Transfer of Training in Malaysian TVET Institutions: The Role of Attitude, Organisational Commitment, Perceived Importance and Gender Differences

Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) is a central pillar of Malaysia’s human capital development strategy, particularly in producing industry-ready graduates aligned with Industry 4.0 requirements. The effectiveness of this system is highly dependent on TVET lecturers’ ability to transfer training outcomes into actual teaching practice. However, despite substantial investment in professional development, training transfer among lecturers remains inconsistent and insufficiently examined. This conceptual paper proposes a study involving TVET lecturers in Malaysian higher learning institutions as respondents to investigate transfer of training. The study is guided by three objectives: (i) to assess the level of training transfer, (ii) to examine gender differences, and (iii) to determine the influence of attitude, organisational commitment, and perceived importance on training transfer. The study is underpinned by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), which explains how attitude, organisational commitment, and perceived importance shape behavioural intention and subsequently influence training transfer. Gender Role Theory is integrated to account for possible gender-based differences, particularly in male-dominated technical fields such as automotive and mechanical engineering. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design is proposed, with data analysed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests, and multiple regression analysis via SPSS. This study is expected to extend the literature by integrating TPB and Gender Role Theory in explaining training transfer among TVET lecturers in Malaysia, while providing practical implications for enhancing the effectiveness of professional development programmes.

Transfer of training, TVET lecturers, attitude, organisational commitment, perceived importance, gender differences, TPB, Gender Role Theory

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alghamdi, A. K. H., & Higgins, S. E. (2015). Learning styles and educational technology use among teachers. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(3), 3–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alshaikh, M. E., Hamid, M. R. A., & Ismail, I. A. (2021). Organizational commitment and employee training transfer: Evidence from service organizations. Human Resource Development International, 24(5), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2019). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1245–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316660737 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303035 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cheng, E. W. L., & Ho, D. C. K. (1998). The effects of attitudinal and organizational factors on transfer outcome. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(5/6), 425–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chiaburu, D. S., & Lindsay, D. R. (2008). Can do or will do? The importance of training utility perceptions. Human Resource Development International, 11(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860801933005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chiaburu, D. S., & Marinova, S. V. (2005). What predicts skill transfer? An exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy and organizational supports. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2005.00225.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2024). Malaysia education statistics report 2024. Putrajaya: DOSM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gegenfurtner, A. (2020). Dimensions of transfer of training: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Holton, E. F., Bates, R. A., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200024)11:4<333::AID-HRDQ2>3.0.CO;2-P [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hughey, A. W., & Mussnug, K. J. (1997). Designing effective employee training programmes. Training for Quality, 5(2), 52–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mansor, N., et al. (2025). TVET lecturers’ readiness toward Industrial Revolution 4.0 integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Technical Education and Training. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2023). Graduate employability report 2023. Putrajaya: MOHE Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Noor, M. A., Rahman, F. A., & Ismail, R. (2022). Training transfer among TVET lecturers in Malaysia. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. (2023). Skills outlook 2023: Skills for a resilient green and digital transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a46d518-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rahman, N. A., & Ismail, S. (2024). Professional development and training transfer among Malaysian TVET educators. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 16(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ridzuan, N. A. (2020). Technology integration challenges among Malaysian TVET educators. Malaysian Journal of Education Technology, 20(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Saks, A. M., & Belcourt, M. (2006). An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations. Human Resource Management, 45(4), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20135 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Salleh, N. S. N. M., Amin, W. A. A. W. M., & Mamat, I. (2017). Employee readiness, training design and work environment in influencing training transfer among academic staff of UiTM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 275–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Stevens, C. K., Bavetta, A. G., & Gist, M. E. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 723–735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. The Star. (2025). Rising enrolment in Malaysia’s TVET sector supports workforce demand. The Star. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tziner, A., & Falbe, C. M. (1993). Gender and transfer of training effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 145–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. TVET Malaysia. (2025). National TVET ecosystem report 2025. Putrajaya: TVET Malaysia Secretariat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2022). Transforming technical and vocational education and training for the future of work. UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre. https://unevoc.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. World Bank. (2020). Malaysia economic monitor: Boosting human capital development. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. World Bank. (2023). Skills development and TVET systems: Global and regional insights. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Zainal, N. A., Abdullah, H., & Hassan, R. (2023). Organizational support, commitment and training transfer among educators in Malaysian TVET institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(7), 120–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Zulnaidi, H., et al. (2020). Factors influencing technology adoption among TVET educators. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(5), 112–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Block-Based Programming for Education: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual Programming Environments in K-12 Learning
• Management of Academic Libraries and Client Satisfaction Towards Digital Utilization: Basis for Monitoring Library Operations in SOCCSKSARGEN Region.
• Revenue Leakages in TPA Insurance Claims and Corporate Claims: An Institutional Overview of Aster Prime Hospital, Hyderabad
• Technology and Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism: A Management Perspective
• Geospatial Distribution of Tarok Sacred Grove of Langtang North and Langtang South Local Government Areas