Examination of the Relationship between Human Rights, Governance, and Emotions Within the Indian Legal System
Authors
Dr. Pooran Chandra Pande
Advocate, Paramarsh Vidhi Karyalay, Shanti Kunj Lane no 2, Ramnagar, Nainital Uttarakhand (IN)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-02
Published: 2026-06-02
Abstract
The relationship between human rights, governance, and emotions within the Indian legal system cannot be overstated. The Indian Constitution provides for basic human rights while establishing democratic structures of governance for justice, freedom, equality, and dignity. Nonetheless, the realization of these principles is profoundly affected by various emotions, including fear, hatred, compassion, humiliation, empathy, and group feeling. The purpose of this research paper is to investigate the connection between human rights, governance, and emotions within the Indian legal system.
The methodological framework that will be used for this study will be a doctrinal approach in which the linkages between the different governing institutions, such as the judiciary, legislature, executive, NHRC, and NGOs, as well as emotions in human rights law, will be examined on the basis of constitutional documents, legislative acts, judicial decisions, literature, and policies. In particular, the cases relating to human rights violations, including custodial torture, gender discrimination, caste discrimination, freedom of expression, internet shutdown, and public interest litigation, will be considered in this research. This is because sometimes there are linkages between social violations and emotions, and people may use any means as a response to any kind of violation committed against them by other people.
Keywords
Human Rights, Governance, Emotions, Indian Constitution and Social Justice.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Adelman, S., & Paliwala, A. (2018). Voicing suffering and commitment of the intellectual. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 31(4), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9585-0 (link.springer.com) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ateriya, N., Saraf, A., Singh, Y. K., & Parchake, M. B. (2026). Constitutionalism and human rights in India: Promise, paradox and practice. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09710973261437889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Basu, D. D. Introduction to the Constitution of India. 22nd ed. New Delhi: LexisNexis, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chakraborty, T. (2024). Decoding the ‘andolanjeevis’: Foregrounding reasoned emotion in the Justice for Rohith Vemula movement. Third World Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2024.2397415 (tandfonline.com) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chatterjee, S., & Sreenivasulu, N. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and human rights: A comprehensive study from Indian legal and policy perspective. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 31(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaad012 (ouci.dntb.gov.ua) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fuchs, S. I. (2024). Symbiotic justice: Hate crimes, police humiliation and layered legal consciousness in Dalit human rights. Social & Legal Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639241236924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jain, M. P. Indian Constitutional Law. 8th ed. New Delhi: LexisNexis, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. NALSA v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. National Human Rights Commission, Annual Reports. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Prakash, P. (2017). Internet blocking and shutdowns in India and international human rights law. Indian Public Policy Review, 3(2), 1–24. https://ippr.in/index.php/ippr/article/view/282 (ippr.in) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Rajagopal, B. (2007). Pro-human rights but anti-poor? A critical evaluation of the Indian Supreme Court from a social movement perspective. Human Rights Review, 8(3), 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0027- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Seervai, H. M. Constitutional Law of India: A Critical Commentary. 4th ed. New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
- Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
- Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
- Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
- Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas