00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

The Adoption Paradox: Cryptocurrency Regulation, Virtual Digital Asset Taxation, and Financial Inclusion in India

Authors

Maanish M

School of Economics and Commerce, CMR University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560043, India (IN)

Ms. Savitha D

School of Economics and Commerce, CMR University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560043, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400026

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 15/4 | Page No: 287-293

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-04

Published: 2026-05-04

Abstract

India maintains its position as the central hub which has driven cryptocurrency from its initial experimental phase into a global financial revolution. India leads the world in blockchain adoption because it has 119 million crypto users, which makes it the top country for blockchain adoption. The nation enforces a 30 percent flat tax on Virtual Digital Asset earnings. This does not allow taxpayers to reduce their tax burden through loss deductions while it also requires a 1 percent Tax Deducted at Source. The paper analyzes how India has developed its regulatory framework and studies the Finance Act 2022 tax system impacts, and Digital Rupee expansion, and Web3 startup network, and decentralized finance potential for financial inclusion in India. The study shows that India allows about 60 percent of cryptocurrency transactions to occur outside its borders because of its current regulatory system, which is based on information from RBI publications and government policy documents, and Supreme Court rulings, and IMF and FATF reports, and Chainalysis and CoinSwitch industry data, and financial journalism until early 2026. The paper demonstrates that India requires a single regulatory framework, which provides fairness and clarity, and future-oriented guidance to achieve its digital asset economy potential.

Keywords

Cryptocurrency, Virtual Digital Assets, Digital Rupee (CBDC), Financial Inclusion

Downloads

References

1. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain (NBER Working Paper No. 22952). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chainalysis. (2024). The 2024 global crypto adoption index. Chainalysis Inc. https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2024-global-crypto-adoption-index [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chainalysis. (2025). Asia Pacific crypto market report 2025. Chainalysis Inc. https://www.chainalysis.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. CoinSwitch. (2025). Annual report 2025: India crypto market trends and demographics. CoinSwitch Kuber. https://coinswitch.co [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. El Hajj, M., & Farran, I. (2024). Cryptocurrency adoption and financial inclusion: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17040145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Financial Action Task Force. (2024). India mutual evaluation report: Anti-money laundering measures. FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Government of India. (2022). The Finance Act, 2022: Provisions relating to virtual digital assets. Ministry of Finance. https://www.incometax.gov.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Griffin, J. M., & Shams, A. (2020). Is Bitcoin really untethered? Journal of Finance, 75(4), 1913–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kayani, U., & Hasan, M. (2024). Crypto remittances and the cost of cross-border transfers in South Asia. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12010034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kyaw, T. (2025). Barriers to cryptocurrency adoption in developing economies: A systematic review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4812345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Le, T. H. (2025). Cryptocurrency, CBDCs, and macroeconomic dynamics in emerging economies. Journal of International Money and Finance, 148, 103145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Maciejasz, M., Kowal, A., & Brzozowska, A. (2024). Digital financial tools adoption during COVID-19. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 63, 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Digital Rupee circulation update: March 2025. RBI. https://www.rbi.org.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Setyawan, I. R., Santosa, P. W., & Widjaja, A. (2024). Bridging financial inclusion gaps through cryptocurrency and mobile money. Sustainability, 16(3), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Statista. (2025). Cryptocurrency market in India: Revenue and user statistics. Statista Market Insights. https://www.statista.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Supreme Court of India. (2020). Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India (W.P. No. 528 of 2018). https://www.sci.gov.in [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yermack, D. (2015). Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. In Handbook of digital currency (pp. 31–43). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802117-0.00002-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.