The Digital Divide in Wellness: Unpacking the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on University Student Mental Health
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The accelerated spread of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within higher education institutions such as universities signifies a profound technological advancement with dual implications for sustainable development. While AI promises unique opportunities for youth empowerment, its application demands a critical examination of its effect on student wellbeing. This study investigates the influence of AI-mediated educational processes on university students’ mental health through the lens of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2). Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design at a selected public university in Zimbabwe, the study combined quantitative data (n=303 students) with qualitative insights from focus group discussions with students and lecturers. Findings showed a inflexible "Hardware Hierarchy," where 85.5% of students recognise the laptop as an vital "academic station" for critical AI confirmation, while mobile-only users experience a "technologically hollowed-out" state. Even though AI is highly cherished for its usefulness among students using tools like ChatGPT AND Google Gemini as "always-on" tutors, it is somewhat linked with adverse mental health outcomes. These manifest as "Turnitin Anxiety," "Temporal Anxieties" connected to computer laboratory access, and ethical panic emanating from a "legal vacuum" in institutional AI policy. Furthermore, qualitative narratives demonstrate "Techno-Exhaustion" among faculty, particularly female lecturers endeavouring to balance domestic work with the rigours of AI-output verification. Overall, the study concludes that the digital divide has evolved from a matter of connectivity to a "Divide in Wellness." It recommends institutional innovation beyond simple technological application and proposes application of robust ethical AI policies and subsidised hardware and WIFI data support to ease psychological risks while promoting resilient human capital development within the Education 5.0 framework.
Downloads
References
Government of Zimbabwe. (2026). Digital learning leadership and the fourth industrial revolution: A strategic framework for Zimbabwean higher education. Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development.
Crawford, J. (2025). Epistemic parochialism: Single institution studies in the age of Artificial Intelligence large language models. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7), 1–17.
Lindebaum, D., & Fleming, P. (2024). ChatGPT undermines human reflexivity, scientific responsibility and responsible management research. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12704
Khalid, S. (2025). Ethical concerns of generative AI in assignments. Journal of Academic Integrity, 12(4), 201–218.
Government of Zimbabwe. (2024). National Artificial Intelligence policy: Driving technological utility and academic output. Ministry of Information Communication Technology, Postal and Courier Services.
Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development. (2020). Education 5.0: The philosophy for Zimbabwe's higher education transformation. Government Printers.
Wang, L., & Wang, L. (2025). Intelligent evaluation method of students' mental health based on Internet of Things. IoT and Big Data Technologies for Health Care, 521, 213–228.
Larson, R. W., Moneta, G., Richards, M. H., & Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development, 73(4), 1151–1165.
Khan, G. M., Ali, Z., & Khalid, A. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence based personalized learning on students' motivation and self-regulated learning. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1633–1644.
Huma, T., et al. (2025). Investigating the impact of AI-driven feedback systems on student autonomy and self-directed learning. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 2169–2179.
Achuthan, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and learner autonomy: A meta-analysis of self-regulated and self-directed learning. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1738751. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1738751
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. A. (2025). Conceptualising artificial intelligence as an apprentice. In Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (pp. 67–75). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Izak, M., et al. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and learning: At the dawn of idiocracy? Management Learning, 56(3), 407–415.
Barros, A. (2025). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0122
Alghamdi, L. H., & Alghizzi, T. M. (2025). Educators’ reflections on AI-automated feedback in higher education: A structured integrative review of potentials, pitfalls, and ethical dimensions. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1704820.
Christodoulou, E., & Zembylas, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence as a site of global educational governance: The case of UNESCO. Journal of Education Policy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2026.2314567
Salimi, F. (2025). Aligning policy and practice: The World Bank’s approach to EdTech in Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Futures in Education, 23(6), 1134–1156.
Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.
McDonald, N., et al. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, Article 100121.
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 22.
Crawford, J., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and authorship editor policy: ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI, and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(5), 1–11.
Saleh, E. H. (2025). Empowering learners: Exploring teaching strategies, AI integration, and motivation tools for fostering autonomous learning in higher education. East Journal of Human Science, 1(6), 14–34.
Amiri, S. M. H. (2025). The digital divide revisited: Connectivity, devices, and the hidden barriers to global EdTech equity. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 5(3), 254–267.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
McDonald, N., et al. (2025). AI in educational equity and student mental resilience. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 4, Article 100125.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Creswell, J. W., & Inoue, M. (2025). A process for conducting mixed methods data analysis. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 26(1), 4–11.
Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Generating metainferences in mixed methods research: A worked example in convergent mixed methods designs. Methodological Innovations, 16(3), 276–291.
Baker, R. S., Martin, T., & Rossi, L. M. (2016). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In The Wiley Handbook of Cognition and Assessment (pp. 379–396). John Wiley & Sons.
Cheng, Y. P., et al. (Eds.). (2024). Innovative Technologies and Learning. Springer Nature.
Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.
Oben, A. I., et al. (2025). Teaching with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): Should educators trust AI to guide student learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–14.
Crawford, J., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and authorship editor policy: ChatGPT, Bard, Bing AI, and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(5), 1–11.
Government of Zimbabwe. (2024). National Artificial Intelligence policy: Driving technological utility and academic output. Ministry of Information Communication Technology, Postal and Courier Services.
Republic of Zimbabwe. (2026). National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (2026-2030): Charting Zimbabwe’s Future. Government Printers.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.