00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Impact of Proactive Quality Management Practices on Construction Project Performance

Authors

Aakash Shah

Student, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana (IN)

Jayraj Solanki

Head PG & Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana (IN)

Darshan Shah

Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana (IN)

V. M. Patel

Asso. Executive Dean & Professor, Core Engineering Programs, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400114

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 15/4 | Page No: 1334-1345

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-20

Published: 2026-05-20

Abstract

Quality management is an essential aspect of ensuring that construction projects are completed successfully. Conventional approaches to quality control tend to be reactive since defects are detected after completion, which necessitates rework, wasted materials, higher costs, and delayed schedules. To address such problems, the construction sector is gradually embracing proactive quality management techniques that aim at preventing defects and enhancing performance continuously.


The present study examines the effects of proactive quality management techniques on the performance of construction projects. Specifically, the study addresses preventative inspections, method statements and quality checklists, and worker and engineer training programs. In this research, a mixed-method design was utilized, comprising questionnaires, interviews, site visits, and analysis of Non-Conformance Reports (NCRs). The gathered data was analyzed using percentage analysis, Relative Importance Index (RII), and ranking techniques.


The results show that preventive inspections play a crucial role in recognizing any flaws in the early stages of development, whereas the use of method statements and quality checklists brings about consistency in construction operations. However, it was determined that training and skill development programs had the most significant contribution to productivity levels, quality of workmanship, and eliminating recurrent flaws. This study suggests that quality management approaches play an essential role in improving construction performance by decreasing the occurrence of defects, minimizing rework, reducing the cost of poor quality (CoPQ), and increasing productivity.

Keywords

Proactive, Management, Construction, Project Performance

Downloads

References

1. Ali, K., Mubin, S., & Gavrishyk, E. (2022). Evaluating quality management system of construction projects. International Journal of Productivity and Engineering (IJPE), 18(7), 492–501. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anand, P. D. (2024). Exploring quality management practices in construction projects: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science (IJPREMS), 4(2), 358–365. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ashokkumar, D. (2014). Study of quality management in construction industry. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(Special Issue 1), 36–41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bharsakhale, S. (2020). Impact of quality management in construction on its productivity. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 7(8), 843–848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chin, H. S., Ting, S. N., & Lee, Y. Y. (2024). Quality management challenges in construction projects: Investigating factors, measures, and the role of material quality control. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 22(3), 63–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dhinagaran, S. B. (2023). A study of quality control management in construction industry. International Journal of Novel Research and Development (IJNRD), 8(5), 650–656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gadriwala, T., & Solanki, J. V. (2021). Quality management on construction site. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 8(7), 831. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kwaponga, P., & Pipaliya, J. (2023). Review paper on quality management practices for construction project delivery. Rabindra Bharati University: Journal of Economics, XVI, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Priyadharsan, A. K. S., & Raja, M. N. (2020). Impact of quality control and management in constructions. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7(5), 3968–3973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rawale, P. P., & Mahatme, P. S. (2021). A study on quality management in construction projects at Amravati. Open Access International Journal of Science and Engineering (OAIJSE), 6(7), 112–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sheel, & Pannu, S. (2025). Enhancing project efficiency through quality management practices in the construction industry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME), 11(1), 139–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Sheoran, V., & Thakur, D. J. (2023). A study on evaluation of quality management systems in construction projects. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(4), 2037–2048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Shukla, A. K., & Sakale, R. (2021). Analysis of quality on construction and construction cost. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 4(1), 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Thamilarasu, V., Rajprasad, J., & Ram Prasanna, P. T. (2017). A case study on requirements of quality workmanship in construction projects. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(4), 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mane, P. P., & Patil, J. R. (2015). Quality management system at construction project: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 5(3, Part 3), 126–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.