021
Subject Category: Initial Public Offer
Volume/Issue: 15/4 | Page No: 238-243
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-02
Published: 2026-05-02
Abstract
This study investigates the strategic interplay between Issue Composition (Proportion of Fresh Capital vs. Offer for Sale (OFS)), Market Sentiment ("hot" vs. "cold" markets), and the resulting Underpricing and Valuation of 236 Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in the Indian capital market during 2009-2020. The analysis confirms a negative relationship between the proportion of fresh capital and underpricing, with full OFS issues (0% fresh) recording the highest average underpricing (20.61%) and 100% fresh issues recording the lowest (8.04%). Critically, a mean comparison shows that issuers opportunistically float a significantly lower proportion of fresh shares during hot market periods (51.62%) compared to cold periods (63.51%), suggesting the exploitation of market waves for existing shareholder exit. Furthermore, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression analysis reveals that a lesser proportion of fresh issue is significantly associated with a higher Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio, indicating more aggressive valuation when existing shareholders dominate the offering. The findings support the notion that issue structure acts as a signal to investors and that issuers strategically utilize market conditions to maximize proceeds for both the company and selling shareholders, reinforcing the relevance of prospect theory in the Indian IPO context.
Keywords
Underpricing, IPO, Offer for Sale, Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio
Downloads
References
1. Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. R. (1989). Signalling by Underpricing in the IPO Market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bannenberg, L. J. (2019). The interplay of IPO underpricing and offer size. 45. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3322012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Brau, J. C., Li, M., & Shi, J. (2007). Do secondary shares in the IPO process have a negative effect on aftermarket performance? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(9), 2612–2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.09.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chhabra, S., Kiran, R., Sah, A. N., & Sharma, V. (2017). Information and performance optimization: A study of Indian IPOs during 2005-2012. Program, 51(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-05-2017-0035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Colombo, O. (2021). The Use of Signals in New-Venture Financing: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320911090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Dhamija, S., & Arora, R. K. (2017). Impact of Quality Certification on IPO Underpricing: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 18(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916668611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Habib, M. A., & Ljungqvist, A. P. (2001). Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in IPOs: Theory and Evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ljungqvist, A. (2007). Chapter 7—IPO Underpricing. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of Empirical Corporate Finance (pp. 375–422). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50021-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mumtaz, M. Z., & Smith, Z. A. (2021). IPO cycles in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, S2214845021000016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.01.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Neupane, S., & Poshakwale, S. S. (2012). Transparency in IPO mechanism: Retail investors’ participation, IPO pricing and returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7), 2064–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Performance Analysis of Silicon PV Array Using Infrared Thermography and Detecting Temperature Non-Uniformities
- Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation Performance: The Role of Organizational Agility in the Public Sector
- Comparative Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization Versus Positional Release Technique in Cervical Radiculopathy – An Experimental Study
- Soil Moisture Mapping of Solano Nueva Vizcaya: A Comparison and Review
- Silent Assistance for Emergencies (SAFE): A Mobile-Based Emergency Reporting Application for the Deaf and Mute Community