Level of Awareness and Susceptibility to Phishing Attacks Among Students of Quezon City University: A Stratified Survey Study
Authors
Iverson John S. Ventura
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Lance Luis P. Ballesteros
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Justin T. Reyes
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Roland Allan Gabriele L. Villareal
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Ramer Lazan
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Harold R. Lucero
College of Computer Studies, Quezon City University (PH)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500131
Subject Category: Quantitative Research
Volume/Issue: 15/5 | Page No: 1653-1666
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-08
Published: 2026-06-08
Abstract
Phishing attacks continue to pose serious cybersecurity risks in educational institutions as students increasingly rely on digital platforms for academic and personal activities. This study aimed to determine the level of phishing awareness and phishing susceptibility among students of Quezon City University, particularly comparing IT and non-IT students. Using a descriptive-comparative quantitative research design, data were collected from 397 students through a stratified survey conducted using online and printed questionnaires. Statistical tools such as frequency and percentage, weighted mean, independent samples t-test, and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that students generally demonstrated a high level of phishing awareness but showed a moderate level of phishing susceptibility. Results also indicated a significant difference in phishing awareness between IT and non-IT students, with IT students exhibiting higher awareness levels. However, no significant difference was found in phishing susceptibility between the two groups. Furthermore, a significant moderate negative relationship was identified between phishing awareness and phishing susceptibility, indicating that higher awareness is associated with lower vulnerability to phishing attacks. The study concludes that although students possess adequate knowledge regarding phishing threats, awareness alone does not completely prevent risky online behavior. The findings may contribute to the development of targeted cybersecurity awareness programs and safer digital practices among university students.
Keywords
Cybersecurity Awareness, Phishing Attacks, Phishing Susceptibility, Stratified Survey, University Students, Quantitative Research
Downloads
References
1. , Merjina A. Amin, Lina I. Ahaja, Armilyna A. Ahog, Raina T. Ladjahasan, Rima K. Jul, Nerhana J. Radjail, Benczar J. Sayadi, Aljimar J. Sarabi, & Dr. Shernahar K. Tahil. (2024). Understanding the Impact of Phishing Attacks on Organizational Security and Trust. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.34230 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abufardeh, S., & Falah, B. (2023). The State of Phishing Attacks and Countermeasures. Sameer Abufardeh & Bouchaib Falah International Journal of Computer Science & Security (IJCSS), (17), 54. https://www.cscjournals.org/manuscript//Journals/IJCSS/Volume17/Issue4/IJCSS-1702.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adeshola, I., & Oluwajana, D. I. (2025). Assessing cybersecurity awareness among university students: implications for educational interventions. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(4), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00346-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Al Zaidy, A. (2025). Measuring Cybersecurity Awareness of Students: a Study of State College Students. Journal of Information Technology, Cybersecurity, and Artificial Intelligence, 2(3), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.70715/jitcai.2025.v2.i3.030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alabab, B., Cubol, J., Pascual, M. A., Ubaldo, E., Sario, D. R., & Velasco, M. (2024). Cybersecurity Awareness of College Students in a Private Higher Education Institution. CGCI International Journal of Administration, Management, Education and Technology, 1(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.70059/1zw7x826 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aliyu, M., Bagarawa, M. U., Mu’azu, A. N., & Umar, M. T. (2023). Understanding phishing awareness among students in tertiary institutions and setting-up defensive mechanisms against the attackers. Caliphate Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.4314/cajost.v5i1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Aljeaid, D., Alzhrani, A., Alrougi, M., & Almalki, O. (2020). Assessment of End-User Susceptibility to Cybersecurity Threats in Saudi Arabia by Simulating Phishing Attacks. Information, 11(12), 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Alkhalil, Z., Hewage, C., Nawaf, L., & Khan, I. (2021). Phishing Attacks: A Recent Comprehensive Study and a New Anatomy. Frontiers in Computer Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.563060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Alqahtani, S., Nanda, P., & Mohanty, M. (2025). Strengthening Cybersecurity: The Influence of Student Behavior, Perceived Factors, and Mitigating Strategies on Phishing Attack Perception (pp. 313–329). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1483-7_27 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Auton, J. C., & Sturman, D. (2025). Persuasion under pressure: the influence of persuasion principles and time constraints on phishing email susceptibility. Information & Computer Security, 33(5), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-07-2024-0163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Azzeh, M., Mousa Altamimi, A., Albashayreh, M., & AL-Oudat, M. A. (2022). Adopting the cybersecurity concepts into curriculum: the potential effects on students’ cybersecurity knowledge. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 25(3), 1749. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i3.pp1749-1758 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Bhavsar, V., Kadlak, A., & Sharma, S. (2018). Study on Phishing Attacks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 182(33), 975–8887. www.ijcaonline.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Broadhurst, R., Skinner, K., Sifniotis, N., Matamoros-Macias, B., & Ipsen, Y. (2019). Phishing and Cybercrime Risks in a University Student Community. The International Journal of Cybersecurity Intelligence and Cybercrime, 2(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.52306/02010219RZEX445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Casagrande, M., Conti, M., Fedeli, M., & Losiouk, E. (2023). Alpha Phi-shing Fraternity: Phishing Assessment in a Higher Education Institution. Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and Practice, 2022(2). https://doi.org/10.32727/8.2023.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. De Ramos, N. M., & Esponilla II, F. D. (2022). Cybersecurity program for Philippine higher education institutions: A multiple-case study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(3), 1198. