00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning

Authors

Tanmay Sahu

Computer Science Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management & Technology, Raipur (IN)

Alex Tigga

Computer Science Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management & Technology, Raipur (IN)

Sapna Singh Kshatri

Computer Science Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management & Technology, Raipur (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500001

Subject Category: Computer Science Engineering

Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 1-16

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-22

Published: 2026-05-22

Abstract

The use of block-based programming software has a major impact on education, particularly those that are stuck in the early education stage, such as children and beginners (i.e., “New To Programming”). In this paper, we look at how effective these Toolkits for teaching computing are in many different teaching moments if they are created using drag-and-drop Graphic Programming Interfaces with code blocks that interlock together (Just Think of a Jigsaw Puzzle). We will provide examples from many different software platforms and review the current research available that has been published over the last couple of years regarding the benefits of Visual Programming Languages in relation to Thinking Critically About and Creating Computer Programs and Applying Concepts of Implementation in Your Everyday Life. The research used for this paper included a sample size of over 500 students from multiple school districts across Canada and out of these, we found considerable growth in students’ ability to solve problems and their ability to think logically and their confidence to create an original program (i.e., writing/coding itself). Block-based programming should be used as a bridge or scaffold between computational Thinking and real-world application, therefore providing students access + engagement + success in learning to Program and grow their skills in Computer Science Histories.

Keywords

block-based programming, visual programming, computational thinking, educational technology, Scratch, programming pedagogy

Downloads

References

1. M. Resnick et al., “Scratch: Programming for all,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 60–67, Nov. 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. J. Maloney, M. Resnick, N. Rusk, B. Silverman, and E. Eastmond, “The Scratch programming language and environment,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–15, Nov. 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. A. Paivio, Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. J. M. Wing, “Computational thinking,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35, Mar. 2006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. S. Grover and R. Pea, “Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field,” Educational Researcher, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 38– 43, Jan. 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, 1980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. K. Brennan and M. Resnick, “New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking,” in Proceedings [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, 2012, pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. D. Weintrop and U. Wilensky, “Comparing block-based and textbased programming in high school computer science classrooms,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Oct. 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. M. Román-González, J.-C. Pérez-González, and C. Jiménez-Fernández, “Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 72, pp. 678–691, July 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. L. A. Becker and R. S. Oxman, “Designing for diversity: Incorporating multiple perspectives in introductory computer science courses,” ACM Inroads, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 56–63, June 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Y. B. Kafai and Q. Burke, “Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 50, no. 4, pp. 313–334, Oct. 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. C. Lewis, “The importance of students' attention to program state: A case study,” Computer Science Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 285– 299, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. M. Armoni, O. Meerbaum-Salant, and M. Ben-Ari, “From Scratch to 'real' programming,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1–15, Feb. 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.