Systematic Evaluation of Managed Pressure Drilling Variants: A Framework-Based Comparative Review for Operational Decision Support | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Systematic Evaluation of Managed Pressure Drilling Variants: A Framework-Based Comparative Review for Operational Decision Support

Authors

Jagroop Singh Yadav

Department of Mathematics, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India (IN)

Dr. Harsh Vardhan

Department of Mathematics, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India (IN)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500063

Subject Category: Mathematics

Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 768-775

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-01

Published: 2026-06-01

Abstract

MPD has evolved from a niche technique into a mainstream drilling capability over the last decade. It is now used in HPHT, deepwater, unconventional tight-gas, and sour-gas reservoirs. Despite this widespread adoption, the operational question of which MPD variant is best suited to a particular well profile has historically been addressed in the published literature on a case-by-case basis, without structured comparative synthesis. This paper addresses that gap through a systematic framework-based evaluation of fourteen MPD case-study publications sourced from the SPE and IADC literature between 2015 and 2025. A six-dimensional analytical framework, inductively developed from the recurring performance themes within the corpus, serves as the uniform evaluative instrument. The six dimensions encompass: well-control sensitivity and detection thresholds; narrow-margin pressure window navigation; non-productive time (NPT) and invisible lost-time reduction; rate-of-penetration (ROP) enhancement relative to conventional baselines; cementing and tripping operational reliability; and economic performance across deployment contexts. Synthesis findings confirm that MPD delivers well-control detection sensitivity approximately one to two orders of magnitude superior to conventional pit-volume methods; that variant selection materially affects operational outcomes; that NPT reduction is robustly demonstrated while ROP enhancement evidence remains comparatively sparse; and that economic viability is strongly contingent on multi-well campaign scale. A structured application-domain selection map, matching ten canonical operational situations to corpus-preferred MPD variants across three evidence-calibrated confidence tiers, is presented as the primary decision-support contribution of this review.

Keywords

Managed Pressure Drilling; Well Control; Narrow-Margin Drilling; Comparative Framework; CBHP; PMCD; ABP; CML; Selection Map; Drilling Engineering

Downloads

References

1. Kinik, K., Gumus, F., & Osayande, N. (2015). Constant bottom-hole pressure managed pressure drilling and dynamic well control: Western Canada field application. SPE Drilling & Completion, 30(4), SPE-168948-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168948-PA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Tan, K. M., Ahmad, F., Tan, W. L., & Goh, C. S. (2015). Successful application of managed pressure cementing in an ultra-HPHT well offshore Malaysia. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference, SPE/IADC-173041-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Loux, B., Hargreaves, D., & Nguyen, V. (2015). Constant bottom-hole pressure managed pressure drilling application in ultra-high-temperature wells, Gulf of Thailand. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, SPE-176046-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bao Ta Quoc. (2016). HPHT best practices and lessons learned in offshore Vietnam using managed pressure drilling. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference, IADC/SPE-180637-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Mahmood, F., Barkat, B., Abshire, K., & Chitty, G. (2017). Industry-first qualification of a rotating control device for gas-tight service per API 16RCD. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, SPE/IADC-185290-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Safipour, R., & Mavaddat, Y. (2017). Managed pressure drilling planning study for a high-sulphur fractured reservoir in southwest Iran. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, SPE-188694-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Yin, Q., Liu, G., Li, H., & Zhou, Y. (2020). A field case study of managed pressure drilling in ultra-HPHT offshore well, South China Sea. SPE Drilling & Completion, 35(2), SPE-191060-PA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Moghazy, S., Goins, K., & Nakagawa, E. (2019). Building the business case for air- or light-fluid-bypass managed pressure drilling in deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference, SPE/IADC-194538-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Arellano, J. (2020). Application of managed pressure drilling and continuous circulation system in the Perla gas field, offshore Venezuela. Proceedings of the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, SPE-199065-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fan, H., Li, J., Liu, G., & Wang, H. (2021). A comprehensive gas-influx detection model for multi-mode managed pressure drilling operations in the Fuling shale gas field. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference, IADC/SPE-201001-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kamal, R., Skadsem, H. J., Cayeux, E., & Friis, H. A. (2021). Managed pressure drilling on an HPHT infill well in the UK Central Graben North Sea. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference, SPE/IADC-202107-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Atchison, B., & Wuest, C. (2021). Integration of managed pressure drilling with automated well control: Test-rig demonstration. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference, IADC/SPE-206385-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Uddin, M., Al-Yami, A., Al-Shammari, B., & Khan, M. (2024). Constant bottom-hole pressure managed pressure drilling across fifty-three horizontal wells in a Saudi unconventional tight-gas field. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference, SPE/IADC-219602-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Limaye, A., Cook, J., Eriksen, K., & Vargo, R. (2025). Phase-2 controlled mud-level managed pressure drilling on a five-well deepwater campaign at the Vito field, Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the IADC/SPE International Drilling Conference, IADC/SPE-228374-MS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. © 2025 by the Authors. Published by IJRISS under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. Published under CC BY 4.0. ISSN 2278-2540.