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Desolda, G., Ferro, L. S., Marrella, A., Catarci, T., & Costabile, M. F. (2022). Human Factors in Phishing Attacks: A Systematic Literature Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(8), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469886 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Diaz, A., Sherman, A. T., & Joshi, A. (2020). Phishing in an academic community: A study of user susceptibility and behavior. Cryptologia, 44(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01611194.2019.1623343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gan, C. L., Lee, Y. Y., & Liew, T. W. (2024). Fishing for phishy messages: predicting phishing susceptibility through the lens of cyber-routine activities theory and heuristic-systematic model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1552. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04083-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gwenhure, A. K. (2025). University students’ security behavior against email phishing attacks: insights from the health belief model. Journal of Cybersecurity, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaf034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hakim, Z. M., Ebner, N. C., Oliveira, D. S., Getz, S. J., Levin, B. E., Lin, T., Lloyd, K., Lai, V. T., Grilli, M. D., & Wilson, R. C. (2021). The Phishing Email Suspicion Test (PEST) a lab-based task for evaluating the cognitive mechanisms of phishing detection. Behavior Research Methods, 53(3), 1342–1352. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01495-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Han, M., Zhao, H., Ma, X., & Shi, R. (2025). Influencing factors of information security behavior among college students based on protection motivation theory: evidence from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1677024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ismail, N. N. S., Fammy Rikzan, F. I., Katuk, N., Hashim, N. L., & Mohd Zulkefli, N. A. (2023). ENHANCING INFORMATION SECURITY AWARENESS ON PHISHING AMONG IT STUDENTS: A PILOT TEST CASE STUDY AT POLITEKNIK TUANKU SYED SIRAJUDDIN. Journal of Digital System Development, 1, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.32890/jdsd2023.1.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Jampen, D., Gür, G., Sutter, T., & Tellenbach, B. (2020). Don’t click: towards an effective anti-phishing training. A comparative literature review. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-00237-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kuraku, S., Kalla, D., Smith, N., & Samaah, F. (2023). Exploring How User Behavior Shapes Cybersecurity Awareness in the Face of Phishing Attacks. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 71, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V71I11P111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Lee, Y. Y., Gan, C. L., & Liew, T. W. (2023). Susceptibility to instant messaging phishing attacks: does systematic information processing differ between genders? Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 25(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-023-00176-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Le-Nye, E. N. M., Yaacoub, C., & Possik, J. (2024). Evaluating Phishing Awareness Strategies: A Comparative Study of Education-based approaches and Game-based learning. Procedia Computer Science, 251, 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.11.166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Lin, T., Capecci, D. E., Ellis, D. M., Rocha, H. A., Dommaraju, S., Oliveira, D. S., & Ebner, N. C. (2019). Susceptibility to Spear-Phishing Emails. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 26(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3336141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mouncey, E., & Ciobotaru, S. (2025). Phishing scams on social media: An evaluation of cyber awareness education on impact and effectiveness. Journal of Economic Criminology, 7, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Nasser, G., Morrison, B. W., Bayl-Smith, P., Taib, R., Gayed, M., & Wiggins, M. W. (2020). The Role of Cue Utilization and Cognitive Load in the Recognition of Phishing Emails. Frontiers in Big Data, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.546860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Okokpujie, K., Ariyo, M. A., Moninuola, F. S., Akanle, M. B., & Okokpujie, I. P. (2025). Evaluating Students’ Vulnerability and Awareness to Phishing Attacks in Educational Institutions. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 15(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.150320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Omorog, C. D., & Medina, R. P. (2020). Internet Security Awareness of Filipinos: A Survey Paper. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Romel, M., Florendo, B. B., Jacob, M., Ranit, B., Jnel, M. E., Filamor, M., Marinella, M., & Armeza, J. I. (2025). Examining Cybersecurity Awareness Among College Students Across Various Year Levels in the Province of Laguna. www.ijfmr.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ruzaili, H., Katuk, N., Zaini, K., & Abdullah, W. (2026). PHISHING AWARENESS AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: KNOWLEDGE, BEHAVIORS, AND VICTIMISATION PERSPECTIVES. Millenium: Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2026(29). https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0229.43489 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Slater, P., & Hasson, F. (2025). Quantitative Research Designs, Hierarchy of Evidence and Validity. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 32(3), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Sturman, D., Bell, E. A., Auton, J. C., Breakey, G. R., & Wiggins, M. W. (2024). The roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in phishing email detection. Applied Ergonomics, 119, 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Tanti, R. (2024). Study of Phishing Attack and their Prevention Techniques. INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 08(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM38042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Vivien A. Agustin, Joseph Darwin C. Co, Raymund M. Dioses, Criselle J. Centeno, Angeli Joy M. Farol, & Patricia Jenel P. Marcelo. (2024). Unveiling shadows: A gamified approach to raise awareness and combat phishing tactics. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(2), 2077–2084. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.2.3453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. William Vortia. (2025). Modelling cybersecurity awareness, perceived threats and secure online behavioral intentions among Ghanaian university students: A PLS-SEM Approach. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 14(2), 096–111. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2025.14.2.0094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Yin, D., Mullarkey, M., de Vreede, G.-J., & Limayem, M. (2025). Learning by Phishing via Post-Simulation Feedback: From Embedded to Non-Embedded Training. MIS Quarterly, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2025/19354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
- Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
- Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
- Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
- Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas